| Author |
SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition |
unknownC151A
Joined: Oct 15, 2012
Posts: 459
PM |
On 2013-08-17 22:49:16, krapster wrote:
On 2013-08-17 20:32:13, josephnero wrote:
plz ignore the troll everyone.anyone repling trolls is more stupid than them
if you are referring to the post above you you need to stop call him a troll since he is just expressing his opinions, Honestly in my opinion these shots looks not so good for the info we have gotten so far. But these pics don't mean a thing unless we can actually confirm they come from a release Honami and that they are untouched which they aren't.
He's definitely allowed to express his sentiments. But the way he did it - unnecessary mocking of us - really makes him an idiot.
On topic:
In theory, the party photos should give the best quality.
[ This Message was edited by: unknownC151A on 2013-08-18 01:56 ] |
|
|
reeflotz
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM |
I have a feeling that the honami used is the prototype with a casing on the back, and that casing on the back causes the LED flash to reflect toward the camera and produce that blue tint on the side.
To be honest I am quite impressed with the lowlight, I mean if the exif data is right, most of those shots are at ISO 1000 and ISO 800 yet they are still very usable imo. Usually the limit is at iso 400, but these shots are quite decent for such high isos. Just make sure when you zoom in, wait for it to load when you view it on the photo viewer.
[ This Message was edited by: reeflotz on 2013-08-18 04:25 ] |
Ricky D
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK (living in Beijing)
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-08-18 00:17:35, nightwing369 wrote:
Do you think there's still a chance that Sony will release Honami with Android 4.3, on the day that they release Honami?
No, the 14.1.x firmwares are 4.2. There has been no sign of any later firmwares being approved as yet.
I have a dig bick
You read that wrong |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
Seems to me some of the guys here are just posting in this thread to troll, those of you who criticizes the samples for being crap must get a DSLR, with all due respect, I'm challenging everyone to hotlink a clean noise free and detailed cameraphone sample here in this thread shot at that ISO800-1000 and prove me wrong. 
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:50 ] 10 years at Esato |
kurtdean
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: WONDERLAND
PM |
On 2013-08-18 05:48:48, razec wrote:
Seems to me some of the guys here are just posting in this thread to troll, those of you who criticizes the samples for being crap must get a DSLR, with all due respect, I'm challenging everyone to hotlink a clean noise free and detailed cameraphone sample here in this thread shot at that ISO800-1000 and prove me wrong.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:50 ]
Yup, Show us lumia 1020, galaxy s4 and Iphone 5 at ISO1000 |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
Those people clearly didn't check the EXIF data or have no idea what is high ISO photography the last time I checked dpreview.com, even the 808 pureview at full resolution looked crap at such setting
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:59 ] 10 years at Esato |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
I've to agree with Razec, some people here are just hell bent on mindless trolling. If the pics are crap we will say that, nobody is gonna sugarcoat the crappy nature of the pics.
But before saying "crap" kindly go and compare ISO1000 low light shots from other cameraphones and also cybershot HX50V. To me these samples look comparable to the HX50V. |
kurtdean
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: WONDERLAND
PM |
On 2013-08-18 05:57:43, razec wrote:
Those people clearly didn't check the EXIF data or have no idea what is high ISO photography the last time I checked dpreview.com, even the 808 pureview at full resolution looked crap at such setting
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 04:59 ]
I'm not very good at photography and I'm not a photographer so I'm a noob but don't these people know that high ISO lead to more grain in picture? It's not so complicated |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
Ok time for some reality check...
my ancient canon 1100D (APS-C) vs HX200v (1/2.3" sensor) vs Galaxy Camera (1/2.3" sensor) vs 808 pureview (at full resolution mode 8mp)
my ancient canon 1100D (APS-C) vs HX200v (1/2.3" sensor) vs Galaxy Camera (1/2.3" sensor) vs 808 pureview (at pureview mode 8mp)
ALL SHOT AT ISO 800
I did my part on the challenge, now where were those trolls who are expecting brilliant pictures at ISO800-1000? 
my apologies for these seemingly arrogant post, but I want some of you guys to get the point, higher ISO leads to noise, and that's normal. TBH those examples reflect those that I've seen previously. I once said Honami's photos are good up to ISO400, and photos shot at ISO800 above are very noisy, and that's what exactly reflects with these leaked samples isn't it?
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-08-18 05:20 ] 10 years at Esato |
moogoo
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: NYC
PM, WWW
|
come on guys.. don't even waste your time defending anything against people who clearly just want to trash the photo samples, honami, and sony. i'm not sure what pleasure they get out of doing it, but i guess everyone has their hobbies.
truthfully, the pictures are crappy.. but basically any camera phone and most point and shoots at that high of an ISO will produce crappy pictures. so it's not really saying anything.
i'm not worried 
moogoo
Nokia 5160 -> Nokia 8260 -> SE T68i -> SE K700i -> SE Z710 -> SE Xperia X10a -> Sony Xperia S -> Sony Xperia Z1 -> Sony Xperia XZ -> Sony Xperia XZ Premium -> Sony Xperia 1ii
Website: https://www.mikedoesitall.com |
milukugiuniu
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: 291
PM |
Trolls are always trolls wherever you prove. They may get paid to do so to make a living. So it is wise for all of us to just leave them alone. |
kurtdean
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: WONDERLAND
PM |
LOL. Samsung galaxy camera with it's 16mp and similar size sensor looks crap compared to sony hx200v. I thought lower mp will lead to better image quality
[ This Message was edited by: kurtdean on 2013-08-18 05:35 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
and look at that prized 808 pureview, at full res ISO800 the HX200V is trashing it. at 8MP pureview mode, it may look alot less noisier than the cybershot, but it resolves alot less details, so much for oversampling
10 years at Esato |
supercoolman
Joined: Jun 04, 2013
Posts: > 500
PM |
this defending against troll by razec is good. you can learn something today  |
kurtdean
Joined: Nov 11, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: WONDERLAND
PM |
Suddently, the trolls seems so quite here. I wonder what happened  |
|
|
Posted: 2013-08-18 02:53
Hazel J20i [Bricked], Sony Xperia Go 
