| Author |
Sony Xperia Rumors 2015 |
rss_ndrsn
Joined: Aug 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Thanks goodness! Z5 Compact should have Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 7420 (lol)... |
|
|
penguino
Joined: Apr 05, 2015
Posts: 221
PM |
I found E5663 in GFXBench database and there were T-Res onscreen and offscreen results. Surprisingly it seems that Sony managed to squeeze much more out of the same processor than HTC:
Still nothing crazy - Adreno 330 posts the same results, Snapdragon 808/Adreno 418 still seems to be a better choice (rumored S6 mini is getting more and more attractive).
[ This Message was edited by: penguino on 2015-06-27 23:40 ] |
Jamzy
Joined: Jun 24, 2015
Posts: 143
PM |
On 2015-06-28 00:36:33, penguino wrote:
I found E5663 in GFXBench database and there were T-Res onscreen and offscreen results. Surprisingly it seems that Sony managed to squeeze much more out of the same processor than HTC:
Still nothing crazy - Adreno 330 posts the same results, Snapdragon 808/Adreno 418 still seems to be a better choice (rumored S6 mini is getting more and more attractive).
[ This Message was edited by: penguino on 2015-06-27 23:40 ]
Your forgetting the Htc E9+ has a 5.5" 2k Screen compared to a 1080p screen in the 4.6" E5663...
Hardly comparable. |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2015-06-28 00:36:33, penguino wrote:
I found E5663 in GFXBench database and there were T-Res onscreen and offscreen results. Surprisingly it seems that Sony managed to squeeze much more out of the same processor than HTC:
http://s12.postimg.org/kd0z6z0q5/bench.jpg
Still nothing crazy - Adreno 330 posts the same results, Snapdragon 808/Adreno 418 still seems to be a better choice (rumored S6 mini is getting more and more attractive).
[ This Message was edited by: penguino on 2015-06-27 23:40 ]
Good find, will be interesting how this phone will be placed, since the camera is the new sensor, IMX230 and the chip features 480fps 1080 video which is pretty good.
here is a demo of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j0gCXjHuKQ
The SoC also features:
Integrated, low-power hardware support for H.265 Ultra HD (4K2K) video record & playback
Which could mean there is a 4K recording in a high mid range phone from sony, this is supported by the 3840 x 2176 back cam video resolution. Looking forwards to this device, if priced right, could be a good deal, assuming it is made available for europe.
|
nodarsixar
Joined: May 22, 2013
Posts: > 500
From: AD
PM, WWW
|
Snapdragon 820 Geekbench
NO |
penguino
Joined: Apr 05, 2015
Posts: 221
PM |
Still no 7420 killer? Shame. On the other hand first results from SD620 weren't thet great either (single core around 700, multi core - ~3100).
On 2015-06-28 12:33:23, Jamzy wrote:
Your forgetting the Htc E9+ has a 5.5" 2k Screen compared to a 1080p screen in the 4.6" E5663...
Hardly comparable.
Display size doesn't matter at all, offscreen test scales everything down to FHD resolution. |
nodarsixar
Joined: May 22, 2013
Posts: > 500
From: AD
PM, WWW
|
this is firs test
NO |
josephnero
Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Sanford North Carolina USA
PM |
@penguino
Yep.now
Single=1513 multi 4051 for 620
http://www.phonearena.com/new[....]sive-benchmark-results_id70785
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2015-06-28 14:27 ] |
thetube
Joined: May 06, 2015
Posts: 207
PM |
On 2015-06-28 14:16:01, penguino wrote:
Still no 7420 killer? Shame. On the other hand first results from SD620 weren't thet great either (single core around 700, multi core - ~3100).
On 2015-06-28 12:33:23, Jamzy wrote:
Your forgetting the Htc E9+ has a 5.5" 2k Screen compared to a 1080p screen in the 4.6" E5663...
Hardly comparable.
Display size doesn't matter at all, offscreen test scales everything down to FHD resolution.
1732 points vs 1486 points on Single core seems like a threat to me. |
ascariss
Joined: Apr 06, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
here are the geekbench results for the new 620
https://browser.primatelabs.c[....]earch?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=msm8952
comparison with the SD808
https://browser.primatelabs.c[....]earch?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=msm8992
comparison with the SD810
https://browser.primatelabs.c[....]earch?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=msm8994
I searched for the SD820 on geekbench but no MSM8996 showed up, unless it was deleted or I am searching wrong. |
penguino
Joined: Apr 05, 2015
Posts: 221
PM |
About SD620. Maybe I'm wrong but its first results were worse because at first MSM8952 was meant to have 8xA53 cores (what we know now as SD420), hence the performance was similar to SD615.
http://juggly.cn/archives/140310.html
About both 620 and 820. I noticed that their multi-core performance is slightly "sluggish" compared to single core scores. Usually multicore score was about 3-3,5 times better than single core (Exynos 7420 is even better - x3,66). SD810 was at the bottom of this range (single core multiplied by 3) but that's probably because of thermal throttling. Thing is - SD620 and 820 appear to be even worse. In the 620 multicore score is single core x2,66 and in the 820 - x2,89. It seems like they can't even use 3 cores at the same time. I hope they're going to fix this before they start mass production. |
josephnero
Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Sanford North Carolina USA
PM |
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_[....]phones_in_india-news-12833.php |
nodarsixar
Joined: May 22, 2013
Posts: > 500
From: AD
PM, WWW
|
S6 vs Z3+ heat test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlnlW6sOP7w
s6 vs Z3+ speed test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmzVGuajBv0
winner Z3+
NO |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Not at all related to 'rumours'.
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2015-06-29 11:50 ] |
josephnero
Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Sanford North Carolina USA
PM |
Good find nodar.Sammy fans and sony camera bashers will not be happy.Z3+ destroys s6 in lowlight here.but lets continue in Z3+ thread
[ This Message was edited by: josephnero on 2015-06-29 12:04 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2015-06-28 00:08
