| Author |
Withan™ Camera Driver V3/S3 Rev.1 for SE k790/k800/k810 phones |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 18:24:09, bryanjay420 wrote:
can you compare these pics...what can you say...both in extreme darkness flash fired...
ultimate 2.60 withan [auto+macro mode]
number1 2.99.5 se [document mode]
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan) |
|
|
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan)
but is it correct that the modes are correct??like auto+ macro in ultimate and document on number1...coz as far as i can remember some told that never use document mode in ultimate only use it for text...
|no  phone to mod| |i my k800| |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 18:56:26, bryanjay420 wrote:
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan)
but is it correct that the modes are correct??like auto+ macro in ultimate and document on number1...coz as far as i can remember some told that never use document mode in ultimate only use it for text...
The only difference between Auto+macro and document is that document has more contrast and exposure (a little). You can use it too, It depends on the object. |
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
but if you can see properties are almost the same exept for the exposure time....number1 is 1/40sec and ultimate 1/30sec other than that are the same...maybe its the white balance...but do you agree that with this 2 pics number1 has gain more color coz ultimate use tungsten as default wb?
|no phone to mod| |i my k800| |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 19:06:19, bryanjay420 wrote:
but if you can see properties are almost the same exept for the exposure time....number1 is 1/40sec and ultimate 1/30sec other than that are the same...maybe its the white balance...but do you agree that with this 2 pics number1 has gain more color coz ultimate use tungsten as default wb?
Yes it could be the wb, or the wb and the colourgain. I don't know what is tha colourgain in n1 driver. You used flash RER that's why you got 1/30. If you were used Auto + macro it should be 1/6400 |
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
ok...tnx for explaining...
|no phone to mod| |i my k800| |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
why does portrait and twilight portrait have full range AF (macro included)??
And this 2.6 is more flexible, but i loved this part in 2.46:
when i was in a mid to 70% lighted room, i used auto+flash and it took really nice pictures, that means the flash made it a little more bright, giving it perfect light condition (in normal driver flash wouldn't fire in this condition - enough light). Now with 2.6 i can't take pictures like that anymore, only with RER, but since it's not forced, it won't fire :/ what was the difference between 2.46 auto+FF and 2.6 FF ?? ISO, exposure?
example: go into a dark room, take a pictre with auto+FF... 2.46 made the whole room look great and no dark parts, now with 2.6 the back wall of the room is in mid darkness, only close objects are iluminated by the flash. hope u understand :/
Also whats the use of this new auto+flash in daylight stuff? it's night here, so i can't test it. anyone care to explain and give samples too? |
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
.....
[ This Message was edited by: bryanjay420 on 2008-04-09 18:26 ] |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 19:24:19, norbi_nw wrote:
why does portrait and twilight portrait have full range AF (macro included)??
And this 2.6 is more flexible, but i loved this part in 2.46:
when i was in a mid to 70% lighted room, i used auto+flash and it took really nice pictures, that means the flash made it a little more bright, giving it perfect light condition (in normal driver flash wouldn't fire in this condition - enough light). Now with 2.6 i can't take pictures like that anymore, only with RER, but since it's not forced, it won't fire :/ what was the difference between 2.46 auto+FF and 2.6 FF ?? ISO, exposure?
example: go into a dark room, take a pictre with auto+FF... 2.46 made the whole room look great and no dark parts, now with 2.6 the back wall of the room is in mid darkness, only close objects are iluminated by the flash. hope u understand :/
Also whats the use of this new auto+flash in daylight stuff? it's night here, so i can't test it. anyone care to explain and give samples too?
1) For the '70% room' case (lol), you can use the Indoor special mode
2) Yes ISO is lower in 2.6 Auto, you should use Party mode I or II in a total dark room. Read first post info or the Readme |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
kk i got it, but why does the 2 portraits have full range focus? i mean u can enable macro in auto, and go to portrait and have macro.. this way it focuses slow :/ sometimes it takes long to focus and it even causes focal error. so we can enable it any time, but this way we are stuck with it. anyway i found a use for the auto+FF  (i think). |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 19:46:53, norbi_nw wrote:
kk i got it, but why does the 2 portraits have full range focus? i mean u can enable macro in auto, and go to portrait and have macro.. this way it focuses slow :/ sometimes it takes long to focus and it even causes focal error. so we can enable it any time, but this way we are stuck with it. anyway i found a use for the auto+FF (i think).
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility. And the daylight flash special modes have several uses, read some about photography techniques
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-09 18:51 ] |
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility
but its very hard to take pictures on near object without macro mode in auto...
|no phone to mod| |i my k800| |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 19:52:35, bryanjay420 wrote:
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility
but its very hard to take pictures on near object without macro mode in auto...
Is exactly the same difficult as in Auto+macro ... The same command is enabled in the driver.
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-09 18:55 ] |
bryanjay420
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Posts: 273
From: Pinas
PM |
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
its not that i find any lack both in your camdrivers...i both respect you as a modder...i dont want to have favoritism or what...im just trying new drivers that coming out...i dont know about camera modding etc but i can see that both your camdrivers are great...hands down with respect to both of you guys...
|no phone to mod| |i my k800| |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-04-09 20:03:05, bryanjay420 wrote:
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
its not that i find any lack both in your camdrivers...i both respect you as a modder...i dont want to have favoritism or what...im just trying new drivers that coming out...i dont know about camera modding etc but i can see that both your camdrivers are great...hands down with respect to both of you guys...
I only wanted to know if you found any lack that I can improve that's all |
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-09 18:52
phone to mod| |i 
