| Author |
Nokia future models for 2007 (n-series and more) |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
why we need this here on esato 
OnePlus 8 |
|
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
We need it, cos its more then enough free space for discussions, nokia deserves some topics here and many of us are interesting in other brands development
This message was posted from a 6233 |
dr_thug
Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-06 14:52:19, sasha-SE wrote:
why we need this here on esato
|
|
Yeah....this should be in the Garbage Threads 
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
imo its more simple not to read it if no interest...
on topic, the only communicator i saw once looked like a psion, imo it was a fake info
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@stef - Nice report/info on the firts page dude !
[addsig] |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-06 12:29:29, BobaFett wrote:
A full symbian communicator would be really interesting to see. It drove me crazy, that 6680 and 9300 didnt communicate
This message was posted from a 6233
|
|
Your forgetting that Symbian OS is the Achitecture while the S60/S80/UIQ2/3 are the platforms. 6680 = S60 2nd Edition FP2/3 while 9300 runs on S80 platform. They dont communicate period and shouldn't expect to unless contacts sent/received in .csv format. But I understand where you're coming from.
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-06 14:52:19, sasha-SE wrote:
why we need this here on esato
|
|
Competition is needed and should be respected. Does anyone really think the P800/900/910/990 would've debuted this early if the Nokia 9300/9600 a which is giving the P990 a run for its money on stability. Form factor though should be abondaned - cannot get much slimmer without sacrificing build strength.
Without competition then a company or person does not evolve at a steady pace OR without a direction in it evolution. |
mustafabay
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Egypt
PM |
@Dogman
Actually Mobile Review are correct, the only thing extra to what you said is that the name will be E90. Where Mr.SE read his info on M-R beats me.
I don't want a signature anymore. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
some n95 vids
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=nokia+n95&so=0&start=0
|
Dogmann
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: London England
PM |
@mustafabay
Sorry but you are also wrong as i have seen a review of this device prior to Nokia getting it pulled it will NOT be a Series 80 device. This review was not on some dodgy website either it was by a well respected member of the Symbian community that is just awaiting Nokia's announcement to re publish an updated review of this device. It will run S60 3rd Edition FP1 and if you can prove otherwise please do.
Marc
Blackberry Bold, V4.6.0.214, 8GB SDHC, Pin2553F455
Honoured to have Won Best Debater for the 2nd Year |
LasseMan
Joined: Nov 22, 2002
Posts: 103
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
Couldn't agree more with Dogmann. Everything points at S60. |
|
|
Posted: 2007-01-06 14:52
