| Author |
SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition |
XperiaCute
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Posts: 298
PM |
#- Sony Xperia Z1 Benchmark ..
Antutu ..
Quadrant
> 
[ This Message was edited by: XperiaCute on 2013-09-05 20:31 ] |
|
|
ArsenalFan
Joined: Apr 26, 2013
Posts: 47
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:30:58, XperiaCute wrote:
#- Sony Xperia Z1 Benchmark ..
Antutu ..
Quadrant
>
[ This Message was edited by: XperiaCute on 2013-09-05 20:31 ]
then why GSMArena reported 29000 for AnTuTu?
like.no.other |
yeyeoye
Joined: Sep 05, 2013
Posts: 6
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:23:04, ArsenalFan wrote:
is USB 3.0 available in Z1?
snap 800 support USB 3.0. right?
No USB 3.0 in phones because current eMMC's are to slow to work with high speeds found in USB 3.0 |
maiaramdan
Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Posts: 308
From: Kazan living in Sumy
PM |
On 2013-09-05 20:56:23, kewsvnet wrote:
love what Sony have done with their announcement at IFA!
Great Phone (check) - Honami (probably one of the best smartphones out there)
Great Range of accessories to go with it (check)
Great media services and cloud integration (check)
Sony have just established themselves as the 'Apple' of Android with all that! and that using more open and standard based technologies!!!
Kaz was right not to sell the Sony Entertainment...I like how they are integrating everything ONE SONY!!!!
Now that Honami is out
what are the realistic expectations of Honami mini?
Is it realistic to expect it to be pretty much Honami with these differences:
4.3" 720p screen
2400mAh battery
smaller body obviously
or do we expect any other downgrades (I really hope not)
[ This Message was edited by: kewsvnet on 2013-09-05 19:59 ]
720p 4.3" screen, with the same processor , with the z sized battery and Less camera pixel
Maybe the same camera of Z1 but not 20 mp
Maybe 16 or 13 |
krapster
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Posts: 14
PM |
Anything new on the Xperia Z2? I've been away for a while and last time I saw randomuser's rumor specs. Looking good to me.
Thanks. |
MNX1024
Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Posts: 413
PM |
@maiaramdan Won't that mean the Honami Mini(should we call it Z1 Mini now?) outperform the Z1 in every aspect? |
Away
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-09-05 18:03:26, Tsepz_GP wrote:
IF that is really true, then you're suggesting that Samsung went for the very best SoC that they could get from Qualcomm at the moment for their flagship, that's a very good thing, and it puts a lot of things I've been wondering about the S800 perfectly into perspective. 
Why don't you go stare at a digital clock? It seems like you have quite the hobby in watching numbers insignificantly rise.
The s800 is atrociously powerful 2.2gHz. Good luck seeing differences between the 2.2gHz one and the 2.3gHz.
Oh wait... BATTERY!
You will see a difference there. There, and in benchmarks.
Benchmarks?
On 4.2, the Z1 rivals the 'better' processor of the g2 and n3, the latter which is on 4.3. Once the 4.3 comes out for the z1, it should best the current scores for the n3. In other words, Sony being a new Sony (there's more than one company dreaming about having kaz as CEO out there) have made the most out of the battery and optimised what they have better than others. But unlike 2012, in terms of hardware, they're on par with or better than the competition.
And nice to have maia back. |
-XYZ
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
Posts: > 500
PM |
Still annoyed that Sony hasn't put the best screen in the Z1. Yeah its got the Triluminos backlighting technology, but the actual LCD panel on top of it, doesn't appear to be as good as the LG G2, the HTC One or other competitors. Off-angle the colours shift noticably, and its retarded that Sony can equip their Vaios with stunning displays with perfect viewing angles, but not so with their flagship Smartphone. Its better than the Z, but that's not really particularly difficult. Its still worse than the competition.
Though I am massively tempted to get one, I'm going to hold off until I've had a look at one in person.
If not I might end up waiting for the 2014 flagship circa MWC 2014. |
Ambivalent_
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Croatia, Zagreb
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:46:11, Away wrote:
Why don't you go stare at a digital clock? It seems like you have quite the hobby in watching numbers insignificantly rise.
Hey man, why are you like that!? Jin dig up some interesting information on SoC differences that we wouldn't know otherwise. He only presented the facts and he didn't deserve your reaction. Chill off.
And nice to have maia back.
Agree.  |
my ninja
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:36:19, yeyeoye wrote:
On 2013-09-05 21:23:04, ArsenalFan wrote:
is USB 3.0 available in Z1?
snap 800 support USB 3.0. right?
No USB 3.0 in phones because current eMMC's are to slow to work with high speeds found in USB 3.0
the Note 3 has USB 3.0 support. eMMC is easily fast enough,and has been for years. |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:36:19, yeyeoye wrote:
On 2013-09-05 21:23:04, ArsenalFan wrote:
is USB 3.0 available in Z1?
snap 800 support USB 3.0. right?
No USB 3.0 in phones because current eMMC's are to slow to work with high speeds found in USB 3.0
Note 3 is the 1st phone with USB 3.0
http://www.sammobile.com/2013[....]faster-transfers-and-charging/
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
XperiaCute
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Posts: 298
PM |
interesting review : http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sony-xperia-z1-fl.shtml
use Google chrome for translation ..
>
[ This Message was edited by: XperiaCute on 2013-09-05 21:29 ] |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
^^ That same review has already been posted at least 3 times |
Jubei1
Joined: Feb 19, 2013
Posts: 99
PM |
On 2013-09-05 21:46:11, Away wrote:
On 2013-09-05 18:03:26, Tsepz_GP wrote:
IF that is really true, then you're suggesting that Samsung went for the very best SoC that they could get from Qualcomm at the moment for their flagship, that's a very good thing, and it puts a lot of things I've been wondering about the S800 perfectly into perspective.
Why don't you go stare at a digital clock? It seems like you have quite the hobby in watching numbers insignificantly rise.
The s800 is atrociously powerful 2.2gHz. Good luck seeing differences between the 2.2gHz one and the 2.3gHz.
Oh wait... BATTERY!
You will see a difference there. There, and in benchmarks.
Benchmarks?
Yeah except it doesnt work like that. The 2.2 (2.15 really) GHz chip runs on higher voltage than the 2.3 Ghz chip.
|
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
I like the white Z1.
I'm surprised people are looking at Mobile-Review's review, thought Nokia and Sony fans hated Eldar Murtazin.
EDIT:
Jubei
So the 2.2GHz S800 used by Sony is eating more power, is that why the Z Ultra had such a disappointing battery score at GSMArena? It got 52hours if I'm not mistaken, quite low for a 2013 flagship as compared to S4 and even Note2.
[ This Message was edited by: Tsepz_GP on 2013-09-05 21:47 ] Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
|
|
Posted: 2013-09-05 21:30
