| Author |
K850i vs N95 pic quality |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
my k750 takes better pictures then both ( better quality + sharpness)
zoom 100% picture from k750 and from k850/n95
k750 will eat them...
OnePlus 8 |
|
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
u mean in 2mp mode? didnt see any k850 pix yet in 2mp...
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-11-07 13:06:22, BobaFett wrote:
u mean in 2mp mode? didnt see any k850 pix yet in 2mp...
No. Because people have been busy showing off their 0.45mp K850i shots.
|
mongoose3800
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM |
On 2007-11-07 13:25:13, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2007-11-07 13:06:22, BobaFett wrote:
u mean in 2mp mode? didnt see any k850 pix yet in 2mp...
No. Because people have been busy showing off their 0.45mp K850i shots.
LOL. I nearly fell of my chair!!! |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2007-11-07 13:05:35, sasha-SE wrote:
my k750 takes better pictures then both ( better quality + sharpness)
i agree (a little)...i have a old k750 as well..(have maybe 50-60 saved pictures from that phone)...i was looking at some old 750, w810, k800 & k810 pictures last night....i didnt see so big different between k750 and w810.
k750 & w810 (whit original software) take realy good daylight pictures..(but the indoor & flash is much worse)
here is my best k750 pic i have..(if you want i have it full size to)
i get better colors & sharpness with my k850 , BUT IT NEED MORE WORK...k750 is "just aim and shoot"...k850 is more sensitive.
(if you want i have it full size to)
im plaesed with my k750 & w810, BUT i realy miss a real flash, Bestpic and some more important functions....thats why i use my k850 for the moment....i also have to wait for the summer to take this amazing sunset summer pictures....(i never going to sell my k750, w810...they are fun to have in the future) 
_________________
I  k850i,  w810i &  T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-11-07 13:06 ] |
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@plankgatan
Yep that's what i've been saying all along: K850 i a little bit to sensitive so it's a bit harder to just point and shoot to get a sharp photo. It can, off course, be done if you hold it really still(it's not that of an effort). But i think after a new firmware it will be better.
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-11-07 13:44 ]
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-11-07 14:48 ] |
REO
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: U.S.A.
PM |
@ mongoose
Guess what? I'm not going to post my W810 pics with 2.0 MP and AF.
Here is my S710a 1.3 MP with no AF.... Let's see a NOKIA 1.3 do this.
BY THE WAY.... IF YOUR GOING TO complain about resizing, click on the link below... the full resolution is even better : )
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=70267&start=1215
_________________
W810 / 4.0 GB SanDisk
[ This Message was edited by: REO on 2007-11-08 01:37 ] |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
I thought this thread is about K850 vs N95 photo.
hmm...The evidences must be so conclusively stacked against K850 (that it has a worse cam than N95  ) that SE fans now find the need to bring in their K750/800, W800/810 and S710 photos to the fight. 
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-11-08 02:04 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
i guess it shows SE has the potential, but fails to use it. |
mongoose3800
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM |
On 2007-11-08 02:21:28, REO wrote:
@ mongoose
Guess what? I'm not going to post my W810 pics with 2.0 MP and AF.
Here is my S710a 1.3 MP with no AF.... Let's see a NOKIA 1.3 do this.
BY THE WAY.... IF YOUR GOING TO complain about resizing, click on the link below... the full resolution is even better : )
_________________
W810 / 4.0 GB SanDisk
[ This Message was edited by: REO on 2007-11-08 01:37 ]
Hey! you've missed my point. I have said the K750/W800 shots look just as good minimised as the K850. I'm not surprised your 1.3 shots look good. And, I'm not surprised they look good at full size either. I even posted photos from a W800 as proof. My whole point is that the K850 shots are very poor at full size and that is therefore not a very worthy 5mp camera - in my opinion. Others disagree and that's fine with me. |
elementz
Joined: Aug 27, 2004
Posts: 56
PM |
wow, u guys still at this. faintz. I think all these aren't going to be conclusive. Sometimes N95 is better, sometimes k850i is better. Also depends on the photographer.
Just taking a look at these two pics, I can't see the details on the number plate in the N95 pic, but can at least figure out something on the number plate of the k850i. Though i must agree the purple fringing and colors of k850i in this pic seem bad. Looks over-exposed.
The photos from Plank are definitely better than those on the websites (even the shrunk photos are better than the shrunk photos on this review site).
|
elementz
Joined: Aug 27, 2004
Posts: 56
PM |
Out of curiousity, I took a look at that review website. See the following 2 pics:
N95
http://mobilarena.hu/dl/rev/2007-09/1716/n955.jpg
k850i
http://mobilarena.hu/dl/rev/2007-09/1716/k850i5.jpg
Clearly, k850i is much much better, and I can also say it puts to death the argument that N95 is better.
I'm pretty sure many people will argue that N95 is capable of taking a better quality pic than that shown here. I would also agree, becos I've seen better pics from the N95.
So at the end of the day - what's the point!! |
kreacher
Joined: Mar 24, 2006
Posts: 254
PM |
^ There's no point actually because no one will never get everyone to agree on the winner 
Anyway I hope the next K850 firmware improves the picture quality in whatever areas its lacking. SE's Cyber-Shot flagship phone should be the clear winner in any camera comparisons (specially after being delayed so much), even being a winner by a small margin is not good enough. |
Dextrr
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Posts: 279
From: New York
PM |
On 2007-11-08 05:54:50, elementz wrote:
Out of curiousity, I took a look at that review website. See the following 2 pics:
N95
http://mobilarena.hu/dl/rev/2007-09/1716/n955.jpg
k850i
http://mobilarena.hu/dl/rev/2007-09/1716/k850i5.jpg
Clearly, k850i is much much better, and I can also say it puts to death the argument that N95 is better.
I'm pretty sure many people will argue that N95 is capable of taking a better quality pic than that shown here. I would also agree, becos I've seen better pics from the N95.
So at the end of the day - what's the point!!
I guess all you'll be doing with your K850 is take MACRO shots?! |
ac
Joined: Feb 09, 2003
Posts: 316
From: India
PM |
Its EXTREMELY UNFORTUNATE that SE forgot to provide a WORKING FLASH (i'm referring to the flash sync problem) in their 'flagship' phone...
I picked up K850i yesterday taking a chance that the flash sync problem with not be there in October stock. My first shot proved me wrong.
I was so disgusted that I returned the K850i immediately. incurring a loss of about US$100 in the process and picked up a Nokia N95 8GB.
I agree that the K850 has a better camera but flash sync problem is UNACCECPTABLE. I am really disappointed with SE this time.
I fact, this is probably the most euphemistic post I've ever written online... the kind of words I wanted to use to describe my experience would have had me banned from Esato for ever.
|
|
|
Posted: 2007-11-07 13:05
