| Author |
N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600]) |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
n82 gives more natural colours when working with the flash.
I remember the sofa photos awhile back, comparing the K850 and a digital camera. Could you post the digicam photos in comparison to the n82 and K850? I can clearly remember the digicam photos looking rather similar to these n82 shots.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2008-03-10 00:27 ] |
|
|
shanespencer
Joined: Aug 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: The China
PM |
On 2008-03-09 20:35:46, se_dude wrote:
...which is achieved by the new k850 firmware even in auto settings
Strange. That wasn't achieved on my K850 when I upgraded to 031. Colour reproduction was still awful.
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
I see many comparisons here with an auto setting.
I don't understand why in any comparison like this people take pics with the auto settings. Isn't it wiser to shoot with each camera's best setting so you really know which cam is capable of doing the best thing?
Since the settings itselves is there in the phone for a reason and not to be wasted, right? If you're gonna take all your pics with an auto settings, the rest of the settings is better thrown away at all.
[addsig] |
n4d3r
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: 86
PM |
On 2008-03-10 01:21:39, soane28 wrote:
n82 gives more natural colours when working with the flash.
I remember the sofa photos awhile back, comparing the K850 and a digital camera. Could you post the digicam photos in comparison to the n82 and K850? I can clearly remember the digicam photos looking rather similar to these n82 shots.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2008-03-10 00:27 ]
There  this one is by Canon sd400 5mpx camera
 |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
I think the K850 pic is closer to the real color of the sofa (as shown by the Canon taken pic), but the loss of detail/saturation in K850 pic is just too pity. N82 shows better details from what I see.
[addsig] |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Take a look at the following latest comparo to see more comparison photos between N82 and K850 (and G800).
http://smape.com/en/reviews/s[....]meras_N82vsG800vsK850-rev.html
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2008-03-11 03:10 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
this one looks like a mobile -"proto"- review....
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
I can take much better pics with my K850 than the pics on that review.
But don't get me wrong, I always think that N82 is better than K850. And still think the same way. Coz N82 simply is.
The point is.. I just feel that I can take much better pics than the K850's pics taken for the review. Really.
Anyway.. why a review always uses the auto settings? Really don't get it. You have many many possibilities of settings with your camera, and you just use the auto settings? Isn't it a waste? For me, it's much wiser to use each camera's best setting. With that, people who read will know what the maximum capability of each device is, then the review isn't biased.
[addsig] |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-03-11 04:13:09, BobaFett wrote:
this one looks like a mobile -"proto"- review....
dont get you here. It has a G800 in the review and if I remember correctly by the time G800 came on the market, K850 is already "old"  . So how can this be a "proto-review".  If you check the review was done recently.
@amras
Like you can use manual settings to take better picture for K850, I can also use manual settings on the N82 to take even better picture than K850. One thing you cannot changed is K850 has smaller sensor and worse lens than N82. And no amount of "manual" can hide this handicap .
|
driftmania
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: California, USA
PM |
On 2008-03-11 06:42:49, Amras wrote:
I can take much better pics with my K850 than the pics on that review.
But don't get me wrong, I always think that N82 is better than K850. And still think the same way. Coz N82 simply is.
The point is.. I just feel that I can take much better pics than the K850's pics taken for the review. Really.
Anyway.. why a review always uses the auto settings? Really don't get it. You have many many possibilities of settings with your camera, and you just use the auto settings? Isn't it a waste? For me, it's much wiser to use each camera's best setting. With that, people who read will know what the maximum capability of each device is, then the review isn't biased.
because they usually make the reviews for people that are just looking a good point and shoot cameraphone. when i take pics with my K800i, i just point and shoot, maybe take a second or two and set the white balance and i just take a pic. |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-11 07:09:55, mib1800 wrote:
On 2008-03-11 04:13:09, BobaFett wrote:
this one looks like a mobile -"proto"- review....
dont get you here. It has a G800 in the review and if I remember correctly by the time G800 came on the market, K850 is already "old" . So how can this be a "proto-review". If you check the review was done recently.
@amras
Like you can use manual settings to take better picture for K850, I can also use manual settings on the N82 to take even better picture than K850. One thing you cannot changed is K850 has smaller sensor and worse lens than N82. And no amount of "manual" can hide this handicap .
Sure but the N82 with manual setting won't be as much different to K850 with manual setting. IMO.
The point is.. I can shoot better pics than the pics taken with K850 on that review. Looking at the images taken with flash, it's so dark. It suppose not to be like that. And many things on the reviewer's pics that make me think that I can take better pictures with K850 than the reviewer. That's all.
But did I say, N82 was worse? In the contrary, as far as I can recall, I said, I think N82 is always better than K850, and still think so, didn't I?
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-03-11 07:19 ] |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
that review is stupid......that guy owns a G800 and brags on it that's all......And all the flash pics are so dark in the review i can take much better pics with my k850 |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
To each his own...the n82 has provides a different grade of pics with more saturation whcih results in a lack of detail...the k850 pics are grainier but packs to the brim with details...i personally havent seen many n82 pics and ths would be unfair on my part to comment...
Each phone has its own drawbacks and its stroger points..we all can live with it..and the differences in the pics are so subtle..if printed,cant be made out by the naked eye.so y all the fuss..
and its been only 4 months since the k850 surfaced..and the n95 has been there for more than a year...the n95 at the beginning dint produce good pics either and had terrible feedback...and peaple who are balbbering tht the k800 produces better pics...please do so with the original camdriver..wen the k850can be modded for..we can then have a true comparison imo.. |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-11 08:31:08, Luci'sPower wrote:
that review is stupid......that guy owns a G800 and brags on it that's all......And all the flash pics are so dark in the review i can take much better pics with my k850
Absolutely agree. Can take much better pics with my K850 as well.
[addsig] |
pidjong
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Posts: 13
PM |
where do you think this photo taken from?
 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-03-10 01:21
