| Author |
Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
whatever...just look at the pics, (they are NOT similar to k800/k810).
c702 camera is OK, but not in same league like k800/k810.
its no point to start some debate about this mather... c702 is overall a very nice phone, and hopefully new cam driver will improve pic-quality...(you cant get everything you know)
edit.....c702 have a Samsung module yes ??? (like k770 and c902)
in some way i prefer Sonys cam modules. Samsung in other way produce often quite thick colors, but less details & sharpness.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 11:35 ] |
|
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
c702 pics look better than any smear my k800 produced, i'm not going to pay to much attention to what you say as you like to praise the quality & sharpness of resized pictures.
edit: c702 has a sony cammodule a sony MCB850 cammodule to be exact.
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-13 11:35 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
im not bother anymore... if you want to beleive that c702 take beter pictures then k800/k810, you do that. (have a fun day in your world)
|
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
@plank, look a few pages back in this thread for number1's comparison shots. The C702 looks better than the K800i in almost all his shots.
I don't know why we have to have these stupid arguments anyway. They are just phone cameras and phone cameras generally aren't that great.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
There only phones with cameras but some camera phones camera's are better than others. |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
No point arguing or getting nasty though. It doesn't help anyone. Your opinion is your opinion, not anybody else's.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he he... ok ok..you mean this pics ????
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00001.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00027.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00002-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00025.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00001-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00023.jpg
i cant say what is what on this pics....
but the pics ive seen in different threads...there is k800/k810 better...period
i will not say more about this mather...you guys have a nice & sunny day 
------------------------------------------------------------
why i asked about the cam module is because some pages say different things.
example this page say c902 use a Sony MCB971
http://semcblog.wordpress.com/other/cameras/
and mobile review say it use a Samsung (U900) module
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-c902-en.shtml#7
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 12:03 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 12:05 ] |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
Well that's the C902. That doesn't mean any info on C702 is wrong as well. It has nothing to do with the C702 in fact. Its more than likely that it is actually correct that it has the Sony unit if there is no evidence otherwise.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
macro + flash
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
C702's flash is great for macros no chance of it bleaching & burning the pics. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
nice close up pics... only bad thing with LED flashes is when its require a distance over ~50cm.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-13 17:22 ] |
serhio
Joined: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 4
PM |
all auto with flash
 |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
On 2008-07-13 18:14:00, plankgatan wrote:
only bad thing with LED flashes is when its require a distance over ~50cm.
not a bad thing imo,
thats why we call it LED, coz it's main purpose is for macro shot, close up and of course.. flashlight  |
gstblack
Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 7
PM |
On 2008-07-09 13:15:46, number1 wrote:
The pictures look fine to me what do you think's wrong with them???.
the photos are too dark,not in the macro with the flash..those in twilight mode..
 |
gstblack
Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 7
PM |
i don't think that c702 and k800 have the same picture quality at the twilinght pictures...i'm i wrong??
 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-13 12:20
