| Author |
Post a picture (and video) taken with your N95 (nokia) |
awave
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: United Kingdom
PM |
On 2007-04-18 01:04:09, apolloa wrote:
Also don't forget more megapixles does NOT mean better photos.
probably the best advice in the thread  - phone cameras are for quick happy-snappies - go for a decent camera for other shooting. i use a fuji s5600 and it's a heck of a lot better than that but about 2 years out of date now (although it's pretty new - decemberish time bought). is a pretty much happy-snappy camera but also does some seriously good make-shift studio photograph (although not as good as the canon 1d i got to use! *gasps*! lol!)
edit: personally i would say that the pictures i've taken of flowers with my  v600 (1.3mpx old old old) are comparable to the quality of those pictures shown there (only the flowers)
_________________
Phones: V600i, PalmOne Treo 650 + lots of t200s! + a t20 + a t18!
I being an fan!  I DO being a 3 dude NOW!!
[ This Message was edited by: awave on 2007-04-18 00:31 ] |
|
|
voda_jon
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
dont forget this is release firmware that these pics are coming from!!! the quality will improve with time and once ppl are used to changing the settings from auto to manual an having a mess around...
The N95 isnt very good at depicting blues as a colour and as such the sky always looks a little washed out or purple in colour... this is being fixed by nokia in their next FW release and will make the pics look amazin!!!
And comments about stand alone cameras being better are a load of bull!!! You are comparing somethin that is purpose built for a specific task against something that is built for multi tasking!!!
As far as a phone goes this is prob the best at the current time! |
below24
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM, WWW
|
Not sure why there are people in this thread moaning about the camera. This is about sharing photo's.
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
actually I disagree.
Since the beginning of camera phones and camera attachments, these threads have always started out discussing the quality of the images and how to improve them with the settings available
later, once that technical discussion died down the threads became places to share photos with a little technical discussion continuing
|
below24
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM, WWW
|
Well ok then.
|
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Masseur take more pictures of Germany will ya 
Btw nice shot's people keep those coming
An "Apple" a day keeps the Doctor at Bay! |
whentheleveebreaks
Joined: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 390
PM, WWW
|
Embankment gardens this morning. Im so happy with the cam on this phone, really good.
Posted from an iPhone |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
some of the colourful goodies in our snack machine in the office (sorry, bit of reflection there)
full size
edit: @whentheleveebreaks, very colourful and reasonably good depth of field!
_________________
Unless I'm very much mistaken...
reviews: i-mate V800 K700
[ This Message was edited by: masseur on 2007-04-19 10:30 ] |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
@whentheleveebreaks
Fabulous photo, shows how good the camera really is. Thats the sort of image quality I'd expect from a 5Mp.
|
whentheleveebreaks
Joined: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 390
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-04-19 11:50:15, carkitter wrote:
@whentheleveebreaks
Fabulous photo, shows how good the camera really is. Thats the sort of image quality I'd expect from a 5Mp.
and its been resized to 800x600, at full resolution it still looks pretty damn good.
Getting closer to my stand along digital cam
Posted from an iPhone |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
can I suggest that people write any settings they have used when they post a pic as it might give some of us less able, a clue or two on how to improve our pics 
so far, mine have all been on default settings
|
whentheleveebreaks
Joined: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 390
PM, WWW
|
Mine have been also on the default setting
Posted from an iPhone |
below24
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM, WWW
|
I have found that the light sensor affects the photo also. Its difficult to see the light exposure with just the basic screen.
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
I'd really like to know how to use the white balance setting.
Here's some advice on the 'rule of thirds' to help compose pictures:
http://www.esato.com/board/vi[....]ic=145211&start=15#post1957245
|
Red_Rach
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 424
From: Manchester, UK
PM |
Im rubbish with cameras so I have no idea what half of the settings mean and therefore just keep the settings as auto, I even do this on my main camera! |
|
|
Posted: 2007-04-18 01:29
