Author |
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 discussion |
WhyBe Joined: Apr 02, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Ohio, USA PM |
I think I would prefer the data streaming method. I don't want to go back to cell phones with antennas sticking out of the top, nor do I want to watch commercials. Free air TV is prone to bad reception. |
|
max_wedge Joined: Aug 29, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Australia PM, WWW
|
I think the data streaming method will always be available, even if free to air mobile broadcasts become common
|
brorzan Joined: Jun 03, 2003 Posts: 114 From: PM, WWW
|
I got to play with the X1 today. It was a working example, but it was just an ordinary Windows Mobile version inside. I guess they are still working pretty hard to get all the Sony Ericsson software in it.
The build quality was really good. It felt a lot smaller in the hand then it looks in all the pictures. The keyboard was easy to use, and I was told it will have צהו for the swedish market.
I think this will be the replacement after my P1i, but I will have to try a full working version to be sure.
 |
i-am-andrew Joined: May 10, 2006 Posts: 42 From: UK PM |
I've got a question if someone who's used the X1 can answer please, apologies if it's already been asked/answered - I read the first 15 pages and the last 3 and decided just to ask:
Can you open the the phone and then sit it on the desk and type on it or is the screen part heavy enough to make it topple backwards?
|
karlosperu Joined: Nov 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Los Olivos - Lima - Peru PM |
wuaoooo
http://www.bengalboy.com/modu[....]m=8&post_id=6588#forumpost6588
VIDEO RECORD X1 en vga 640x480 de resolucion.
http://video.google.com/video[....]cid=-4967213615327634717&hl=en
MOUSE OPTICO
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=147188614586516623&hl=en
Pics from XPERIA X1
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: giancito on 2008-04-28 21:53 ] |
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
WOW are those seriously taken from a phone??
|
karlosperu Joined: Nov 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Los Olivos - Lima - Peru PM |
according to the Web seems that if you are.
These photos are very acceptable
[addsig] |
bavlondon2 Joined: Jan 28, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM |
Video link is dead can you repost?
The last pic looks decent but the 1st 2 have a layer of green over it. Doesnt it?
|
karlosperu Joined: Nov 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Los Olivos - Lima - Peru PM |
video
http://video.google.com/video[....]cid=-4967213615327634717&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=147188614586516623&hl=en
_________________

[ This Message was edited by: giancito on 2008-04-28 21:58 ] |
G-Izzat Joined: Nov 15, 2006 Posts: 482 From: MY PM |
I'm actually quite impressed with the pictures taken using the X1. |
karlosperu Joined: Nov 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Los Olivos - Lima - Peru PM |
Certainly the photos are very good, and if they also have a yellowish tone but generally good quality
_________________

[ This Message was edited by: giancito on 2008-04-29 00:39 ] |
metcard Joined: Mar 21, 2006 Posts: 5 PM |
On 2008-04-28 13:39:02, brorzan wrote:
I hope the final version of the black X1 is 100% black including the keyboard area.
Regardless, it's a damn sexy phone. |
aksd Joined: Nov 11, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: UK, India PM, WWW
|
Actually speaking those pics are crap from a technical point of view. Theres hardly any detailing in those pics, the processing basically has first over sharpened the image and then used heavy noise removal resulting in a sharp but pasty image. If you look at the background leaves you can se absolutely no detail on them, due to the over processing the image hasa sort of un real feel. |
WhyBe Joined: Apr 02, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Ohio, USA PM |
Why not get a real camera if you're going to analyze pictures so closely?
There are many things that go into making a camera or picture great, a cell phone simply isn't going to fit all of those technologies into such a small form-factor.
Many flaws in pictures are attributable to the photographer and conditions, not the camera itself.
[ This Message was edited by: WhyBe on 2008-04-29 04:57 ] |
@ftyk Joined: Apr 20, 2008 Posts: 139 PM |
@max_wedge,
yes newer ideally should mean better but i guess this term has lost it's meaning for mobile manufacturers.
the 9500/9300 were far more better phones than the toy that nokia made & named it e90.
i had my p910i for over 2 years but got rid of my p990i in 6 months.
i guess newer now means not better, but buggier.
[addsig] |
|