| Author |
7210 better than T68i...sorry |
Jeeves
Joined: Nov 06, 2002
Posts: 10
From: Antipolo City
PM |
My perfect phone is the T68! |
|
|
Longshot
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 26
PM |
Color n software better in n7210 than se t68i, but both too cute n small for my long fingerr n larg hands, but i must say t68i s sturdy. N7650 s complete n fits wel for me but looks like a brick, i gues il stick wid my t68ì n upgrade to a new phone nxt 1st or 2nd qtr 2003, watch out for n6100 7250.
This post was posted from a T68i |
Longshot
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 26
PM |
Color n software better in n7210 than se t68i, but both too cute n small for my long fingerr n larg hands, but i must say t68i s sturdy. N7650 s complete n fits wel for me but looks like a brick, i gues il stick wid my t68ì n upgrade to a new phone nxt 1st or 2nd qtr 2003, watch out for n6100 7250.
This post was posted from a T68i |
diddy0071
Joined: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 187
From: (near Sacramento) Arbuckle
PM, WWW
|
All I have to say, is you loved your T68i, and you gave it to your girlfriend. I don't give a f**k how close someone is to me, I love my phone to death, and I wouldn't contemplate giving it to ANYONE. Not my mom, dad, brothers, NOBODY! So obviously, you didn't like the phone that badly, or else you wouldn't have paid the moderate amount of $$ just to give it to someone.
~~~*~~~*~~DIDDY KONG~~~*~~~*~~
"Not just another good looking MOFO!"
|
peterjulian
Joined: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 19
From: North America
PM |
t68/p800 rules...watch 'die another day' n youll see why. a year old yet still the preferred cel of 007 film. nokia? |
deepsweech
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Posts: 23
From: Manila
PM, WWW
|
ive been a T68m/i user for almost a year now, im a heavy IR/BTooth/WAP/email/SMS/MCA20 user but it seems T68i(with its upgrades) is too old now. Ive been waiting for the P800 since june but the question is NOW. I need it NOW. so.... i bought the 7650.
my personal comparison?
7650 is better feature/speed wise. no offense for SE users since iam before but i think 7650 really is like an upgraded T68i. Its quite bulky but the +features like builtin cam justifies it.
Dont Compare 7650 to T68i please coz there's no point of comparison since T68i is old now.
SE Solution? Release the very pre rated P800
then when the really battle starts!  i may replace my 7650 with this one. if its worthit
|
deepsweech
Joined: Sep 17, 2002
Posts: 23
From: Manila
PM, WWW
|
@peter
regarding the movie. SE pays Bonds movies for the very good advertisemnts. They're using SE since it was just an Ericsson bfore. for Nokia, they advertised in Minority Report if you noticed. movies are not really grounds for comparisson =)
|
fu|at^t68
Joined: Sep 14, 2002
Posts: 365
From: Selangor, Malaysia
PM |
yeah, don't compare. it's ya choice to decide 
|
forceabuser
Joined: Sep 11, 2002
Posts: 108
From: holland
PM |
Did you look at the mms software is only supports text and pictures nothing else and is is about 100 more expensve
This post was posted from a T68i |
Deltayoda
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Los Angeles, California
PM |
I think the camera sucks both for Nokia and  . Such lousy pictures, somewhat blurry, and odd colors. I am looking for a digital camera with an IR port or bluetooth, since it's possible to transfer images anyways via IR and bluetooth on the T68i (There's even an option for an IR Camera image transfer). So I'd much prefer to use a high resolution camera than a piece of crap that costs so much that for the same price I can get a much nicer digital camera.
I like how the 7210 acts, but it's so limited in so many other ways. The JAVA is useless (Nothing special about it). Don't give me that bullshit story about how it can help a carpenter calculate stuff, the JAVA is too limited on Nokia phones. If you just want fast SMS and fast menu's, get a Siemens. It's pretty logical that it's going to be faster since there's really nothing in the software. As for the 7650, it has some nice menu's and features (Plus you can actually download useful software, but still to small and limited), but the thing is a brick.
As for my T68i, I use many features, except for MMS (I think it's one of the most useless feature ever on any phone). I use bluetooth for my IPAQ and the IR port for things that don't use Bluetooth. It's a much better combo than a PDA phone. The only thing I really hate about the T68i is the keypad. Why does it have to click and be so hard to press? Not even the T39 had a keypad this hard. My fingers start hurting after a while if I write too many SMS's, especially going over that number 5 key with those little bumps.  |
peterjulian
Joined: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 19
From: North America
PM |
@deep
i know that. anyway, i hope 72xx will stand the test of time as t68 has proven its worth. |
dal_l
Joined: Mar 23, 2002
Posts: 97
PM |
I keep hearing about 'big memory on the T68 .. blah .. blah .. can store photos ... blah ... blah'. What is the use of big memory when you cannot install new games? What is the use of storing photos when they sucks on the 256 colours screen?! Have you tried MMS on it?! It sucks! I couldn't even see the picture .. all brown and yellow! If you have a BIG phonebook then probably yes, the BIG memory is for you. But other than that I am sorry .. this 'memory agrument' is stupid ... I am using the T68m Gold for a long time and I know its limitation. |
dal_l
Joined: Mar 23, 2002
Posts: 97
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-11-26 23:49, MrSavoy wrote:
Ya the 7210 is better, it's better at being a kids toy. Nice colors they have. Looks like a crayola crayon. The screen is better? For a screen with 4k colors is does a horrible job, other 4k screen phones look much brighter and better. The battery is better? Wrong. T68's battery lasts longer. Better looking? NO T68 has a sleeker and nicer form factor, much classier. You arent using BT? Your loss, once you have used a BT phone you will never wanna be without one again.
|
|
Well ... that's the way to survive. If sales reports of mobile manufacturers are anything to go by, 80% of the world are kids Could be your boss, MD, the postman .... the 4K screen is ok by far ... too bright .. the batt. will be dead in no time. YES! The batt. on the 7210 lasts longer than the T68 .. my sis has the 7210 and I can attest to that. I am using the T68m ... mind telling me what have I been missing (about BT)?
[ This Message was edited by: dal_l on 2002-11-27 15:52 ] |
faca
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Posts: 192
PM |
Quote:
| I don't give a f**k how close someone is to me, I love my phone to death, and I wouldn't contemplate giving it to ANYONE. |
|
Oh my God... I can't believe someone actually said that. You love your phone to death!?! Oh my God...
|
faca
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Posts: 192
PM |
Quote:
| t68/p800 rules...watch 'die another day' n youll see why. a year old yet still the preferred cel of 007 film. |
|
The preferred cel of a 007 film!?! You think the film makers chose t68/p800 because they think those are the best phones for James Bond?  Those devices are only shown in the movie because SE payed $xxxxxx to film producers. And SE must invest a lot in marketing of a year old phone, because they simply aren't capable enough to produce a new cool phone. |
|
|
Posted: 2002-11-27 05:11
