| Author |
The first man on earth? |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
HaHa, and the meek shall inherit the earth, Peter kay  , IMO this life is not a rehersal so do all you can WHILE you can, im not taking any chances on the Almighty evening up any scores after i depart, though im stuffed for all eternity if my judgements out |
|
|
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-08-31 14:04:56, KingBooker5 wrote:
It dosnt matter if you believe in the old testement or not, way back, there were orginaly just 2 people, wether the names were adam and eve it dosnt matter, they had off springs, and it they all kept reproducing, all the way up to the present day.
It isnt a theory, lots of people consider it fact, you stem all humans back they must all originate from 1 man and 1 woman.
You know what that means? Every one is related in one way or another
I disagree with you kingbooker. Acording to the fist account that I have given, it is crystal clear that we can not all be related. Read through man.
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:30 ] |
Ridahz
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Manchester
PM |
On 2007-08-31 20:27:01, PeterKay wrote:
Its a good question Who came first on Earth etc, but does it really matter!!
End of the day, you eat, shit and die 
If you do good you will be rewarded and if you do Bad you will get punished, thats what i believe anyways 
Dont forget RE-PRODUCE
Ridahz Feedback +29 -0 Titanium Trader  |
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
[quote]
On 2007-08-31 20:38:12, comfort mdu wrote:
On 2007-08-31 14:04:56, KingBooker5 wrote:
It dosnt matter if you believe in the old testement or not, way back, there were orginaly just 2 people, wether the names were adam and eve it dosnt matter, they had off springs, and it they all kept reproducing, all the way up to the present day.
It isnt a theory, lots of people consider it fact, you stem all humans back they must all originate from 1 man and 1 woman.
You know what that means? Every one is related in one way or another
I disagree with you kingbooker. Acording to the fist account that I have given, it is crystal clear that we can not all be related. Read through man.
That means we are all related, if we are all ofsprings from the original humans. I dont get you. You say we are offsprings, but we aint related? It makes no sence. Your theory dosnt add up. If we are all ofsprings we must be related. There is no if or but to that
[ This Message was edited by: KingBooker5 on 2007-08-31 20:09 ] |
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
I am also quite sceptical that humans originated from primates.
In the days of the cavemen, they looked a lot like monkeys, there skelentons are also quite diffrent. About 3000 years later, there are the Egyptians. You cant evolve that quick in 3000 years.
I could be totaly wrong, unless some one could correct me |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
It's a matter of equating the balance of probability in your own mind booker, do you go with well documented evolution, or do you accept the concept of a supreme creator?, i go with the former, because the latter leaves open too many unanswered questions.
|
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
I dont know whats wrong about believing in a god and science. |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-08-31 20:57:18, Ridahz wrote:
Dont forget RE-PRODUCE
Oooops, sorry i meant "Eat, Shit, Re-produce and then Die"
|
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
On 2007-08-31 21:29:57, KingBooker5 wrote:
I dont know whats wrong about believing in a god and science.
It's quite smart to bet on both runners in a two horse race booker, you can't lose
|
yes_futur
Joined: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 101
PM |
Iam! Hehehe
This message was posted from a myV-55 |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-08-31 21:12:15, KingBooker5 wrote:
I am also quite sceptical that humans originated from primates.
In the days of the cavemen, they looked a lot like monkeys, there skelentons are also quite diffrent. About 3000 years later, there are the Egyptians. You cant evolve that quick in 3000 years.
I could be totaly wrong, unless some one could correct me
King whatever that wevolved was created by a supernatural power or force. That is where God and Science meet. Even if humans might have evolved from monkeys then we cn safely assume that the first man on earth looked more like a monkey. That is when God said let there be people.
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:43 ] |
msmmsm
Joined: Sep 03, 2003
Posts: 187
From: Edinburgh
PM |
Not a religious person so not sure about the following. If there was only Adam and Eve in the beginning, it would be logical to assume that inbreeding would be a nessecisity, and in modern times we see that only in a few generations cretinism and other genetic defects are very apparent through inbreeding. Considering the age at which they lived in the bible back then( up to 900 years so I am told), thats a lot of offspring. Also told by my Christian Girlfriend that the world is only 6000 years old! Thats a lot of inbreeding if it is possible in any way to get to our current population.
I dont agree with any of the above, but it's an interesting point. |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
I get what you are saying. What surpises me the most is you all dont seem to mention the first account of the creation of man except for Goldenface. The difference I see here is that Adam was the first thing called human to be created by Gods hands. With those he created at first he just commanded and things hepaned. If adam was the first man according to the last poster, are you saying that inbreeding amongst humans is leagally or religiousely right? I doubt that
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:52 ] |
Jim
Joined: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Humans and apes have the same ancestor but WE DO NOT evolved from them!!! Don't compare us with something that is totally different.
This is a wide misconception of evolution and most creationist base their arguments about something totally wrong.
I highly recommend to read the Miller experiment. If you know basic chemistry and biology then you will understand how organic compounds needed for life could have been formed with basic inorganic elements. |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
So who do you guys say the first man was. Im just being so inquisitive because I would like to know how we analyse what we read in the history books as far as the Bible is concernsd
_________________
You live today and die tommorrow. So why do you have to wait for the unknown if you do not know the author of life. Grant me everlasting wisdom from above
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:59 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-08-31 20:37
