| Author |
Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2007-12-24 10:03:48, faidz85 wrote:
Genus 5.8 - All auto
-
Genus 5.9 - All auto
-
Ultimate v1.0 VividColour
-
Number1's 2.92
Sorry about the scene...it's my backyard...I'm liking 2.92 for now. Although ultimate vivid is not that bad, the FF function really made me think twice.
I tested under automatic cause that's what most people would do in their everyday photo snapping.
You be the judge.
The worse pics I had ever seen. How could you make it so ugly? OMG |
|
|
EduX
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 92
From: Slovakia, Bratislava
PM |
@genus:
I enjoy using Your new driver. Thank You.
@Genus and number1 and other modders
Thank You for Christmas gifts for us. Thanks for the hours spent by developing great drivers.
Merry Christmas to all.
_________________
K810i debranded, new centur`s dispdriver, Peter's HiFi v2, Genus 5.9/Number1 2.92 camdrivers
[ This Message was edited by: EduX on 2007-12-24 19:37 ] |
Vit
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Posts: 279
From: Brazil
PM |
I simply cannot see the point in taking pictures with dif camdrivers in Auto Mode and then comparing then.
What do modders work for? I guess they all want to make the best out of the camera, and that is CLEARLY NOT achieved by always using Auto Mode.
IMO you people should get pictures at the maximum quality you can get with each camdriver and then trying to compare them.
One suggestion for modding:
I agree that 08 for sharpness is beyond our needs, but what about something just above shapness 02? Perhaps 04-05 should improve our pictures' quality.
FOR INSTANCE, TAKE A LOOK AT KOP 2.7 WITH 08 SHARPNESS. AT THE WALL IT SEEMS TO HAVE MORE DETAILS THAN GENUS' AND NUMBER1' PICTURES. PERHAPS IF SHARPNESS IS TOO LOW PICTURES MAY LACK DETAIL.
ANOTHER THING IS THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S ALL THAT FUSS ABOUT NUMBER1' LATEST CAMDRIVERS. HIS 2.7 WAS CLEARLY THE BEST IN TERMS OF COLOUR REPRODUCTION, BUT AFTER THAT ALL HIS WORK SEEMS TO ADD SOME BLUEISH ASPECT TO THE PICTURES. I WOULD NOT GO FOR HIS 2.9.
TO ME THE BEST CAMDRIVER WOULD BE A MIX OF N1 2.7 COLOUR REPRODUCTION + GENUS MANUAL FLASH ISO AND SUPERNIGHT MODES + SHARPNESS SOMEWHAT BETWEEN 4-5.
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
i made 4x crops of them pictures, i used my k800i to crop the pictures
genus 5.9 (sharpness 02)
number1 2.92 (sharpness 01)
ultimate vidid (sharpness 08)
|
Vit
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Posts: 279
From: Brazil
PM |
@ Number 1:
Your pic has a low level of detail. I agree that a sharpness value of 08 is way too high, but 01 is the just the opposite. |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2007-12-24 21:54:04, Vit wrote:
@ Number 1:
Your pic has a low level of detail. I agree that a sharpness value of 08 is way too high, but 01 is the just the opposite.
Too high? I cannot imagine these pics better...
Ultimate Driver will always remain at Sharp 08 
Merry Christmas ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 |
diawollo
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
Posts: 31
PM |
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
On 2007-12-25 00:23:45, diawollo wrote:
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best
Is this even a battle?  |
a_amirfarzam
Joined: Dec 03, 2007
Posts: 62
PM |
Hi to all
I test and compare this tree camdriver:
2.92 Number1
5.8 Genus
1.0 Ultimate
and after it i fix the colors with photoshop CS and in end i see the
all tree driver have take the yellow wish color in all .
In this tree driver the yellow wish effect is little in 1.0 ultra one .
Now how can we fix this issue ?
@Modders
Can you compare your driver photo with fixed one with PHOTOSHOP colors ?
and now the photos :
2.92 Number1
5.8 Genus
1.0 Ultimate
Photoshop edited colors
|
mpasanthosh
Joined: Aug 28, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
Hey i think number1 2.92 cam driver is good ithas good colour reprodution...
It would be better if he could fix the Best pic bug..
[ This Message was edited by: mpasanthosh on 2007-12-26 07:49 ] |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2007-12-25 03:05:11, G-Izzat wrote:
On 2007-12-25 00:23:45, diawollo wrote:
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best
Is this even a battle?
This is not a battle! We are here for helping each other. Do not demotivate people with these comments please!
Just choose best driver for you.
|
EduX
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Posts: 92
From: Slovakia, Bratislava
PM |
Yes, You are right. It is not a battle. The more people, the more ideas for best result.
K810i R8BA024, Centur`s dispdriver, Peter accoustic HiFi v2, Raiderski 6.3u camdriver |
danekro
Joined: Nov 23, 2007
Posts: 34
PM |
now i think that genus 5.8 has a really colour,and number one has a bit of brightness in his cam driver... |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
On 2007-12-25 21:57:32, danekro wrote:
now i think that genus 5.8 has a really colour,and number one has a bit of brightness in his cam driver...
Have you tried the Vividcolour camdriver by jomateixa? And also genus 5.9? |
genus
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: 385
From: Malaysia
PM |
I see so many discuss abt the sharpness??? So how did you all opinion about the sharpness???
Actually no matter how sharp is it, the jagger alrdy there in the picture taken wif k800i, more shaprness juz make it more noticeable only.
@number1
So, which sharpness setting we should prefer???
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-26 07:05 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-12-24 13:59
