| Author |
Post your pictures/videos taken with your T650 |
michka
Joined: May 17, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Brussels-Belgium
PM |
Calm down, this was only a joke. 
Pedestrian: don't run, my car is faster anyway. |
|
|
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Ok, this is the last comparison i'm going to do.
This is one of the best pictures I could find on Flickr taken by a K850i:
It looks very good, and the colors are quite nice. If you look at the exif data, this photo was taken under ISO 64, which is one of the lowest noise profiles you are going to get with this phone.
However, if you go ahead and look at the full sized 5mp image instead of a small 1024x768 reduced version, you actually get to see what it looks like:
This is what the picture actually looks like. And keep in mind that this is some of the best, lowest noise photography the K850 can take. I've seen much, much worse.
Now compare to the T650:
100% view crop:
I don't think I need to say anything further.
And here are links to the full sized versions, so you can look at all of your exif data incase you don't believe me.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2253/2366536057_83e1c09118_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3167/2363261839_a6e7b57939_o.jpg |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
Radiux
awsome shots mate!
OnePlus 8 |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-28 01:37:37, Radiux399 wrote:
Ok, this is the last comparison i'm going to do.
This is one of the best pictures I could find on Flickr taken by a K850i:
It looks very good, and the colors are quite nice. If you look at the exif data, this photo was taken under ISO 64, which is one of the lowest noise profiles you are going to get with this phone.
However, if you go ahead and look at the full sized 5mp image instead of a small 1024x768 reduced version, you actually get to see what it looks like:
This is what the picture actually looks like. And keep in mind that this is some of the best, lowest noise photography the K850 can take. I've seen much, much worse.
I agree, yes, that pic is awful in details.
Though I don't think that's the best what K850 can do.  Coz actually, I've taken many pics with better details with my K850 in ISO-64 or 80.
Cropped 100% in the small areas:
you can still see some plate numbers on this one:
See I'm still NOT a huge fan of K850 (and K800/K810)'s post processing (esp what it does to the edges of the objects -> artifacts). But I just can't stay still if you say tha the flickr pic was some of the best K850 can take. Coz these ones I posted simply have better details than 'the best one' you found at flickr coz at least, they aren't blurry (the one from flickr is so blurry). You can see the differences between my pics and that flickr pic at the first sight, don't you?
BTW, please keep in mind that I'm not a T650 hater. From the beginning, I always agree, that it takes pics with details and still so. I just want to str8 things up about what K850 can do.
the full-res 5MP pics:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10215
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10334
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10565
[addsig] |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
BTW, I think this plankgatan's pic even has better details than that K850 flickr pic
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10248
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10268
Credits to plankgatan.
[addsig] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
im actually surprised by some T650 pics, special this Cafe pic...very good indeed. BUT its very seldom you see that quality by T650 
once again, K850 win BIG on details, low light pics, etc
(this is no new pic, but it really shows the details)
http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/4941/2008012422262370vjfx4.jpg
ps... Radiuxs.... do you really mean that this was the BEST K850 you could find ????? he he he (i think its really mediocre)
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-03-28 09:58 ] |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
@plankgatan:
What are you doing here?! |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
???
what are YOU doing here ????
(im not have some T650 pics to show, DO YOU ?? )
do you want to know my purpose in this thread ???? (im still curious of the pics on page 7... .. nothing more, nothing less)
|
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-03-28 11:00:53, plankgatan wrote:
???
what are YOU doing here ????
(im not have some T650 pics to show, DO YOU ?? )
do you want to know my purpose in this thread ???? (im still curious of the pics on page 7... .. nothing more, nothing less)
By showing K850 pics?!! |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
what is wrong with pics on page 7 ?
|
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-28 01:16:34, Radiux399 wrote:
I'm not out to convince him. I don't really care what his opinion is. But I do want to show others that the T650/K770 really does have an awesome camera, sometimes even better than what the K850 offers, at a much cheaper price!
whatttt????' t650 camera better than k850, are you joking right?
i admit t650 camera is very good, i see so much picture posted here but no better than k850.
and about the flickr picture. I think you didnt search too much, did dyou? because there are a lot of better pictures than that
and you cant compare 2 different pictures.
[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2008-03-28 16:13 ] |
jack00
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
some experimental shots (different settings)
edited with photoshop
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-28 17:10:32, coquito wrote:
On 2008-03-28 01:16:34, Radiux399 wrote:
I'm not out to convince him. I don't really care what his opinion is. But I do want to show others that the T650/K770 really does have an awesome camera, sometimes even better than what the K850 offers, at a much cheaper price!
whatttt????' t650 camera better than k850, are you joking right?
i admit t650 camera is very good, i see so much picture posted here but no better than k850.
[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2008-03-28 16:13 ]
I think T650 is surely better than K850 in low light without flash pics.
Anyway.. this is my first pic taken with my T650. Love the filename dsc00001. 
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10783
[addsig] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
what a quality at 100% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
simply great
OnePlus 8 |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Amras, you picked up a T650? What happened to your K770?
And the quality of that pic is just amazing! I think its actually better (sharper) than what my T650 can do!
[ This Message was edited by: Radiux399 on 2008-03-28 21:32 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-03-28 01:25
