| Author |
When we can see new T610 ? |
multipurpose workermonkey
Joined: Dec 11, 2002
Posts: 13
PM |
i like the little sliding cover for the camera
and who in their right mind would spend the time to make fake cell phone pictures? is there a point to this? |
|
|
shawnmccall9
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Chicago, IL USA
PM |
some questions to go along with the rumors:
1. which GSM bands: 850, 900, 1800, 1900?
2. screen resolution...I won't buy another 101 x 80. that sucked.
3. better reception?
polyphonic ringers is a nice plus too
|
MrSavoy
Joined: Oct 04, 2002
Posts: 267
From: NY, USA
PM |
Borat: How can you confirm that this phone is real. Please tell us, dont hold back. TY. |
Borat
Joined: Sep 12, 2002
Posts: 111
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-13 23:08, MrSavoy wrote:
Borat: How can you confirm that this phone is real. Please tell us, dont hold back. TY.
|
|
I'v tryed the phone 
All I can say is that this phone is great. |
n|ck_xp
Joined: Feb 16, 2002
Posts: 363
From: Greece/Rhodes
PM |
Just wait for the Cebit next month...
This message was posted from a P800 |
anonymuser
Joined: Dec 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-13 22:31, multipurpose workermonkey wrote:
i like the little sliding cover for the camera |
|
I really hope you've spotted something on the t610 picture that I haven't, and you aren't really talking about that bloody telia demo..
Quote:
| and who in their right mind would spend the time to make fake cell phone pictures? is there a point to this? |
|
a lot of people do it- some quite innocently for fun (imagining their dream phone), some for demonstration purposes (like Telia, who never pretended their phone was real), and some just to annoy people on forums like these..
but i believe that T610 picture is real*. it looks right; following the recent SE design curve, but somehow making it good. difficult to say without seeing a few more pictures, and maybe some specs, but they might just have a worthy sucessor there.
* edit- btw, i mean real as in genuine SE design, not real as in genuine photo of an actual phone. it's definitely CGI.
[ This Message was edited by: Boinng on 2003-02-14 01:08 ] |
Fv02
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
Posts: 31
PM |
i think T610 will look like this...
or
or
then i hope that a low budget version of P800 will come...without toutchscreen & bluetooth...
 |
MrSavoy
Joined: Oct 04, 2002
Posts: 267
From: NY, USA
PM |
Borat what does that mean, I have used it and take my word for it? Don't be gay man. Come on share your information if you have it. I mean wtf is the KGB gonna kill you if you tyell us more about it?? STop being so secertive and talk. That really annoys me. We have waited long enough if you know more than your saying then say it already, I am tired of guessing about this dam phone. |
Gustaf
Joined: Dec 07, 2001
Posts: 339
From: Sweden
PM |
I would like to know if it has the plug in the bottom as the Ericsson phones have had since the T28. |
Ruvjet
Joined: Mar 22, 2002
Posts: 268
PM |
This is the photo that everybody is saying is real, just to avoid confusion.
 |
hymie
Joined: Jan 11, 2002
Posts: 249
PM |
Wow! Rulez bigtime!
cheers,
hymie |
Caveman
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Posts: 168
From: Cambridge, UK
PM |
@Boinng: The silver is okay. I just cannot stand the pale blue  |
shawnmccall9
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Chicago, IL USA
PM |
P800 has covers being released soon, mineral grey and others too
|
thanasis
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: 204
From: London & Athens
PM |
The photo from the link cannot be viewed now for some reason! Maybe Sony Ericsson have noticed the leak and are trying to patch things up! If this is the case then it could actually be a genuine t610!
If only SE would bloody present their new phones! |
Ruvjet
Joined: Mar 22, 2002
Posts: 268
PM |
Quote:
|
The photo from the link cannot be viewed now for some reason! Maybe Sony Ericsson have noticed the leak and are trying to patch things up! If this is the case then it could actually be a genuine t610!
|
|
The phone can still be viewed by clicking on this link.
http://www.geocities.com/selfstackered
|
|
|
Posted: 2003-02-13 22:31
