| Author |
p800. big?massive?average?tiny?what? |
chungagoring
Joined: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Madrid, Spain
PM, WWW
|
(this is a reply to the original topic).
i can't understand why you keep wondering about p800's size. haven't you seen the photos? haven't you seen that it is exactly the same as the 7650??? just 1mm taller and 1mm less wide.
|
|
|
skjalg
Joined: Dec 08, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: B$rum, Norway
PM, WWW
|
If you wonder about the size of the phone check this flash movie: http://www.sonyericsson.com/se/images/CWS31AFW_7328_26_0_911.zip
the size in the movie is identical with the IRL size of the phone |
jamiescott
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Posts: 51
PM |
@ skjalg
lol, unthought out remark, either that or it is a brick, my 32" screen wouldn't change anything i assume then. It all depends on screen size and res |
skjalg
Joined: Dec 08, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: B$rum, Norway
PM, WWW
|
HMM.. i measured the phone on my screen with the actual size given on the SE site, and it matches! but of course, it depends on your resolution!  |
geoffreyw
Joined: Aug 15, 2002
Posts: 104
From: Texas
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-12-10 13:33, duncanb99 wrote:
Hmm,
the "3" handsets look nice, but do you really want to be a guinea pig for 3G?
Many analysts are calling it "too little, too soon". Initially speeds won't be much different to GPRS, although you will probably have to pay a large amount for the service.
Hutchinson is also thought by analysts to be heading for failure - the confusion over their so-called launch does not inspire confidence.
Dunc
|
|
I read an article yesterday (and I cant find the damn thing) where they showed that actual next generation speeds in the U.S. were still slower than at home dial-up. I think the P800 will be cutting edge for quite some time |
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
"crappy chess & warhammer" WTF are they, i play the property market, & i`m allowed to hate footy are`nt i ????? |
dumbdumb
Joined: Mar 22, 2002
Posts: 183
PM |
Hutchison didn't buy PCCW. PCCW bought Cable and Wireless Telecom Hong Kong. And Hutchison doesn't own PCCW...
and for 3, they did say they have problem with changing from 3G network back to GSM.. but said problem should be fine pretty soon.
P800 is too big for me. I played around with it here in ITU hong kong 2 weeks ago and its just too big. Yes it does have a lot of PDA fucntions but I never like using a PDA anyway. And without the flip, it is very hard to dial a number... its not that easy to "click" the numbers on the screen with your fingers. But I have to say the P800 does look smaller than the pictures and it is designed in such a way that it "looks" much smaller than the 7650.
So I guess I am staying with my T68 for now. This is the first phone that I still like so much after 13 months of use. Its just a phone that can't be matched... and I am never going to buy a phone without bluetooth again... unless there is something that can replace the BT headset...
cheers. |
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@dumbdumb i agree entirely with that last bit,as i have also had a t68/i for 14mnths, i will be looking at the p800 though as i am a PDA user, i make ALL my calls using the calling card service on the t68 & allthough p800 does have calling card services i`m worried that because it often involves individual number dialing (if the said number is not in phone book) that this may be awkward on the p800. |
jibuti
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: 220
From: Slovenija
PM |
I do not see the point being so hair-splitting about some existing or non-existing feature on P800....
for gods sake, it is the same thing like buying a car...U like the brand, U like a bit of shape, OK 307 is better than 306, Golf IV is newer than Golf III.....
How many of you would buy P800 WITHOUT label SE? It is Ericsson that hypnotizes you ( hmmmm,...us...).Would you buy big boxy Sony P800 if Ericsson had similar/better phone!!???...Nope.
Did U ever ask yourselves "what about Motorola menus?..."How many Motorola users visit Esato?!!...
US phones are like US cars.....And this is not a compliment...... |
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually i`m not a dedicated SE person at all,i want to spend my money the best possible way, when i buy a phone, a car or anything even food & clothes,i ask myself the same question, WILL IT IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF MY LIFE if i think it will then i buy it. the only reason i go into detail about a potential purchase of a p800 on here is because this is where people get info to help decide on a SE phone purchase,....or in short FO MF. |
jamiescott
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Posts: 51
PM |
@ jibuti
I've had 6 Nokia's and only 2 SE and they were the GA628 & the A1018 back in the day.... so try telling me why I'm buying a P800, then? It's obviously not the brand?!?!
and does anyone else love the way that Nokia can market themselves as a 30 phone a year company, even though they only really have about 4 different types of phone, which they change the look and the games every six weeks or so?!? |
brick
Joined: Nov 15, 2002
Posts: 162
PM |
jibuti:
You give techheads here less credit than they're worth. Besides looking at the brand, it would help you to actually READ about what the phone does. It might help you understand. |
jamiescott
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Posts: 51
PM |
[quote]
On 2002-12-12 09:04, jibuti wrote:
..........Would you buy big boxy Sony P800 if Ericsson had similar/better phone!!???...Nope.........
I really don't see how this helps your point? you're saying we're just buying into the brand, yet saying we wouldn't buy one phone if another is better??
Are you just doing the whole 'If i make no sense they won't be able to understand, and argue back?' thing? |
brick
Joined: Nov 15, 2002
Posts: 162
PM |
jamiescott:
It does seem that way doesn't it?  |
|
|
Posted: 2002-12-11 08:18
