| Author |
Number1 2.8 final k790/k800/k810 camdriver |
whitehackker
Joined: Sep 01, 2007
Posts: 154
From: philippines
PM |
@number1.. can you please tell me which lines are responsible for color and contrast???
your answer is much appreciated..
thanks.. and Godbless |
|
|
mario06
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 73
PM |
Here's a closeup shot in macro with all settings in auto on a sunny day using Number1's 2.86 special camdriver, i reverted back to this one because the newer pictures with 2.87 & 2.88 are overexposed again 
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 05:06 ]
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 05:09 ]
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 05:10 ] |
xan K
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Republica Dominicana
PM |
wonderful picture! I agree, I've also found some overexposure too.
|
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
Oh my lord. Never seen a so good picture. are you sure its a k800/810? 
Told you 2.86 is the best. I upgraded to 2.88 because i thought it is better. but shifting back - hope u fix torch on 2.86 number1.
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2007-10-20 10:23 ] |
TheNerd
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 157
PM |
2.88,Exp -0.7, automode.
seems like it has a problem,I mean,when I dont touch the exposure,it usually overexposures,but when I lower it manually,like in this image,it get really dard.
 |
mario06
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 73
PM |
thanks guys, i'm gonna stick with the 2.86s and i want to second the torch bug fix, hope number1 does it 
A special thanks to Number 1 for all of his work and to you guys for testing it all!
Regards
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 11:27 ] |
orionekpl
Joined: Oct 17, 2007
Posts: 2
From: Poland, Piekary Śl.
PM |
What I maybe I someone explain have on the aim the programme torch app? How this to use in the option the camera? Is this only the application to utilization as the torch or this come in useful in the camera?. Thanks |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
so every1's saying 2.86 is fine and 2.88 overexposes r u sure about that cause i havn't changed anything 2 do with exposure. |
mario06
Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 73
PM |
On 2007-10-20 15:11:33, number1 wrote:
so every1's saying 2.86 is fine and 2.88 overexposes r u sure about that cause i havn't changed anything 2 do with exposure.
yes i'm sure, i'm using the first posted 2.86 special camdrivers and after much testing i must state that the 2.87 and 2.88 are overexposed, if you'd please fix the torch on the 2.86s i would appreciate it if not it don't matter because i consider you a very talented person and whatever you do deserves respect.
PS. on macro shots the center is also a bit outa focus on the 2.87 & 88s.
Regards
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 14:53 ] |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
maybe u just added a space, and that changed alll in camdriver dunno. u said u have added more contrast to document mode in 2.87 and fixed torch in 2.88 maybe that was the problem. |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
On 2007-10-20 15:45:45, mario06 wrote:
On 2007-10-20 15:11:33, number1 wrote:
so every1's saying 2.86 is fine and 2.88 overexposes r u sure about that cause i havn't changed anything 2 do with exposure.
yes i'm sure, i'm using the first posted 2.86 special camdrivers and after much testing i must state that the 2.87 and 2.88 are overexposed, if you'd please fix the torch on the 2.86s i would appreciate it if not it don't matter because i consider you a very talented person and whatever you do deserves respect.
PS. on macro shots the center is also a bit outa focus on the 2.87 & 88s.
Regards
[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-10-20 14:53 ]
And also, fix the exif data. Eventhough it's nothing.
Cheers,mate. |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
1. pic with number1 2.88, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.7
2. pic with number1 2.86, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.7
1. pic with number1 2.88, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.0
2. pic with number1 2.86, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.0
|
whitehackker
Joined: Sep 01, 2007
Posts: 154
From: philippines
PM |
On 2007-10-20 17:28:48, milan91 wrote:
1. pic with number1 2.88, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.7
2. pic with number1 2.86, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.7
1. pic with number1 2.88, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.0
2. pic with number1 2.86, landscape, stabilizer, wb daylight, ev +0.0
@milan91
the third pic was ok the daylight WB was applied as seen on it's yellowish color but on the fourth pic i noticed there was something wrong, im sure in the fourth pic u also use the daylight WB but it wasn't applied even though u use diff. version of cam drive it should also show the yellowish color like in all versions of cam drive regardless of who modded it the incandescent WB gives off bluish color...
what im trying to say that it was the bug that im talking about before on camdrive 2.86.. even though u changed the WB the WB you selected was not properly applied... it just gives off an automatic WB...
so the comparison of pic 3 and 4 is not good.. |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
I dont know  I have problem before with 2.86, when i set daylight nothing happen, but when i set again daylight then its good.But today i forget on that bug.
|
whitehackker
Joined: Sep 01, 2007
Posts: 154
From: philippines
PM |
On 2007-10-20 18:23:58, milan91 wrote:
I dont know I have problem before with 2.86, when i set daylight nothing happen, but when i set again daylight then its good.But today i forget on that bug.
2.86 is perfect but with that it cannot assure to take good photos at anytime...
2.87 and 2.88 have also that bug but not as often as the 2.86.... maybe it has something to do with the delay or the update.. something like that....
hope number1 is working on that issue.. |
|
|
Posted: 2007-10-20 04:10
