Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i

Previous  123 ... 117118119 ... 229230231  Next
Author Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i
burner8
K800 Silver
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
Posts: 127
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 12:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@gprsman: 1/10 is to long. If you shoot pics with persons then it is difficult to get sharp pics. Say better "increase colour" as "life colours tm". @ the others: may be that lifecolours dont work in k800 but com 58 works and give better colour. I took 3000 pics and see the difference clearly.
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 12:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i made test here is the standard k800i driver 2.5 no mods done
http://www.4shared.com/file/30046017/88e1d868/camdriver0.html
here is 2.5 with only changes made to the compression which will give better colours.
http://www.4shared.com/dir/4676156/3c965506/test.html

i don't have time to test but maybe some1 else does
gprsman
K810 Blue
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 13:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Ok if does not live color can tell you that colors are real, you see pictures of the day building opposite is true then white color, palaces right not tend to yellow, the color has improved but real because compression is 95%?
gprsman
K810 Blue
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 13:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-11-22 12:37:33, burner8 wrote:
@gprsman: 1/10 is to long. If you shoot pics with persons then it is difficult to get sharp pics. Say better "increase colour" as "life colours tm". @ the others: may be that lifecolours dont work in k800 but com 58 works and give better colour. I took 3000 pics and see the difference clearly.


hello burner8

1 / 10 in Xenon Flash initialization before was 1 / 30, not property 23 that I left at 1 / 30. I tested 1 /10 in property 23 but picture yellow and bad focus.
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-11-22 13:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
gprsman
you can always try to compare reg 58 with two values: 00 and 1D. if you'll achieve result like below then you can say that colors saturation in K800 is working. in my opinion saturation is (must be) but not in reg 58 (some of you tryed this already). maybe you'll find proper reg


G-Izzat
K810 Blue
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 14:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If only we can find which one that can make the colours more saturated, that'd be really great.
gprsman
K810 Blue
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 14:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Raiderski

These photos are flash or without? Real color photos in the first or the second? I will test with your advice. Here in a photo macro with 2.1 fixes 04 live colors:

http://img517.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00051fw4.jpg

I bought a w810 then begin on modding for 2 mpx
Guto_ViP
T200
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-11-22 14:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-11-22 14:20:34, gprsman wrote:
Raiderski

These photos are flash or without? Real color photos in the first or the second? I will test with your advice. Here in a photo macro with 2.1 fixes 04 live colors:

http://img517.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00051fw4.jpg

I bought a w810 then begin on modding for 2 mpx


Nice flower! What is it name? I never see one here on Brazil.
Love or hate me...

Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v30.0.019 -> What is the next??.
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-11-22 16:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
gprsman
first photo of course
burner8
K800 Silver
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
Posts: 127
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 17:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hi gprsman: your new camdriver is just a copy of my driver. You ve copied the whole driver. The only difference is the 1/10 @ the initialization but this caused no changes. It is not the fine kind. My driver based on your driver. I respect this and tell it here. But you copy all my changed settings and call it your new driver. It is not nice.


[ This Message was edited by: burner8 on 2007-11-22 16:35 ]
gprsman
K810 Blue
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 17:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-11-22 17:09:19, burner8 wrote:
Hi gprsman: your new camdriver is just a copy of my driver. You ve copied the whole driver. The only difference is the 1/10 @ the initialization but this caused no changes. It is not the fine kind. My driver based on your driver. I respect this and tell it here. But you copy it and call it your new driver. It is not nice




What if you had to copy my driver on the basis of number 2.89 fixes? You have changed the contrast from 01 to 00 and you put the Flash genus, you see very little.

I put in my camdriver 2.2, shutter speed 1 / 10 and sharpness 02 and contrast to 00, I had to ask permission to you? Not understand!

Write changes between my 2.1 fix mine and what you copied from camdriver of genus and we see this difference.
burner8
K800 Silver
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
Posts: 127
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 17:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Ok you decease sharpenes a little bit. I changed completly the settings in property23 which caused the flash quality. And the contrast and night settings in property. Now you have the same fixes. But let us work together and not against eachother. Sorry for my hard words. I have to thank you because without your work before i couldn t get a so wonderful driver. Sorry man ok
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 18:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-11-22 13:52:26, Raiderski wrote:
gprsman
you can always try to compare reg 58 with two values: 00 and 1D. if you'll achieve result like below then you can say that colors saturation in K800 is working. in my opinion saturation is (must be) but not in reg 58 (some of you tryed this already). maybe you'll find proper reg






colour saturation just work on the k800i, #COM_EVENT(58,10) thats how it works on the k550i, the k800i driver is difficult and a pain in the arse no1 even knows the command for the shutter speed which is quite important
gprsman
K810 Blue
Joined: Aug 28, 2006
Posts: 269
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 19:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-11-22 17:49:50, burner8 wrote:
Ok you decease sharpenes a little bit. I changed completly the settings in property23 which caused the flash quality. And the contrast and night settings in property. Now you have the same fixes. But let us work together and not against eachother. Sorry for my hard words. I have to thank you because without your work before i couldn t get a so wonderful driver. Sorry man ok


Ok no good to refresh your problem is, in fact, try to work together to make a super camdriver with the help of number1 and other modder with experience as Raiderski etc. etc
burner8
K800 Silver
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
Posts: 127
PM
Posted: 2007-11-22 20:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My full RESPECT goes surely to Raiderski and Number1, genus, gprsman and kop.
You all made the k800 to a really good cam.
I'm only a little fish.

Sorry for all i had hurt.

Keep On man, together we are strong.

[ This Message was edited by: burner8 on 2007-11-22 19:35 ]

[ This Message was edited by: burner8 on 2007-11-22 19:37 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 117118119 ... 229230231  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic