| Author |
Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The c702 has 2x zoom in vga res or video mode, 2x is enough for digital zoom as it degrades the pic quality. |
|
|
Leks
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Auto mode:
|
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
some low light
 |
barret
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 9
PM |
@ jigonx : So dude having tested both k770 and c702 can you tell us in your opinion which takes the best photos? I think i m goin for the c702. What you think about its camera? Is it worth it?
And thanks for all the helpfull photos you ve posted! |
843
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 42
PM |
Outdoor, enhanced with PhotoDJ
Outdoor through window
Indoor, portrait
Indoor, twilight landscape
Indoor, twilight portrait, without flash
Indoor, document, flash
 |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
red flower
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
wow, great colors, jigonx!
[addsig] |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
On 2008-08-05 15:16:48, barret wrote:
@ jigonx : So dude having tested both k770 and c702 can you tell us in your opinion which takes the best photos? I think i m goin for the c702. What you think about its camera? Is it worth it?
And thanks for all the helpfull photos you ve posted!
C702 can take better photos than K770 for Outdoor picture. but K770 totally wins for indoor/low light picture, coz C702 photos when low light is darker and not as sharp as K770 photos.
@ Amras
Thanks bro! 
|
rukna
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
macro
auto
Landscape
auto
|
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
just to keep this thread alive.. 
scene = Landscape
Indoor
Outdoor
|
rukna
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
Purple in Black
macro+Led
 |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Is the C702 camera better than C902 as a few people have said so. |
843
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 42
PM |
They have similar sensors, but the one in C702 is much smaller. In camera phones, too many pixels = noise and aggressive post-processing = lost of details. Since both phones are released in similar time frames, SE decided to give C702 a smaller sensor, otherwise C902 would be overpowered easily, losing sales of that handset.
C702 does suffer in low light by producing a lot of noise, but the shorter focal length allows for better macros (up to 5cm). Correct me if I'm wrong. |
843
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 42
PM |
Full:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13825 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
thinks its quite sad that Sonyericsson DIDNT put in same awesome image-sensor as in k810.
((IMX-018) with other words)
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-16 11:54 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-30 21:43
