Author |
Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5) |
jordyzzz Joined: Jul 21, 2008 Posts: 55 PM |
On 2008-10-24 04:36:24, dedi2004 wrote:
On 2008-10-24 04:02:23, jordyzzz wrote:
set ev position to +1.7, then use zoom button!!!
yess.....it works
thanks.....
no probz, mate!!!
and you'll notice, zoom can't get to max!!! |
|
vudu70 Joined: Apr 15, 2008 Posts: 383 From: Hungary PM, WWW
|
vudu v4.56b3:
full size
Raiderski v6.5.1 FRC2 (m1) macro:
full size
jordyzzz:
Zoom is limited to 4x.
In code:
PHOTO_ZM=$s5 04 -> x16
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.1 FRC2+eXtremeAudioIII->vuduHQ
[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-10-24 12:33 ] |
jordyzzz Joined: Jul 21, 2008 Posts: 55 PM |
what's wrong with that pics??? |
vudu70 Joined: Apr 15, 2008 Posts: 383 From: Hungary PM, WWW
|
Nothing in the world. I only upload these.
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.1 FRC2+eXtremeAudioIII->vuduHQ
[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-10-24 12:27 ] |
iG012 Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 70 PM |
How do I use EM/SEM???? |
hfmls Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 489 PM |
oh god..... please read...
go to position 1.0 and then press zoom twice |
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
autofocus (macro off) test results in no light (total darkness) and with 25W lightbulb. I have compared original AF method and new method implemented since v6.3.3
- more than 100 shots
- quick switch between old and new method to minimize changes in camera position
1. at first I took some sequences of 2 pics (one pic for every method). in most situations results from both methods are identical but there was also wrong results with first or second method. when I write 'wrong' I mean totally failed or focused at wrong distance. it's hard to take serious this comparision - this is the edge of AF accuracy (it is because of low light) and you cannot believe in results which can be almost random
2. I took sequences of 4 pics (two pics for every method). in some situations one pic was good while second pic was wrong for the same method - for 2 identical shots when I didn't moved camera at all! I tried this again and again and result was still the same - good or wrong. answer for random results from previous test appeared immediately: AF algorithm results may vary for exactly the same scene and method
3. I took additional shots to take a closer look at problematic situations
- scene #1: 6 attempts - old method all 6 failed, new method all 6 good
- scene #2: 6 attempts - old method 3 times good, new method 5 times good
I tried to find scene where old method is better than new method - no success but of course I'm not saying that's impossible. my observations are exactly the same like it was in huge test of v6.3.3 before I released it
both methods are good and in some situations both can fail. wrong results are quite normal for poor light conditions and no one should expect miracles. nothing surprized me, I don't see nothing unusual in any method in weak light but to be fair, new method gave considerable more good results in test #3
|
jordyzzz Joined: Jul 21, 2008 Posts: 55 PM |
i use original driver...
autofocus deadlock is always happen, because of dark object and low light, but, keep trying, and you got it!!!
and the details is awesome on my pics!!! |
hfmls Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 489 PM |
yeah...if u like the noise.
EM is the best thing ever in k800i |
mirrage24 Joined: May 07, 2008 Posts: 101 From: Philippines PM |
got to agree with that... Em function is just awesome.. hehe |
iG012 Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 70 PM |
On 2008-10-24 22:15:59, hfmls wrote:
oh god..... please read...
go to position 1.0 and then press zoom twice
where? |
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
jordyzzz
autofocus deadlock have nothing to do with low light and it's completely different and very rare issue which I believe is fixed in RC2
all this autofocus discussion is bullshit. are we talking about your imagination or reality? why would I defend an inferior autofocus method? well, at least we can say that all my tests with hundreds of photos are lying if this will make you happier. you don't like it? don't use it, simple
iG012
to understand this driver you have to read two things:
1. first post of this thread
2. file readme.txt
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-10-25 10:46 ] |
jordyzzz Joined: Jul 21, 2008 Posts: 55 PM |
ok, ok, cool!!!
don't be mad!!!
i'm just giving suggestion!!!
i'll always wait for your newest version!!! |
dragos08 Joined: Sep 15, 2008 Posts: 3 PM |
raider v 6.5

full size image http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/4541/dsc01643fp1.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: dragos08 on 2008-10-26 07:12 ]
[ This Message was edited by: dragos08 on 2008-10-26 07:14 ] |
mirrage24 Joined: May 07, 2008 Posts: 101 From: Philippines PM |
hei MR. vudu70 can tell me what adjustments or settings u did when capturing landscape photos? yours are really great... |
|