| Author |
which mobile phone has the longest talk time? |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@boba - OK, thanks !
[addsig] |
|
|
xerx
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
Posts: 375
From: New York City
PM |
5110 i guess
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Maybe (in my own observation) those handsets which have more than 4 'bars' in the case of the Nokia brand . . . lasts longer. I have a Nokia 6510 then and having the original battery on it the stand-by time (when fully charged) lasts for a week, with minimal calls and sms . . .
[addsig] |
vrl29
Joined: Dec 25, 2004
Posts: 305
From: Philippines
PM |
i think many factors affect the phone's talk time and probably standby time. phones with less features require less battery consumption, and the reverse is true for those phones with jampacked features. we also have to consider the phone's screen, as it is activated most of the time you use the phone.
SE T68i (Feb2004-May2004)
SE T610 (Sep2004-Jun2005)
SE K700i (Jun2005-Sep2005)
SE S700i (Sep2005-Present) |
optiplex
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Posts: 220
PM |
In my experience Motorola C115 beats them all; a basic non color phone with a 920mAh battery, lasts more than a week !.  |
Matteus
Joined: Oct 20, 2002
Posts: 372
PM |
I had a Startac before T39m. The battery capasity was excellant some 8-12 days! The 2-battery system was wonderful, too. But T39m was even better with the highcapasity battery. But most often I use T39m with two batteries, one between my creditcards!
Waiting T39m revival so hard.
Quote:
|
On 2006-01-13 16:38:13, CrackerJack wrote:
I would say the Motorola Startac. It has two batteries. One is situated on the back of the phone and a smaller battery on the flip.
_________________
INTEGRITY
Without it...
Everything else is irrelevant.
With it...
Everything else is irrelevant!
[ This Message was edited by: CrackerJack on 2006-01-13 15:41 ]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2006-01-13 22:46
