Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is

Previous  1234  Next
Author c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is
RockHell
HTC Wildfire S
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Posts: 105
From: Scotland
PM
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Nice work man
Idou
T39 black
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Posts: 24
From: dom. rep.
PM
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-26 12:21:17, nikolat wrote:
Mizzle says they both suck, and everyone gets offended.


I'm very offended!! Ow, i think i'm going to cry because Mizzle said C902 and Ixus suck.

Entertainment Unlimited
Mizzle
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-26 16:13:07, plankgatan wrote:
we develop 503CW films (straight ahead) quite often, and they are amazing, just amazing



That comes from a guy who says the C902 camera is great. Excellent reference, you've got there!
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
thought it would be unnecessary to start a new thread...
anyway here some comparision by my c902 and Olympus FE280 8m.p.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

c902. iso-64. macro (EV 0.0)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

olympus. iso-50. macro
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

c902. iso-64. macro (EV 0.0)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

olumpys. iso-50. macro
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-26 20:41 ]
Mizzle
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
That's as useless as your praising words. Full size, please.
blerk
T100
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 00:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@plankatan
Looks like the lens on the Olymus has grease on it or something. Looks to smudged out or maybe you shake too much


Off topic:

On 2009-04-26 11:59:52, gtr83 wrote:
@blerk
So, are you already using an N95 8GB now?

Yep see here: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/index.php?uid=155655
N95 with 8GB microSD I prefer expandable memory over build-in, soon 16 and 32GB won't be that costly and I can just upgrade the memory. The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-26 23:38 ]
A To Z Feedback: [+18] - [-0]
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 10:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-25 19:39:06, QVGA wrote:
The pics they produce at 100% crops are just hopeless. So in low light you have an 'utterly hopeless' phone camera and a 'just hopeless' digital camera. I would not want either of those.



wouldn't want either of those ??? well, you already own a 'utterly hopeless' phone camera, (Samsung i450 is hardly some great shooter)...
that's self-irony in the big league.


besides, think ixus-85 looks good in full size for its size

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-27 10:18 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 11:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I wouldn't want either aswell, especialy the digicam at that price

http://www.trustedreviews.com[....]02/Canon-Digital-IXUS-85-IS/p1

Average compact cam pic quality, barrel distortion & purple fringing , limited dynamic range , i'd be pretty upset if i've paid over 100GBP for it.
davidtre
Model not set
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 15:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-26 09:34:23, Mizzle wrote:

On 2009-04-26 03:01:26, davidtre wrote:

On 2009-04-25 23:54:11, Mizzle wrote:
that doesn't mean that there are other and better options available.


That is to say that the same reasoning can be valid with your “professional equipment”


Obviously that should have said "that there aren't".


Do you have something like this?

http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/
Mizzle
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-04-27 15:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Of course.
davidtre
Model not set
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 16:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it
Idou
T39 black
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Posts: 24
From: dom. rep.
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 16:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Off topic:

On 2009-04-27 00:34:30, blerk wrote:

Off topic:

The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn



That is just too funny I can't stop laughing
Entertainment Unlimited
Mizzle
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-04-27 17:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-27 16:28:28, davidtre wrote:
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it


Nope. Besides, RED is not the industry leader.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-04-27 16:12 ]
blerk
T100
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 17:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
What is so funny, yesterday I went out and even when I use the screen to reflect the sun its still very readable, try that with any SE phone. Wonder if you even held a N95 in your hands and tested it.


On 2009-04-27 16:45:25, Idou wrote:
Off topic:

On 2009-04-27 00:34:30, blerk wrote:

Off topic:

The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn



That is just too funny I can't stop laughing

A To Z Feedback: [+18] - [-0]
davidtre
Model not set
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2009-04-27 19:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-04-27 17:11:43, Mizzle wrote:

On 2009-04-27 16:28:28, davidtre wrote:
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it


Nope.


Can your equipment shoot with a 28K module (sensor size mm 168 x 56 and 261 megapixel ) at 30 FPS? Nope.


Besides, RED is not the industry leader.


Red Digital Cinema Camera Company was founded in 2005, obviously they can’t be the industry leader.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi