| Author |
Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
damn,is it a fake?Btw heres the exif
Exif IFD0
* Camera Make = Sony Ericsson
* Camera Model = C905
* Picture Orientation = normal (1)
* X-Resolution = 72/1 = 72
* Y-Resolution = 72/1 = 72
* Software/Firmware Version = R1BA027 prg1205-9079_GENERIC_SI 00.00
* Last Modified Date/Time = 2008:07:17 08:16:16
* Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) = co-sited / datum point (2)
* Custom Rendered = normal process (0)
* Exposure Mode = auto exposure (0)
* White Balance = auto (0)
* Scene Capture Type = standard (0)
Exif Sub IFD
* Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/250 second = 0.004 second
* Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 280/100 = F2.8
* ISO Speed Ratings = 64
* Exif Version = 0220
* Original Date/Time = 2008:07:17 08:16:15
* Digitization Date/Time = 2008:07:17 08:16:16
* Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
* Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/100 = 0
* Metering Mode = center weighted average (2)
* Flash = Flash did not fire, auto mode
* Focal Length = 591/100 mm = 5.91 mm
[ This Message was edited by: se_dude on 2008-09-26 10:05 ] |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
?
before  release the full generic ("alfa/orginal") software, it allways miss some parts inside the exif data.
this is the real deal...its just different cam drivers on different pictures on different forums.
_________________
I C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 09:41 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-26 10:12:04, plankgatan wrote:
this quality is far better then every i-mobile902 or N82 pics ive seen... very pleased to see as the new King  (again )
So I guess since the photo wasn't from a C905 then it's no longer the king?
Sorry, couldn't help teasing a bit. I just thought it was strange that you didn't compare with other SE camphones, like you were revealing which ones you actually considered the best 
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-09-26 09:46 ] |
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
No more doubts then...  |
marcink
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 121
PM |
source:
http://a.img-dpreview.com/gal[....]preview/originals/img_0451.jpg
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
this new cmos sensor can really handle low light.
the night quality is outstanding best ive seen
(going to move them to the low light thread)
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 09:50 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-26 08:44:30, Hiron wrote:
To look full-size, click The Image...
Couldn't believe this... Got from E-Mail... R1BA027:
So who sent this to you?
|
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
@marchink,
Actually, I got it emailed from my friend... I even dunno the real source/courtesy... If this is the real deal, I'm so sorry. They're looks almost the same, except slight hue difference... 
But I'm confused, since the EXIF says like se_dude said...
And about three other macro pics I've got, I couldn't find it in that preview... Could you pointed me out? 
Hiron |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
like i said...different cam drivers on different pictures on different forums...
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-26 10:05 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-26 10:56:35, Hiron wrote:
And about three other macro pics I've got, I couldn't find it in that preview... Could you pointed me out?
Those macro shots look like regular C905 shots so most likely not fake.
|
rustam07
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: 175
PM |
Someone cheating us !!!!!! (((( |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
the macro shots are from flickr.
|
Hiron
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Denpasar - Bali, Indonesia
PM |
Plank, you posted full-size that makes this pages layout kinda strange 
Err... Just curious how EXIF data can be changed the way like this? Could it be the reviewers brings out two camera together? I felt color and image portion difference... Or maybe I could asks my friend to make it clear, since he is my schoolmate
Again, I'm so sorry. My bad
Hiron |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
it's not a big problem with many EXIF editors around 
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Yes clearly the Ice-Cream truck is a fake. I wouldn't trust any of the others from that same email.
EXIF information is easy to change, that's the problem. The other problem is sad people trying to make the phone out to be something it isn't.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-09-26 10:32
