| Author |
Nokia 6220 Vs Sony Ericsson C902 |
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: GMT +2
PM |
 I've been saying it for a while lately that the countdown has begun for SE. The downward spiral continues. To those who love SE so much please STOP making excuses and accept the reality- for the last two years SE just sucks!
I've been so loyal to SE since Ericsson until I had enough this year and moved on to another brand for the first time in 10 years. By the looks of things I made the best decision as it looks like it is still going to get worse.
Nokia have stepped up a notch and every other manufacturer is trailing far behind. If my new home (Motorola) doesn't provide me with a good smartphone I may yet still go to Nokia.
It's not what you do or even how you do it but in what state of mind you do it: Dups! 2009 |
|
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
I love it when SE fanboys bring up the "pic quality will improve with new firmware" argument. It cracks me up.
|
gola
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM |
Oh my, SE officially sucks big time...  to the dark side, seems like it's actually brighter 
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7 |
SE-Naz
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: LONDON
PM |
OK... if there is a chance when the retail version comes out it will improve...
Time is near and we will find out soon and do hope it does get better... I prefer  phones, always have done but at the present I am using a N95-8GB due to the K850i being so disappointing.... and the only handset I have is the K810i... which is probably one of their best...
Cheers
 ENJOY
_________________
SE Themes Section
A-Z of Trusted Traders (Esato)
A-ZoTT Home
[ This Message was edited by: SE-Naz on 2008-05-19 21:23 ] |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
I really do believe, that a Generic unbranded version of the C902, will be what we should judge the Camera by - not a PreProduction Test unit - come on guys - thats beyond a joke - and 'QVGA' - its not about 'Sony Ericsson Fanboys' - firmware always fixes bugs - I say judge on the retail version of the h'set!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
dualist
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: 98
PM |
On 2008-05-19 23:51:48, Sony α wrote:
I really do believe, that a Generic unbranded version of the C902, will be what we should judge the Camera by - not a PreProduction Test unit - come on guys - thats beyond a joke - and 'QVGA' - its not about 'Sony Ericsson Fanboys' - firmware always fixes bugs - I say judge on the retail version of the h'set!
Exactly - just common sense innit. |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
@dualist
Common Sense, seems only very few selected members here wish to use it...!!
Glad to hear you agree - after all, would anyone judge a car when its wrapped up with black tape and dummy parts, with test engines???
NO - so stop Judging the C902 with the same principles...
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
On 2008-05-19 16:34:03, GUCCI.011 wrote:
WOW! Nice one NOKIA  no matter how ugly the 6220c is it DOES NOT change the fact that NOKIA have better image quality. C902 doesnt look any better either
nah the c902 looks a lot better, but that doesn't change the fact that the image quality from is c902 is surprisingly bad |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Come on guys, while firmware updates MAY (read: probably not) fix the color issues, its never going to fix the horrible noise and purple fringing found due to using a poor quality and undersized sensor. Compare a crop from both cameras at 100% size
Nokia 6220:
SE C902:
Sorry, but that quality is just pathetic. SE has really lost it if they consider this "cybershot" quality. |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
My K790a takes better pics than that. That's why I don't believe this is a final unit for resale. |
Mige
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM |
I prefer the C902
[addsig] |
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
On 2008-05-19 20:41:00, dualist wrote:
These pics were obviously taken with a pre-release firmware and are bound to be poor. New firmware will inevitably improve the camera quality, as it always does with SE phones - there's no debating that.
The bitching in this thread is meaningless - if you recall, the quality of the photos in the K800i pre-release firmware was equally bad. We just need to be patient for a few months' for SE to perfect their camera drivers.
The only real topic worthy of discussion is why SE can't get their software right before launching new handsets, rather than their current model of releasing shabby firmware and effectively using their customer to beta-test the bugs out of it.
[ This Message was edited by: dualist on 2008-05-19 19:42 ]
I'm commenting on the BOLD one: Yes, it's worked for 3.2 MP camera and below, and NOT for 5MP. K850 proves otherwise.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
driftmania
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: California, USA
PM |
I prefer the C902
then you sir certainly need to correct your vision.
it's funny how people say that the C902 didn't come out yet, so that explains the quality of the pictures. but people don't seem to notice that the 6220 classic ALSO has not been released yet.
[ This Message was edited by: driftmania on 2008-05-20 03:37 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-05-20 04:37:05, driftmania wrote:
I prefer the C902
then you sir certainly need to correct your vision.
it's funny how people say that the C902 didn't come out yet, so that explains the quality of the pictures. but people don't seem to notice that the 6220 classic ALSO has not been released yet.
[ This Message was edited by: driftmania on 2008-05-20 03:37 ]
@Mr driftmania, he didn't say that he prefer C902 by judging the camera quality - perhaps he prefers it as a whole over the 6220 so don't put the words into his mouth 
Tbvh I am really pissed with SE's 5mp quality so much but that doesn't make me feel like going back to the dark side  there are still things that differentiates SE and Nokia - user experience. nokia may be the best in terms of camera and so on but having used to SE and finding it well fitting to me doesn't make nokia better in my eyes, and people outside this internet forum, i mean the normal people on the street finds a phone which suits them well - in fact most of my friends who owns N95 and N82 here doesn't know that N82 is the best imaging phone for this year and the best thing is that they don't use the camera that much
_________________
"Our Greatest glory is not in never failing - but in rising everytime we fall"
Are you good at drawing? If yes,then show us your talent! post your artworks here
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2008-05-20 04:34 ] |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
ok the c902 produces very bad photos (going by these images), so im 'assuming' have used a smaller/low quality unit as a result of the phone being 10mm thin.
The 6220classic is 15mm, so im also assuming the nokia has a larger/better quality (obviously judging from these pictures) unit
5mm is a lot in a phone, and im sure a better unit would have been used if the c902 were 15mm.
But its not, its 10mm, and now we have this shabby photo quality.
Life goes on...
ps. before anyone calls me a fanboy, im not defending im just saying that this MAY be the cause of the poor image quality. I'd be saying the same if the results were the other way around.
_________________
May the be with you!
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-05-20 04:52 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-19 21:03
