| Author |
5 megapixel Sony Ericsson K850 Cyber-shot phone announced |
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
On 2007-10-05 17:14:11, AbuBasim wrote:
Three crops taken from the photos at 100 percent scale. Identify which camera/camera phone each came from:
WTF?: 
Getting better, but still not there yet...
That's more like it!
the last one is the k850?! |
|
|
Sobo
Joined: May 28, 2007
Posts: 88
PM |
if you put it in your pocket it will clean itself(almost)  |
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
The first one is N95??? Last is K850!!! |
escaphus03
Joined: Dec 08, 2006
Posts: 14
From: Quisqueya la bella, DOM, REP.
PM, WWW
|
i wanna k850.
how i can buy one
my world is nokia my picture and music is nokia, and your world as is ?
nokia rules.......
|
Bhavv
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@ fullforce, I just read the word whining in your earlier post so assumed you were complaining about the phone and picture quality XD
Sorry I should read first.
Being an  fanboy is just as bad as being an apple fanboy 
[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2007-10-05 23:23 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
AbuBasim,
No 1 is N95
no 2 is K850 (purple fringe)
no 3 is i-mobile 902
Just got myself a i-mobile 902, and its a much better camera than the K850 will ever be. Evidence is in AbuBasim's post.
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually I cropped photos from Phonedaily's K858-N95-P100 "shootout", page 13, third row of photos, and this was the order:
1. N95
2. K858c
3. P100
@soane28,
I agree with you regarding the i-mobile 902. I have the same phone. I was so disappointed that Eldar at MR got it wrong regarding the sensor in the K850i. But at the same understandable. If SE would have used the same sensor in the K850i then it would have been a killer phone, hurting Sony's digicam sales!
Did anyone notice the slightly wider angle of the N95? Plus the fact that it's focal length is also slightly longer than the K850's. I am curious about the size of the sensor in this phone. I would expect the N95 to be capable of much better photos if Nokia could tone down the noise reduction. What this phone is producing now looks more like impressionist art. If Monet were alive today, don't you think he would love the N95?
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
 Monet would love it! Leonardo Da Vinci would hate it
re: i-mobile 902, it has ccd sensor afaik. It's also available in limited markets. For example we never get these phones in Australia. The 902 camera interface is frustrating compared to SE, also the phone software is rather buggy compared to the stable nature of SE non-symbian handsets.
Still it does take a good picture
|
DonJuan
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Las Vegas
PM |
I'm kinda confused on what phone took which picture now. Personally i think the i mobile is really ugly. I like my phone to look cool and i dont think that one does. |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
abusim stated two posts above exactly which is which:
1. N95
2. K858c
3. P100
I agree with you about the looks of the 902, but I never buy a phone for looks unless both the phones I am comparing have identical features and I like both UI's, then I will choose the one that looks better. To me the K850 has better UI than the imobile 902, so my preference would go to the K850 (given that the K850 camera is still good even though it's photos aren't as good as the 902)
(though in fairness I still need to actually test the K850 UI - I'm assuming it will be very similar to existing SE ui)
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks
K800 Tips and Themes
Max's K800 Page
[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2007-10-06 03:21 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
yes the K850 camera UI looks more user-friendly with all the shortcuts and easy access to settings. The I-mobile camera UI is based on SE UI tho, without the shortcuts.
However, the I-mobile 902 has quite a few settings which should be standard in the cyber-shot range eg saturation/sharpness setting, forced flash option, change amount of time for self timer and multi focus option.
Hopefully members here will have their hands on the K850 so we can get a review of the camera and usability soon
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2007-10-06 03:51 ] |
escaphus03
Joined: Dec 08, 2006
Posts: 14
From: Quisqueya la bella, DOM, REP.
PM, WWW
|
I WANNA ONE
my world is nokia my picture and music is nokia, and your world as is ?
nokia rules.......
|
rss_ndrsn
Joined: Aug 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Would be great if SE add the following features:
a. Increase panaroma resolution - VGA to 1 mpx
b. VGA recording @30 fps, QVGA @120 fps
c. 3 more led lights
LG Viety 5 mpx camera takes really good pictures. It is a touchscreen phone, too. |
Bhavv
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-05 19:59:54, plankgatan wrote:
maybe if you have really grease hands, you shouldnt buy k850 ...he he
Or maybe you should use a little soap and water at the sink  |
haki
Joined: May 14, 2002
Posts: 390
From: The real MACEDONIA in GREECE
PM |
Let me sum up some facts regarding the phone's SAR indicator:
1. The phone is practically out.
2. It's a 6-band phone so it must have gone through FCC certification by now.
3. It definitely has gone through European certification.
4. Official SE lips are tightly sealed regarding SAR levels for this particular phone...as if they are extremely hesitant to announce it.
5. Dr. Google seems to be incapable of providing any clues.
6. There was a scant rumor that the SAR is 2.0W/Kg...the upper permissible level.
From the above I conclude that the SAR level of the K850i is something that SE is NOT proud of, that they fear that an early announcement will cut down on sales, and that the SAR level is indeed around 2.0W/Kg!
Do you people agree or am I exaggerating things?
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2007-10-06 09:37 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-10-05 20:08
