| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
bbjuju
Joined: Mar 20, 2006
Posts: 81
PM |
For the naming of the camdrivers: Can they be named in a more systematic way? There are two out without names but are called a_version_with_some_modifications_based_on_k800_driver, one with overexposure removed and one without.
Can aksd give them some names, just a suggestion (say, camdriver0.5.43.1.dat and camdriver0.5.43.2.dat). Especially, for the download link, I think it's better they have different names instead of just camdriver0.dat. I have more than 30 drivers in my camdriver folder and all called camdriver0.dat. I managed to give them different names but just for one version number, there are a few variants and I lost track totally.
Please pardon me if it's just my own problem. |
|
|
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
so aksd ,the 2.41 cam driver is the best till now? |
QuickShare
Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM |
hey mo... i mean bbjuju  i agree with your statement there .. tag the link to make it more easier to understand 
My Flickr Site.. Flickr.comMost Popular Newbie 2006  |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Hi aksd,
v 2.43b is almost as 2.41. fokus sometimes doesnot work.
zoom and macro is ok. close distance could be better, blured.
distance shoot seems ok for the night .
video is ok. day pictures same or little better than 2.41.
overexposured on the strong light, with brigtnes -0.7 it is ok. |
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
@ arinrin
maybe u can compare between 2.41 and 5.6c.... !!!! 
  800i R1BC002 |
oHaYo
Joined: Sep 04, 2006
Posts: 66
From: Thailand
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 09:09:17, aksd wrote:
http://rapidshare.de/files/33885444/camdriver0.dat
And this with over exposure removed.
RRocky these are jsut demonstrations to learn about some mew stuff from K800...the qualtiy sucks but we can build up on them
|
|
so is this driver based on K800i ?
or just 2.43 with some tweak ?
now i'm a little confuse too hehe ... |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 09:51:44, imsje wrote:
Hi aksd,
v 2.43b is almost as 2.41. fokus sometimes doesnot work.
zoom and macro is ok. close distance could be better, blured.
distance shoot seems ok for the night .
video is ok. day pictures same or little better than 2.41.
overexposured on the strong light, with brigtnes -0.7 it is ok.
|
|
you can post the pictures ,and to compare the 2.41 with 2.43 b?:) |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Tory
my opinion is that v2.41 is better, second opinion?
i am at work , hard to change drivers, but belleve me, v2.41 is better at all.
cheers
i am waiting aksd with new driver based on the K800. |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 10:06:31, imsje wrote:
Tory
my opinion is that v2.41 is better, second opinion?
i am at work , hard to change drivers, but belleve me, v2.41 is better at all.
cheers
i am waiting aksd with new driver based on the K800.
|
|
also i cannotz change now drivers and to see the difference between 2.41 and 2.43 and this with k800  ( |
stingjoel
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Posts: 265
From: Indonesia
PM |
I think the latest driver is based K800...but over exposure, so Aksd release the no over exposure... |
QuickShare
Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM |
ok guys.. don't get panic.. i finally get the whole picture about the 2 sudden pop-out Camdriver.. it's the same driver just a tweak on the overexpose problem..
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 08:44:02, aksd wrote:
The K800i driver has been a huge help in understanding the K750 driver better. Now we can practically do anything with the driver where sharpness.......contrast and exposure of driver is concerened.
Stuff like Resolution and buffer size is dependant on the kernal ie OS so that cant be changed....wil demonstrate with a driver in a few mins.
http://rapidshare.de/files/33884631/camdriver0.dat
|
|
This Camdriver above was the first attempt based on K800 drivers..
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 09:09:17, aksd wrote:
http://rapidshare.de/files/33885444/camdriver0.dat
And this with over exposure removed.
RRocky these are jsut demonstrations to learn about some mew stuff from K800...the qualtiy sucks but we can build up on them
|
|
and This above was After spotted the overexpose problem and fixed.. it's still the same Camdriver based on K800 drivers.. so don't get confused
My Flickr Site.. Flickr.comMost Popular Newbie 2006 |
gxg
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 270
From: Romania
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-20 20:17:36, heins wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-20 20:16:35, aksd wrote:
I dont touch the video recording. I keep it at 15fps anything more and you strain your processor.
|
|
Ok, is that the same as for the 5.6 series drivers??
|
|
Heins .. man.. woman... TESTER... WHATEVER ..
I think you cannot comparte eman's drivers with akshay... because DHAAA!!! AKSAY made it.
so.. stop asking him what he took from 561.. stop ask anything. just post the test results and stop comment arrownd other things. let's keep this thread ontopic and try to focus on camera drivers.
If you wanna test.. OK.. if you don't wanna.. stai sit, relax and read others results before asking stupid questions.
@ E' man - don't be offended abot those posts.. keep goin' because you STILL have something to say.
@ Akshay... good work man... I'm testing your driver wright now... also don't take it personaly with those unprofesional and unfair comments.
@ HEINS... man.. how can you ask the man who develop the driver as it is.. if he took something from e_erezan... when erezan develop his drivers on basis of 272 and 241.... don't be nosey... stay foot.. and don't post stupid questions. THINK TWICE MAN! |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
oka nice
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-09-21 09:34 ] |
QuickShare
Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM |
@ToryXX
thanks mate
_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com
Most Popular Newbie 2006
[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare™ on 2006-09-21 09:37 ] |
heins
Joined: Sep 05, 2006
Posts: 152
From: Norway
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-21 10:32:51, gxg wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-20 20:17:36, heins wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-20 20:16:35, aksd wrote:
I dont touch the video recording. I keep it at 15fps anything more and you strain your processor.
|
|
Ok, is that the same as for the 5.6 series drivers??
|
|
Heins .. man.. woman... TESTER... WHATEVER ..
I think you cannot comparte eman's drivers with akshay... because DHAAA!!! AKSAY made it.
so.. stop asking him what he took from 561.. stop ask anything. just post the test results and stop comment arrownd other things. let's keep this thread ontopic and try to focus on camera drivers.
If you wanna test.. OK.. if you don't wanna.. stai sit, relax and read others results before asking stupid questions.
@ E' man - don't be offended abot those posts.. keep goin' because you STILL have something to say.
@ Akshay... good work man... I'm testing your driver wright now... also don't take it personaly with those unprofesional and unfair comments.
@ HEINS... man.. how can you ask the man who develop the driver as it is.. if he took something from e_erezan... when erezan develop his drivers on basis of 272 and 241.... don't be nosey... stay foot.. and don't post stupid questions. THINK TWICE MAN!
|
|
Sorry about my stupid questions guys, i have read every single pages since page 1 the last few weeks, and i am very happy you guys understand what your doing, i am still stupid when it comes to camdrivers, but i see clearly what is good and what is bad, and i dont complain.
I am more than happy to test out new drivers for you guys, and since i live on the other side of the world, it is maybe daylight here when you have completly darkness.
C901. |
|
|
Posted: 2006-09-21 09:49
800i R1BC002
