| Author |
Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) |
jwar1976
Joined: Sep 21, 2008
Posts: 7
PM |
On 2008-09-22 04:06:16, naveedaziz83 wrote:
if i am not wrong, higher the iso higher the noise
so y do we need more noise 
Aah I thought that higher ISO meant brighter pictures. My bad  |
|
|
corrupted
Joined: Dec 19, 2007
Posts: 10
PM |
@ naveedaziz83 i hate pictures that get resized, i want to view it in it's original form and view the exif |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-09-22 04:46:21, jwar1976 wrote:
On 2008-09-22 04:06:16, naveedaziz83 wrote:
if i am not wrong, higher the iso higher the noise
so y do we need more noise
Aah I thought that higher ISO meant brighter pictures. My bad
It does mean a brighter picture, but also so much noise that the picture is unusable.
You need a really large sensor for any iso higher than 400 to be really effective (larger sensors have less noise at high iso). Phone cam sensors are simply too small for high iso's to be effective.
|
kamal4techtalk
Joined: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 34
PM |
Ya resizing the pictures makes them pixelated.
Orginal resolution pics have great clarity |
Janbobejan
Joined: Jan 24, 2008
Posts: 35
From: Southern Africa
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-09-22 04:57:18, max_wedge wrote:
On 2008-09-22 04:46:21, jwar1976 wrote:
On 2008-09-22 04:06:16, naveedaziz83 wrote:
if i am not wrong, higher the iso higher the noise
so y do we need more noise
Aah I thought that higher ISO meant brighter pictures. My bad
It does mean a brighter picture, but also so much noise that the picture is unusable.
You need a really large sensor for any iso higher than 400 to be really effective (larger sensors have less noise at high iso). Phone cam sensors are simply too small for high iso's to be effective.
You are saying, - phone cam sensors are simply too small for high iso's to be effective. Hmmm . . . have a look at the INNOV8 bud Is fine with me if you are confussed, but please, don't confuse others !
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-09-22 04:06:16, naveedaziz83 wrote:
if i am not wrong, higher the iso higher the noise
so y do we need more noise
of course you right... people often mix this things wrong. im super-duper glad that SE took this manuell ISO-setiings away on C902. it didnt do any good anyway.
C902 is a good example that automatic ISO works good. its very seldom the pictures uses wrong ISO.
im glad C905 followed C902 example with NO manuell ISO. manuell ISO settings on cell phones suxs. it makes more bad then good 
edit.
the point with manuell ISO (on example K850) was there so you could force the camera to use a higher ISO (even in brighter conditions), the thought was right, but it never became very good in the real world.
manuell ISO works just good on real cameras with bigger lenses & bigger sensors. (there you actually can use a higher ISO and still get normal noise-level)
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-22 08:03 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-22 08:32:38, plankgatan wrote:
im super-duper glad that SE took this manuell ISO-setiings away on C902. it didnt do any good anyway.
Glad to not have the choice? Manual ISO selection is not just to increase the ISO but also to decrease it. If you want to shoot a really good photo with low noise then you would choose an ISO speed of 100 or less. On the C902 this option is not there...
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
manual ISO sucks? not if you know how to use it and what benefits it can bring (yes, it can)
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-22 08:56 ] |
yea g
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
|
does the c905 have no manual iso? I have one acronym:wtf
|
Dart5
Joined: Mar 03, 2005
Posts: 168
PM |
On 2008-09-21 21:20:08, jwar1976 wrote:
. . . I honestly feel that the new LG KC910 which is due next month will be the handset of the year as that has the VGA capture as well as the same flash as the SE C905 & has all the other camera features like face recognition etc etc.
Yea, feel the same way. Unless Nokia pull something out of the hat at the last minute, when my contract runs out next months I won't be getting a replacement SE for the 1st time is years. Otherwsie it will be the KC910. |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
On 2008-09-22 01:13:00, NightBlade wrote:
Here's a pic of the flash menu of the Dusk Setting theme. (in case you meant what I think you meant)
_________________
Make sure you visit the " Post your photoshopped wallpapers here!" thread every week or so for graphically-rich goodies!:D
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-09-22 00:17 ]
Yeah that's what I'm after, thanks. I have seen that picture before though, and was kind of hoping for new pics. But that theme looks sick
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Woooooooooooooooooooooo
got ma C905
Its awesome
pics later
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
a teaser:
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
how does it feel? is the sliding mecanism firm? the display? everythin'!!!!
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Yeee haaaa! Get snapping PK!
How many themes are there?
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-09-22 04:46
jay0726 | 
