| Author |
K700 / K500 Firmware Overview |
marlonxp
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere
PM, WWW
|
I want the k500 jbenchmark results
wap.marlonhall.com |
|
|
StoneRoses
Joined: Mar 05, 2002
Posts: 103
From: Thailand
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-09 13:40:01, RedDwarf2002 wrote:
I think one of the ways SE can increase the battery life is to switch the display-light off on a long call. I'm sometimes on a call for over 2 hours and the backlight never goes off - it's just dimmed. Would it not be more sensible to switch the backlight off after about 1 min and if you want to turn the backlight on again just move the joystick or something?
|
|
Totally agree, backlight on while talking give user very little benefit but drain the batt a lot.
SE should give us new setting item on Display tab called "In-call Backlight" or something similar with options "Always On, and 1 to 15 minutes delay". |
mwarner
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Warwickshire, England
PM, WWW
|
@marlonxp
If you have a K500 and wish to benchmark yourself, you can download a copy of JBenchmark 1 and 2 from the website below:
http://www.jbenchmark.com/
or ...
(WAP) wap.jbenchmark.com.
Mike |
marlonxp
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere
PM, WWW
|
I don't have a k500 so could someone benchmark it and give me the results.
wap.marlonhall.com |
vee
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 435
From: Zagreb, HR
PM |
Hello
K700i R2AA003
Jbenchmark2: 129
Image manipulation: 159
Text: 305
Sprites: 180
3D Transform: 211
User interface: 19
Nothing specialy different in software from R2L... SEARCH function is new, it is nice actually altough is quazi seach... I would say for this software: a lot of small bug fixes 
Velimir |
mwarner
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Warwickshire, England
PM, WWW
|
@marlonxp
Just go to the JBenchmark web site and you can look at the benchmark results for all phones there - including the K500. It's not really too different from the K700, as expected.
@vee
Thanks for that. Any chance of JBenchmark 1 scores?
Edit:
Added the JBenchmark 2 scores to the first post
[ This Message was edited by: mwarner on 2004-10-15 10:25 ] |
vee
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 435
From: Zagreb, HR
PM |
K700i R2AA
JBenchmark1 - 2529
JBenchmark2 - 129
Hope this helps
Velimir |
j4sp33d
Joined: Aug 06, 2004
Posts: 70
From: Philippines
PM |
vee:
hi. what are the small bug fixes that you noticed in R2AA? can you list some of the small bug fixes that you have discovered while using R2AA? thanks. btw is it worth upgrading from R2L or should i wait for an R3 or something? |
vee
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 435
From: Zagreb, HR
PM |
I replayed already in the other thread... but no I didn't find anything worth upgrade from R2L to R2AA... Search Phonebook is nice but nothing worth update...
Velimir |
j4sp33d
Joined: Aug 06, 2004
Posts: 70
From: Philippines
PM |
thanks vee. i think i'll just wait for a major update like what R2L did to R2A and R2E. |
vegetaleb
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM |
yes I am waiting for R3x ,r2l is working fine for me |
mwarner
Joined: Dec 23, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Warwickshire, England
PM, WWW
|
@vee
Thanks. I've added them to the first post. |
maxf
Joined: Sep 17, 2004
Posts: 39
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM, WWW
|
I just got my dss-25 and went from r2a to r2l. I don't know if this has already been discussed (I made a quick search) but the picture quality of photos taken with my k700i has improved a great deal. They used to be almost unusable (I was very disappointed with the camera function) and now they are very sharp. Has anyone else experienced this?
http://www.tjitjing.com/sync |
maxf
Joined: Sep 17, 2004
Posts: 39
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM, WWW
|
Oh yeah, I forgot:
Quote:
|
LCD: 200404231
Camera: 3.9
ITP: CXC 125 813 R1T
|
|
1) Can anybody explain what the software for LCD and ITP is?
2) For R2C001 it is stated "Ability to mute the shutter sound of the camera". Is this correct, this doesn't seem to be true for R2L?
http://www.tjitjing.com/sync |
vee
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 435
From: Zagreb, HR
PM |
it seems that picture quality got better from R2A to R2L and someone reporting even from R2L to R2AA... I myself didn't notice that much difference, maybe a bit faster...
But it would be normal that the picture (software diagrams) are getting better from software to software
Velimir
PS. 100 |
|
|
Posted: 2004-10-11 20:51
