| Author |
Post Pictures taken with your Nokia 808 Pureview |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Love the shot of the building in Denver  I hope Nokia come up with a new Pureview whopper at MWC.
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!!
Nokia Lumia 620
AKA,Bonovox[ This Message was edited by: Sean72 on 2013-02-21 10:48 ] |
|
|
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
I don't think that the NT kernel would allow for a 100% port of the Phase 1 system, but I am sure they will have some variation of it at MWC.
Maybe they could use one of those SoCs: http://www.anandtech.com/show[....]t-400-krait-300-snapdragon-800
..but I am still not convinced that they can handle the sensor and the required oversampling, especially in video mode.. 1 billion pixels/sec 
I really don't care, the 808 is an awesome smartphone.. I really don't miss anything, so.. I am good until something that can fully replace it comes along. |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Resolving detail like a boss... thanks Carl Zeiss 
Just look at the grass in the foreground.. the phone was meant for pixel peepers
 |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
Excellent DoF with the shots here, this phone is perfect for macro/portrait imaging, if Nokia would plan to integrate this sensor on their new WP device they need much larger aperture and more manual controls for that and the shutter.
~19 years at Esato |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually I don't think its good for portraits or macro... the sensor is not big enough to really blur the background for proper portrait photography, and on the macro side you can get close enough to the subject.
The 808 shines in landscape photography...
here is some xenon power there are many stand alone cameras that can't pull that kind of clarity and white balance when shooting in the dark..
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-02-26 19:13 ] |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Hey cu015170
Love the photos whats your Parrot called? he/she is cute
An "Apple" a day keeps the Doctor at Bay! |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Thanks! The bird isn't mine...it was a random encounter, but I could tell you the name of the dog.. Oliver
|
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
^^ lol if you encounter the bird again get his name and number then 
An "Apple" a day keeps the Doctor at Bay! |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
 will do!
 |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
That is some seriously pure looking blue sky.
Literally no grain to it. Unbelievable.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-03-02 17:15:51, etaab wrote:
That is some seriously pure looking blue sky.
Literally no grain to it. Unbelievable.
If you look closely you can see the algorithm work... and it misses here and there and you can see some artifacts, but overall, yes.. its amazing considering the size of the whole thing. To get that kind of performance you will need a much bigger machine
Here is another one, its a little better here I think
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-03-02 18:49 ] |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Well there never will be perfect technology, but the 808 comes as close as ive ever seen before.
Not even my N8 can come as close to that and it takes brilliant images.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
rikken
Joined: Feb 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
It's very good image quality, but I believe this quality will be available on more phones as technology advances. Who would have thought a few years ago that we would get such pictures from a cameraphone ?
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Very clean looking images
Phone?? What phone?? |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-03-03 20:08:54, etaab wrote:
Not even my N8 can come as close to that and it takes brilliant images.
The N8 is great.. I still have mine as well.. it has a tad better DR (at times) but other than that, I agree with you, the 808 is better overall.
Rumor has it that the new Lumia will be better than the 808 in every way..  I doubt that improvements will be substantial, if any, but we will see.
On 2013-03-03 21:30:25, rikken wrote:
Who would have thought a few years ago that we would get such pictures from a cameraphone ?
The problem is that phase 1 is surrounded by a ring of 50 patents, most of which are owned by Nokia and some by Toshiba, so the chances of this particular tech trickling down to other OEMs is slim to none. They might try to copy it, but it will be very hard to go around the patents.
Improving image quality (with the current tech) is a tricky business.. it gets exponentially harder, its kind of like Formula 1 You can get within 0.500/second of the leading car, but to get within .100 is much, much harder. So getting to that "perfect pixel" gets very hard the closer you get.
I would say that the 808 system is about 2 seconds a lap quicker at the moment, and even if the rest get to within half a second, it will be extremely difficult to match, and even harder to surpass.
If that happens, it will come from a completely different kind of technology, different kind of image sensor.. or maybe a breakthrough in BSI.. I don't know.
here is a good example of why I think the sensor/optics in the 808 is not perfect for portraits, its not big enough to blur the background properly from a distance, so you kind of get a wanna be effect lol
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-03-04 18:41 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2013-02-21 11:43
