| Author |
Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
^^^ditto ditto
|
|
|
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
twin sisters .. taken by virgile at flickr
Nokia N8 |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
I know people who obtained the Innov8 sim-free for £399.95, i would really love a confirmed similar price on the C905 to make a direct comparison on VFM and price related abilities, it's crucial IMO that we see links to full size pics by C905 taken by people we know and trust, those people i know who have test models really ought to be a lot more forthcoming with opinions on all matters relating to it too.
|
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-22 16:27:41, naveedaziz83 wrote:
twin sisters .. taken by virgile at flickr
Too much noise IMO...Not a good shot.wheres the better quality that c905 will have in low light pictures??? |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Better quality in low light relates to its Xenon Flash, which you wouldn't use in this situation.
It's not the best picture anyway, cause it isn't even in focus. Just a quick snap of two fantastic cars.
On 2008-09-22 16:36:06, MWEB wrote:
I know people who obtained the Innov8 sim-free for £399.95
Would love to know where! I can only see prices of around £500. The C905 is on Play.com sim-free for £400, so that price on the Innov8 is a bargain.
_________________
I can't think of anything to write here...
[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-09-22 16:32 ] |
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-22 17:28:57, marty mcfly wrote:
Better quality in low light relates to its Xenon Flash, which you wouldn't use in this situation.
It's not the best picture anyway, cause it isn't even in focus. Just a quick snap of two fantastic cars.
agreed... |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
I agree. Both that it's just a quick snap and not a good example, and also that they are two fantastic cars! 
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-22 17:08:24, masada1971 wrote:
On 2008-09-22 16:27:41, naveedaziz83 wrote:
twin sisters .. taken by virgile at flickr
Too much noise IMO...Not a good shot.wheres the better quality that c905 will have in low light pictures???
Yes, exactly. Here not even shrinking to 800x600 can hide all the noise.
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
my question is what shutter speed was used? If you could manually choose a low shutter speed, say 1/15 or even 1/8, this picture may look alot better.
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
1/13s
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-22 08:32:38, plankgatan wrote:
im glad C905 followed C902 example with NO manuell ISO. manuell ISO settings on cell phones suxs. it makes more bad then good 
Sorry to disappoint you, plankis, but the whitepaper (dated June 2008) clearly says on page 42 that manual ISO indeed is available: 100, 200, 400 or Auto.
It wouldn't make any sense with SE to announce the flagship Cybershot 8 MP camera phone and then have it stripped of so much functionality that it becomes more basic than a 50 dollar budget P&S digicam. As it is now, it still lacks some functions like manual adjustment of sharpening (Nokia has it )
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-09-22 17:07 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
would be nice to see option to select camera functionality: basic (current) and advanced (additional manual functions). something new under Cyber-shot brand. ehh, just dreaming 
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
On 2008-09-22 17:43:19, max_wedge wrote:
my question is what shutter speed was used? If you could manually choose a low shutter speed, say 1/15 or even 1/8, this picture may look alot better.
Would be nice, but even my new Panasonic TZ-5 won't let me select shutter speed manually  My old Cyber-shot did though
|
harry20larry
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Posts: 338
PM |
On 2008-09-22 17:33:37, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-09-22 17:08:24, masada1971 wrote:
On 2008-09-22 16:27:41, naveedaziz83 wrote:
twin sisters .. taken by virgile at flickr
Too much noise IMO...Not a good shot.wheres the better quality that c905 will have in low light pictures???
Yes, exactly. Here not even shrinking to 800x600 can hide all the noise.
Take a picture with any compact digi cam, without flash, and i'll bet you have similar noise levels to this phone. I know it not perfect, but compared to the k850 where this photo would look like a dot drawring, i think it does quite well |
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
samsung innov8 510 british pounds sim free ... play.com
http://www.play.com/Mobiles/M[....]/Product.html?searchtype=genre
c905 ... 400 british pounds sim free ... play.com
http://www.play.com/Mobiles/M[....]/Product.html?searchtype=genre
a full 110 pounds difference ...
Nokia N8 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-09-22 16:21
