| Author |
N1 C702 & C510 camdrivers |
pakhusin
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM |
may i know what would be the changes in ur camdriver?
what aspect u gonna improve from n1's camdriver then?
erm, can you improve autofocus accuracy? |
|
|
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
I think maybe can changes noise in his camdriver= 3 =
And changes shutter speed!!→It's so slow,this can makes my photo bad= 3 = |
ranen
Joined: Mar 29, 2009
Posts: 8
PM |
the link u gave me didnt work bro 
|
Mr.Kája
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Posts: 180
PM |
ds934118: To get lower noise, you need longer shutter speed...it will be always compromise...
Nowadays, I'm enjoying Elm, fw R7BA076. And here camdriver database for k750/w800/w810: www.camdrivers.wz.cz  |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
Longer shutter and lower ISO value didn't solve noise problem, it is coz small aperture we have in hardware. |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
Actually to be honest, yesterday I tested shooting the same scene (a well lit room, exposed to sunlight) with both my phones and C702 came out with a better pic. Surprising! |
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
@gtr
What did you mean? C702 vs C905??
My camdriver have been already to test. Check se-indo.net at member project forum.
@all
It will be announce here soon in this week for testing purpose.
@pakhusin
Buffer size and compression taken from N1 camdriver, and add constant saturation and WB color correction hope could produce real and rich color and minimize yellowish picture. |
pakhusin
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Posts: 277
PM |
@code
i've tried ur camdriver, to be honest,
the picture seems out of focus.
maybe on phone review looks okay, but not screen monitor.
|
code28h4p
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Republic of Indonesia
PM |
please post your comment on my topic please. |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
Yup C905 VS C702. C905 runs the standard 2.7 driver while C702 is on N1 3.3 beta. |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
Where can download N1 3.3 beta??
I want to test.
It will be fuzzy that C702 shoots the middle distance photo
I want to 3.3 can changes this!! |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
In this thread, but a few pages back. Also if the link doesn't work anymore, I can send you via email. |
ds934118
Joined: Apr 04, 2009
Posts: 43
PM |
Thank you!!
I already find that^^ |
Mr.Kája
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Posts: 180
PM |
code28h4p: I thought it generally...of course, it's problem to get lower noise with faster shutter speed...that't is what I said a I don't see reason, why it should not be true.
Yes, c702 has problem with bad aperture...at k750 it works perfectly. here, it can make little better pics, but it's still bad. Question is, what is problem to solve... we don't get pics like from k800, or even k750...but we can try to improve.
Throught day, c702 (as well as c510) need longer exp. times than k800 to get picture with the (quite) same light and ISO, thx. hardware. (and when you are indoor, differences can be huge...so somtimes, there is no chage to take pics. from hand) So, we can't do much in this.
At night, sometimes, I would like to have scene longer times with ISO about 400 bu rather 800. I have reasons for it..
Anyway..he wanted faster shutter speed and lower noise....when you use faster shutter speed, you get darker picture...and if you need the same looking pict, you have to use higher ISO - and get more noise. I'm sure, that now it's clear, what I thought.
[ This Message was edited by: Mr.Kája on 2009-04-08 13:44 ] Nowadays, I'm enjoying Elm, fw R7BA076. And here camdriver database for k750/w800/w810: www.camdrivers.wz.cz |
yesno
Joined: Apr 12, 2009
Posts: 33
PM |
which cam driver is better
ive got C510 but its slighly yellowish
any idea |
|
|
Posted: 2009-04-07 13:16
