| Author |
Sony Ericsson C902 Cyber-shot discussion |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
yes i do. BUT w910 have one vantage, its ultra slim, but yes i do prefer smaller cell phones 
for me is the size of a cell phone really important (its just boring to have a big, clumsy phone in your pants), and second, who in hell watch there photos (or even worse, movies) on his cell phone ???
(watching movies on a 2.4" or 2.6" screen is ridiculous i think)
i watch them on my 17" laptop. there i at least see how the quality really is, etc.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
>
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-05 13:21 ] |
|
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-05 14:01:45, QVGA wrote:
You're saying that because you use a K810 which also has a minute screen. 2.0 is a joke and nothing else, nokia and samsung have them in their cheap low end phones. 2.4'' is the standard these days.
Uh, no, no aaand... no. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-05-05 14:07:16, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:04:50, bavlondon2 wrote:
Yeah but its just the way SE want to go down. The fact that they use it more doesnt mean everyone wants it. Im quite happy with 2inch screen to be honest as my phone doesnt double up as a hardcore video player for me. On the contrary whilst I have had big and bulky phones like the N93i I still prefer small and slim models.
Didnt you feel weird using a 2.0inch screen after using a P1?
No not really.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 14:18:21, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:01:45, QVGA wrote:
You're saying that because you use a K810 which also has a minute screen. 2.0 is a joke and nothing else, nokia and samsung have them in their cheap low end phones. 2.4'' is the standard these days.
Uh, no, no aaand... no.
yeah but you've never owned a phone with a big screen, have you?
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ultimatley its down to what you use your phone for. When I had my K800 it was just for pics so that was fine. When I had my N95 and N93i they were for pics and watching vids. I have an ipod now so dont need a phone with such a big screen. It should have really been at least 2.2 inches to keep it inline with the other current imaging flagship (k850) but there is nothing we can do about that.
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-05-05 15:51:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:18:21, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:01:45, QVGA wrote:
You're saying that because you use a K810 which also has a minute screen. 2.0 is a joke and nothing else, nokia and samsung have them in their cheap low end phones. 2.4'' is the standard these days.
Uh, no, no aaand... no.
yeah but you've never owned a phone with a big screen, have you?
How is that of any importance? |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 16:33:45, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-05 15:51:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:18:21, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-05-05 14:01:45, QVGA wrote:
You're saying that because you use a K810 which also has a minute screen. 2.0 is a joke and nothing else, nokia and samsung have them in their cheap low end phones. 2.4'' is the standard these days.
Uh, no, no aaand... no.
yeah but you've never owned a phone with a big screen, have you?
How is that of any importance?
Drop the wit and just answer the question. My point was since you've never used a phone with a big screen, you dont know what it feels like. I was fine with my W800 but since i used my N71, 2.0'' screens seem far too small to work comfortably with and thats the case with many many people.
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
QVGA can we all just agree that not everyone is automatically more satisfied with a larger screen. For others, other factors are more important.
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
@QVGA:
OK, but what has that got to do with the cam. being 5Mp and the screen 2"?
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-05-05 16:36 ] |
Tobbis
Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Posts: 16
PM |
I have owned both a 2,6"(m600) phone and 1,9"(k810). And i can tell you that i didnt get more satisfied with the 2.6", it only akes the phone bigger. The only thing i use my screen for is to see where in the menu i am, with contact that are selected and read text messages. And for those activites its not a big deal if you "only" have a 1,9" screen. |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Exactly. If the screen res in the bigger screen phones were say VGA then that would make a difference but as the previous poster says it just makes the phone bigger. If your watching videos then thats obviously different but for general stuff it doesnt make a difference.
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
I've used everything from 1.8 inches to 3.5 inches, and 2.2 is the optimal if you want both sharpness and size. What do you say now, QVGA?
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-05 18:21:09, Mizzle wrote:
I've used everything from 1.8 inches to 3.5 inches, and 2.2 is the optimal if you want both sharpness and size. What do you say now, QVGA?
Thats almost what i said, 2.4''. And there's a noticable difference in 2.2 and 2.0 |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
You do realise that there's a larger difference between 2.2 inches and 2.4 inches, than 2.0 inches and 2.2 inches, right? Let me remind you that you said that 2.2 inches is "nearly" 2.4 inches.
|
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
On 2008-05-05 14:10:54, plankgatan wrote:
have never understand the point with super big screens ?
as long i dont use my phone for TV & Movies, i much rather have a smaller cell phone (with a little smaller screen, like 2.0" or 2.2") who fits my pocket nicer then a big, clumsy phone.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-05 13:14 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-05 13:15 ]
Thats the biggest contradiction I have heard! You have said so many times you love the w960. What size screen is that? 2.6 inch. I guess thats just a clumsy brick aswell.. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-05 14:14
