Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
zide Joined: Jul 20, 2009 Posts: 481 From: Portugal PM |
On 2009-09-20 17:05:30, Pitzon wrote:
This is the exact situations where we need a xenon flash. My n86 also sucks in these situations. The scenery gets lit up nicely but it uses a long exposure time. People move so they get blurred. With a strong xenon flash the cam uses a shorter exposure time and it works nice.
I think that the lack of a xenon flash in the N86 is hilarious/ridiculous... What tha hell were they thinking when they decide to add a led flash... By the way Pitzon, I've seen that you had both C902 and C901. Does it worth the upgrade, in terms of detail and focus quality? (From C902 to C901 of course)
Well, I visited a quite nice garden today (named Quinta da Regaleira in Sintra, Portugal. I'd recommend it!) and, once again, I was hoping to get impressed by my C902.
90% of battery lasted me for 160 photos, all taken with daylight white balance. I'll post 10 photos which I selected as being the better in sharpness and overall quality:
I think this first one is the most detailed and focused of all:
What do you think? I must admin that I am not impressed at all. Out of 160, I'll remain as "pretty decent" almost 20 photos. The rest I'd say that are commun crappy camera phone photos. I don't doubt that C902 can take impressive photos but that is not an easy task.
I am not a experienced neither skilled person in this photography scene ofc, but camera phones aren't made for those either... So, am I asking too much for this tiny camera-phone sensor?
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-21 01:07 ] |
|
mrjulius Joined: Jun 19, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Pleasant Hills, Manila PM, WWW
|
hehe camera phones has auto focus
 Xperia Arc S,  AinoU10i,  x10m,  c902,  k750i,  |
mrjulius Joined: Jun 19, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Pleasant Hills, Manila PM, WWW
|
If you want to view all original size go here
mrjuliusC902shots

[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-09-21 19:05 ]  Xperia Arc S,  AinoU10i,  x10m,  c902,  k750i,  |
wifiwupding Joined: Sep 07, 2009 Posts: 54 PM |
Heres a fiew pictures I took erlier on my new c902
 |
zide Joined: Jul 20, 2009 Posts: 481 From: Portugal PM |
@ MrJulius & wifiwupding: Are you using the image stabilization?
@ MrJulius: Do you always use the spot metering mode? If yes, why? |
wifiwupding Joined: Sep 07, 2009 Posts: 54 PM |
I am using the image stabilizer yes im allso using the spot metering mode because ive only just found out what it does, i thought it was just a cross to mark the center of the image to make things easier |
zide Joined: Jul 20, 2009 Posts: 481 From: Portugal PM |
Well. I think I found the cause of my photo blurr and lack of sharpness. How can I set the shutter speed in C902?
Still @ MrJulius: Are you using the image stabilization?
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-22 00:37 ] |
mrjulius Joined: Jun 19, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Pleasant Hills, Manila PM, WWW
|
@zide
N0, i d0nt use image stabi.
And yes, i use spot in macro sh0t.
And i also manual the ev.
Also manual the white balance
|
mrjulius Joined: Jun 19, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Pleasant Hills, Manila PM, WWW
|
how to pay in flickr.com
i dont know how hehehe
the pictures will gone in 1 month
 Xperia Arc S,  AinoU10i,  x10m,  c902,  k750i,  |
gayannr Joined: Jun 23, 2008 Posts: 499 From: Sri Lanka PM |
@wifiwupding
Are those all shots are on Auto White Balance and Auto Scene ?
 |
Pitzon Joined: Oct 14, 2007 Posts: 435 From: Sweden PM |
On 2009-09-21 01:51:04, zide wrote:
On 2009-09-20 17:05:30, Pitzon wrote:
This is the exact situations where we need a xenon flash. My n86 also sucks in these situations. The scenery gets lit up nicely but it uses a long exposure time. People move so they get blurred. With a strong xenon flash the cam uses a shorter exposure time and it works nice.
I think that the lack of a xenon flash in the N86 is hilarious/ridiculous... What tha hell were they thinking when they decide to add a led flash... By the way Pitzon, I've seen that you had both C902 and C901. Does it worth the upgrade, in terms of detail and focus quality? (From C902 to C901 of course)
c902 has better build quality but c901 is better on every aspect otherwise i think. Bigger screen, more comfortable keys, xenon flash who works well in "party" situations. I also feel the c901 to be much better cam allround. Mine was dead accurate in most situations. I browse through all pics i have taken sometimes and still gets stunned on how good they look. c902 can also snap bautiful pics in good light but the c901 can do so much more..... After hundreds of pics with them both i can without doubt say that the c901 is the winner
|
zide Joined: Jul 20, 2009 Posts: 481 From: Portugal PM |
Even my girlfriends old 3.2 MP Samsung U600 takes sharper pictures than my C902...
But tell me, how can I deacrease the shutter speed in my C902? |
crossmatched Joined: Jan 05, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: RP PM, WWW
|
months ago, there was a cybershot booth set up by in a mall to promote the CS phones.
they had a live c902 handset for customers and kibitzers to play around and use.
my friend took pics. the booth was well lighted with all the klieg lights etc etc.
when we viewed them full screen on a laptop, there it was! in all its glory and abundance - oil painting effects and softness in images
so sad for a cybershot.. am glad c901 is out already to take over c902
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2009-09-22 16:28 ] www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com we are all works under progress |
mrjulius Joined: Jun 19, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Pleasant Hills, Manila PM, WWW
|

[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-09-23 03:39 ]  Xperia Arc S,  AinoU10i,  x10m,  c902,  k750i,  |
zide Joined: Jul 20, 2009 Posts: 481 From: Portugal PM |
Hello again!
Today I found that the Document Mode (DM) gives a very nice sharpness and contrast to the fotos, therefore it is better that the full-auto (AM) mode in my opinion.
All the following were taken with daylight white-balance, 0,0 EV. Check them out:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
AM:
DM:
DM (with image stablizer):
AM:
Well, sorry for the photo spam! Hope it can be usefull to you.
In this last example, do you prefer with or without the stabllizer?
I must say i'm impressed with the quality of the DM.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-25 19:56 ] |
|