| Author |
Nokia 3510i |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@ Manuela Id rather have the Siemens S55 it was £269 Sim Free, the 3510i is about £140 on Prepay and it doesnt do much.. S55 is betta, im not bothered about the display! its wot it does thats important. and the weight 2 lol thx 4 ur priv message!
This message was posted from a WAP device |
|
|
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@Miss UK, when are you getting your S55, before or after you join the dedicated S55 forum ??? or doesn`t it exist. |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@ Pachy. ive got the S55 had it nearly 3weeks! the Siemens topic is here somewhere lol
This message was posted from a WAP device |
orange
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: 397
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-01-13 15:53, haki wrote:
The sound chip of the T300 has to be much more expensive. The 3510i can only use a special kind of midi (sound) file that only Nokias use (I think it's called SP). The T300 can use ANY midi file, from any site, as a ringing sound.
|
|
Actually both of these phones support SP-MIDI. It's not "special kind of MIDI", it's an industry standard developed by MMA. Yes, the soundchip is more expensive in T300, since 3510i doesn't have a chip at all. Basicly the only difference is that 3510i supports polyphony of 4 and T300 polyphony of 24. |
bigkahuna
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 4
From: Kev Bloom
PM, WWW
|
I've just had a play with a 3510i and it is very nice, much easier to use than the 7210 and better looking than 6610
This message was posted from a T68i |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
bighakuna Please let us know more a bout 3510i??? please compare with 7210 display resulation and colour??? |
Swag
Joined: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
@ bigkahuna: you can't seriously mean that the 3510i looks better than
my 6610? No way! |
haki
Joined: May 14, 2002
Posts: 390
From: The real MACEDONIA in GREECE
PM |
@orange: Thanks for the info regarding sp-midi files.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
superman17
Joined: Oct 12, 2002
Posts: 145
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
...yup! know nk3530? it has the same colour display of nk3530.
[ This Message was edited by: SUPERMAN17 on 2003-01-18 12:52 ] |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
are there anyone out there ???who has 3510i ??? tell us how you like it |
ScottTUK
Joined: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 119
PM |
Yeah I got it today. Its a great phone (personally)
The poly tones aren't bad the screen is decent its not a bad phone at all! |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
this 3510i will sell good because its a nokia not much money and colour screen, but the people who have it will say, dude what a colour screen is this??? this new generation of phones suck, i'm going back to grey scalle phones.
if they would only open there eyes and look at the  phones they would see how great they are. |
monty2k
Joined: Jan 05, 2002
Posts: 24
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
Hi all,
I have a T300 and i've been playing arround with a 3510i.
I had a T68, I have also a 7650.
As much good as the colors are in a T300, the refresh rate is painfull! The 3510i screen is very fast. The resolution is way better in the T300.
For some ppl, more colors are better, for others good refresh rate is mandatory.
I had a t68 and loved it, till i got the 7650, so i couldn't use the t68 anymore (very slow). I bought a T300 because i had the oportunity of a great deal (I use always two phones, two networks), and i hoped that SE had taken care of the slowness of their phones, i was wrong, so i'm selling it now.
I have the combo T300+MCA25 and i can't use them together, to slow, brownish images on the T300 screen...
I wont buy a 3510i either because it has no connectivity of any kind, IR or bluetooth, and i love to change ringtone and screensaver all the time.
In conclusion, my opinion is that 3510i has a better screen.
--monty2k |
|
|
Posted: 2003-01-16 05:28
