| Author |
Shootout: C702 vs C902 vs N95 |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
@sowbran I'm talking about you posting unrelated images to this thread; C905 vs N82. Why not make another shootout thread between those? I for one am interested in it. What people can or can not accept is not really my problem. I just want a clean thread without fanboy wars. I'm sure both Nokia and SE make decent camera phones who both can produce very nice printed pictures and have different colour reproduction, lenses, etc, etc
And that is a good thing!
|
|
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-04-30 14:46:21, plankgatan wrote:
 (oohps...sorry Nokia)
100% crops
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 13:48 ]
The N95 shot is out of focus. Is that your point? |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
On 2009-05-01 10:14:47, AbuBasim wrote:
The N95 shot is out of focus. Is that your point?
I will retake that shot, pending the flower is still there
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2009-05-01 10:14:47, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2009-04-30 14:46:21, plankgatan wrote:
(oohps...sorry Nokia)
100% crops
The N95 shot is out of focus. Is that your point?
well, yes and no....my point is that Sonyericsson cams is better in macro, (more accurate focus) BUT in this case (if you look at the rest of the macro) also better colours.
and like i said, in THIS TEST Sonyericsson wins(again) (even c702 looks better then N95 (alias N82) in macro)..
c902 colour rendition is better and everything looks more natural then N95.
Pictures dont lies...it really shows such bad auto WB Nokia cameras have.... (maybe that Magazine shoot-out wasn't that wrong after all )
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-01 10:35 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
besides. N95 colours is often washed out (weak auto WB)
N95 (100%)
c902 (100%)
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-01 11:49:49, plankgatan wrote:
Very fitting. How you feel about Nokia camphones is just how some people feel about SE camphones. (Not me! I have two myself: P990i and K770i. And two Nokias: E61i and E90.  )
One man's meat is another man's poison...
|
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
Lol, the flower is still there, but for some reason I couldn't get a green "focus found" at the same distance as last photo on the N95, so I had to take a bit further away.
N95 ISO 100:
Full: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19447
So I also re-shot the same with the C902 from about the same distance.
C902 ISO 64:
Full: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19448
100% crops:
For some reason the N95 added a lot of colour that is not there in the image, normally the N95 is more bland with the colours than the SE phones, but today on this cloudy morning it's brighter. The C902 comes closest to the actual colour of the flower. But the N95 has more wow factor here.
I guess the noise levels are about the same in both pictures, it looks the N95 has less due to the brightness I guess. It seems the results greatly differ when the lighting conditions change.
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-05-01 12:03 ] |
nikolat
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 187
From: Serbia
PM, WWW
|
^^^
Great, they look the same but one is brighter.
On another note:
Can you guys stop debating like morons? The same people say the same things all the time. It's an endless circle.
I could understand some intelligent debate in between two parties, but this is just insults and responses.
[ This Message was edited by: nikolat on 2009-05-01 12:11 ] |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
I agree nikolat, even though the discussion/flames can be funny it doesnt contribute much. If anything this little shootout shows that all 3 camera's are decent shooters, who process images in different ways. With some tweaking of the levels all of the camera's will produce perfectly fine printable images, the differences are just in the processing of the images and the lenses used in the camera's of the phone.
Maybe some of the experts here can give an unbiased view on the pictures like; details, depth, etc, etc. Those things that matter.
I didn't intend this to be a fanboy or flame topic, but just another comparison thread.
|
Idou
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Posts: 24
From: dom. rep.
PM |
These are CAMPHONES for god sake!
As blerk said they all do a good job and they do what they are supossed to do, take decent pics sometimes.
They are not going to replace a dedicated digital camera so is pointless start to see the micro details to see wich one is better.
It's all to your personal taste as someone mentioned, if you like Cyber-shot interface and SE phones then buy C902 or C905, etc, but if you like Nokia, S60, etc then buy N82, N95 and don't worry they all have good cams.
|
sowbran
Joined: Jun 11, 2006
Posts: 158
From: Mexico
PM |
i degree that all the camera phones are good in diferent ways but i upload the pictures because others user cant acept that are another goods camera phones example i use the n82 for macro pics and the c905 for night pictures and all are very good phones.
On 2009-05-01 13:21:28, blerk wrote:
I agree nikolat, even though the discussion/flames can be funny it doesnt contribute much. If anything this little shootout shows that all 3 camera's are decent shooters, who process images in different ways. With some tweaking of the levels all of the camera's will produce perfectly fine printable images, the differences are just in the processing of the images and the lenses used in the camera's of the phone.
Maybe some of the experts here can give an unbiased view on the pictures like; details, depth, etc, etc. Those things that matter.
I didn't intend this to be a fanboy or flame topic, but just another comparison thread.
|
King9
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Posts: 53
PM |
1. Cybershot C902
2. Nokia N95
3. Cybershot C702
|
jbpudz
Joined: Feb 28, 2009
Posts: 32
PM |
I choose cybershot c902 for me
I  w910i|w200  k500|t100 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2009-05-01 12:24:12, blerk wrote:
Lol, the flower is still there,
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-05-01 12:03 ]
lol i lololol
i tried a "maskros" myself today with my c902, with a bit more "luck" it looks quite much better at least not this oversatured, painting colours as Nokia
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-03 16:24 ] |
.:TailS:.
Joined: Sep 30, 2008
Posts: 4
From: Croatia
PM |
I have C702, and I use it only for macro pictures. My friends have C902 and N95 8GB, and I can say that Cyber-shots are the best, but Nokia isn't bad. Nokia has Super-macro trick, which is really amassing. And BTW, i can say that C702 is worse 3.2 mp phone. I have K770 and C702, and I had K800, so IMO C702 is worst. C902 is better then K850, but however, it isn't as good as K800 is. For N95 I can only say it has good macro, but landscape pics are bad.
Sorry 4 my bad english |
|
|
Posted: 2009-05-01 10:02
w910i|w200
k500|t100
