| Author |
Number1 2.7 final k790/k800i/k810i camdriver |
mario06
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 73
PM |
On 2007-09-19 15:13:24, number1 wrote:
try 2.71 i added more colour
i have just tryed on a second k800i and i must say again that the colors are overexposed or the color is palid (lighter) then the actual subject anyway the sharpness is excellent.
ps. both of my mobiles are cid49
regards |
|
|
mario06
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 73
PM |
On 2007-09-19 15:13:24, number1 wrote:
try 2.71 i added more colour
Mr Number1 in your next release can you just give it a little touch of more color just a little bit wil suffice, thanks cause your the best
Regards |
IceCarpediem
Joined: Sep 04, 2007
Posts: 27
PM |
can't access gigasize.
Can anyone assist in uploading the driver to rapidshare?
I'm looking to test version 2.71 against kop's 3.3
thanks. |
IceCarpediem
Joined: Sep 04, 2007
Posts: 27
PM |
nevermind... it worked  |
IceCarpediem
Joined: Sep 04, 2007
Posts: 27
PM |
Here are comparison shots :
Indoor
Kop 3.3 no flash, auto focus, auto balance
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance
Outdoor
Kop 3.3 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV 0
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV 0
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV -0.7
Some how I find number1 2.71 getting over exposed, and setting the EV to -0.7 creates a too cool effect. Sharpness looks about the same to me, but being over exposed, on white surfaces, the minor details (on the white surface such as text and so on) gets kinda blurred. Yet to try flash mode. Will update accordingly guys.
[ This Message was edited by: IceCarpediem on 2007-09-20 05:25 ] |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
@IceCarpediem
dude, if you ever get the chance to compare a third driver which is the stock driver. itll be more like Number1's overexposure. it will be controlled by selecting Daylight in WB. and eventually lowering EV.
the resulting image will be alot better.
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
hellvy
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 42
PM |
On 2007-09-20 06:19:42, IceCarpediem wrote:
Here are comparison shots :
Indoor
Kop 3.3 no flash, auto focus, auto balance
...
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance
...
Outdoor
Kop 3.3 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV 0
...
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV 0
..
Number1 2.71 no flash, auto focus, auto balance, EV -0.7
..
Some how I find number1 2.71 getting over exposed, and setting the EV to -0.7 creates a too cool effect. Sharpness looks about the same to me, but being over exposed, on white surfaces, the minor details (on the white surface such as text and so on) gets kinda blurred. Yet to try flash mode. Will update accordingly guys.
[ This Message was edited by: IceCarpediem on 2007-09-20 05:25 ]
The indoor shots obviously show the jagged edge problem (on the rim of partition and.. notebook stand right?) Is it the effect of sharpnress increased?
And pls try night shots (with flash and no flash -: night landscape) when you availble too
|
The A team
Joined: Sep 07, 2007
Posts: 9
PM |
newby question but cameraDAT.0 is the driver for the 3.2 mega one and the camera.DAT1 is for the front camera correct? it was answered somewhere already but i couldn't find the post.
Also IFS\\SETTINGS\\CAMERA and away i go with xs++?
|
gprsman
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM |
On 2007-09-20 07:12:53, rockygali wrote:
@IceCarpediem
dude, if you ever get the chance to compare a third driver which is the stock driver. itll be more like Number1's overexposure. it will be controlled by selecting Daylight in WB. and eventually lowering EV.
the resulting image will be alot better.
the color is palid non real colors the camdriver number1 2.7 and 2.71 ,for me kopritis 3.3 the best .
regards.
[ This Message was edited by: gprsman on 2007-09-20 09:07 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
2.72
change log:
buffers changed
exposure lowered
colour lowered
VGA,1MP,2MP,3MP r compressed as normal on normal mode
V1
http://www.gigasize.com/get.php?d=pmcnmy14lhd
V2FF
http://www.gigasize.com/get.php?d=lj8pq7bwpld |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
can anyone compare 2.72 with some other |
The A team
Joined: Sep 07, 2007
Posts: 9
PM |
i took a sample video. You stated 24fps but it's actually 27fps for some reason. what is the log line anyway in the cameradat.0 file to modify it?
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
27fps it's set to 24fps but i find it sometimes gives 23fps,24fps,25fps,26,fps,27fps,28fps |
Alexandra
Joined: Jun 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nowhere Mobile: K800
PM, WWW
|
@ice
Those photos are terrible! Are you sure you used a K800?
[addsig] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
yea it's a cid:49 with older firmware for better pics u should update the firmware and upgrade to cid:52 |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-19 18:02
