| Author |
OMG! I can't believe my eyes! |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-13 10:49:38, QVGA wrote:
K800's screen isnt anything special. It looses to D900 and QVGA screens from Nokia.
|
|
. . . No ONE beats, Samsung when it comes to LCD display (CLARITY) !
[addsig] |
|
|
QuickShare
Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM |
agreed 
My Flickr Site.. Flickr.comMost Popular Newbie 2006  |
mervy
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Dubai
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 00:56:49, sapporobaby wrote:
@mervy
My question was more along the lines of: "you know what you are getting" rather than actually questioning your photography prowess. In other threads in this forum people tend to have misconceptions about functionality verses fact. Example: the jump from 2 to 3.2 megapixel will hardly be noticeable, however, make that very same jump from 2 megapixel to say, 5 and above and you will see a marked difference. I was also trying to point out that all in one devices are crippled by virtue of their design. They are good at many things but do not excel at any one particular thing due to the compromises that are built into the design. As for the k800i, it is an okay phone/camera/media player in my opinion. I went from a w800i, to a w810i, to the k800i all in the space of 2 and a half months but in the end, I think the k800i is better. I have an M600i as well that I prefer to my k800i as the camera is not really a major attraction for me.
|
|
Hmmmmm. I get it buddy.
Proud owner of a t610, W800 & Satio. |
schumy_f1
Joined: Oct 07, 2006
Posts: 16
PM |
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
[ This Message was edited by: schumy_f1 on 2006-10-14 09:07 ]
sry 
[ This Message was edited by: schumy_f1 on 2006-10-14 09:08 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 09:54:50, schumy_f1 wrote:
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
|
|
Look at what? |
mervy
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Dubai
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 09:54:50, schumy_f1 wrote:
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
|
|
I dont think u have posted any links. Pls chk.
Proud owner of a t610, W800 & Satio. |
schumy_f1
Joined: Oct 07, 2006
Posts: 16
PM |
what do you say ?
I think are quite good |
mervy
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Dubai
PM |
Yes Yes, they are definelty good. But do u have a w800 with u. coz i want to see the comparison of the shots taken by both at the same time.
Also i have a feeling that the k800 was defective. But to prove that i want the comparison side by side.
Thnks |
schumy_f1
Joined: Oct 07, 2006
Posts: 16
PM |
I don`t have the w800 anymore but I can say to you that if you`re interested in taking good pictures and less music you should choose k800 but if you`re interested in listening music you should pick w800/w810 because k800`s sound really SUCKS;k800`s output level is very low.For this reason I want my w810 back and I think I`ll sell my k800.It`s a pity SE made this to SE`s fans.Now you have to choose music(W) OR pictures(k-cybershot).K750 was best mutimedia phone(music AND pictures) so they should let intact that great sound from k750-same with w800/w810. |
mervy
Joined: Nov 01, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Dubai
PM |
I want the best of both worlds but not a nokia. So i guess i can get ma bro the w810 for now and wait for the next REAL successor to the k750/w800.
Proud owner of a t610, W800 & Satio. |
schumy_f1
Joined: Oct 07, 2006
Posts: 16
PM |
yep |
sapporobaby
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM |
@QVGAI notice that you did not bother to answer my question about the iPod. Let's assume you were wrong (proven), and that you stand corrected (proven once again).
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
N82(YES), iPhone 3G, Shure es530, Nikon D300, more stuff. No more SE stuff, why am I still here? |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 13:38:25, sapporobaby wrote:
@QVGAI notice that you did not bother to answer my question about the iPod. Let's assume you were wrong (proven), and that you stand corrected (proven once again).
|
|
You didnt ask anything. You told me to check apple.com which i did. And wrong about what? |
sapporobaby
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 13:54:31, QVGA wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-14 13:38:25, sapporobaby wrote:
@QVGAI notice that you did not bother to answer my question about the iPod. Let's assume you were wrong (proven), and that you stand corrected (proven once again).
|
|
You didnt ask anything. You told me to check apple.com which i did. And wrong about what?
|
|
You stated that you have not seen 80gig iPods anywhere, which implied that they do not exist. Naturally with your implication, by default I would be lying. Finally, I stated that just because you did not know about 80gig iPods does not mean they do not exist. Anyway, no matter.
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
N82(YES), iPhone 3G, Shure es530, Nikon D300, more stuff. No more SE stuff, why am I still here? |
jepherberich
Joined: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 473
PM, WWW
|
one suggestion tho, if people would post comparison pics, we should be getting more accurate comparisons if we actually get links to full-res images. post them in imageshack or something. directly posting them on the board downsamples the actual shot.
|
|
|
Posted: 2006-10-14 01:05
