| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
10123
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-04-29 23:20:29, plankgatan wrote:
and blerk, i dont think you realize how good c902 photo flash is IF you use it properly.
(its way better then ordinary led)
macro flash
full darkness......~1m
full darkness.......~1.5m
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-29 22:27 ]
The c902 flash is really bad, as does apply to all flashes on phones, it isnt really a flash, more like a white light. Thats why i am getting rid of my c902, i am getting a c905 for the exeon flash |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
10123...well, my flash works great (especially outdoor at night, such a improvement on the quality), by the way, who gives a crap, just get rid of it and buy a new phone who fits you better.
-------------------------------------------------
on topic....
its hard to don't use the camera when it produce such insane colours and everything 
super-vibrant
super-contrast
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-30 22:31 ] |
GNandGS
Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Posts: 54
From: Kuala Lumpur
PM |
Seems to me the only issue with low light macro on the C902 is that the LED is stronger than past cameras. That is good in some cases and less so in others. Ideal would be a lower flash setting for closeup shots or even better a toggle for "high" and "low".
Until then, the lower powered LED's may produce better macro shots in low light.
Very tough also to find the best angles and all that... sometimes better to play around with focusing in one spot (to read that locations light/dark) then snapping the spot you want. Etc etc etc. Not really point at shoot at that point. Ditto for covering the flash partially. |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
Picture of my bedsheets in a dark room, flash fired. Full size looks good normally these kind of patterns are not so easy to capture.
Full: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=19439
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
ha en fin Valborg alla svensk jävlar 
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-01 03:00 ] |
cia3194
Joined: Oct 13, 2008
Posts: 23
PM |
Some more pictures taken with my C902:
A race car:
Some of my friends sitting on a broken bench...:
Until the bench broke for real  :
My cat standing on the fridge and listening to radio:
E85 through Bacau, Romania (taken from the rooftop of the building my grandparents live in):
Mom:
And some flowers:
 |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
Full size: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19462
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
1 May..........important day regarding Politic, etc, here in Sweden
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-01 18:03 ] |
Pitzon
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Sweden
PM |
Cool house, pic taken through my car windscreen
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
indoor feels a bit better with 038, really nice colours & focus
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-01 21:59 ] |
10123
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
its quite strange, I had not this good quality with my former firmware 037 as i have with latest 038, (same cam driver 2.1). so its obvious SE change something inside the driver, but still keep the driver number.
its especially landscape who looks more solid now.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19488
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-02 17:30 ] |
10123
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-02 18:12:19, plankgatan wrote:
its quite strange, I had not this good quality with my former firmware 037 as i have with latest 038, (same cam driver 2.1). so obvious SE change something inside the driver, but not change the driver number.
its especially landscape who looks more solid now.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19488
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-02 17:22 ]
Are you going to get the C903 as your next phone as the camera quality is exactly the same? |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
ive seen a few macro pics by c903 and im not super-impressed, my c902 produce better then so, (no doubt about it).
just because it have same camera (if it now have so, only SE who have the answer), it dosent mean it must produce same quality, (different branding, software, etc)
so my answer is No !
edit. (this c903 pics ive seen is shot with R1DA028...likely some beta fw. (just for the record))
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-02 17:56 ] |
10123
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-02 18:47:28, plankgatan wrote:
ive seen a few macro pics by c903 and im not super-impressed, my c902 produce better then so, (no doubt about it).
just because it have same camera (if it now have so, only SE who have the answer), it dosent mean it must produce same quality, (different branding, software, etc)
so my answer is No !
edit. (this c903 pics ive seen is shot with R1DA028...likely some beta fw. (just for the record))
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-02 17:56 ]
GSM arena think otherwise "To sum up, at this stage the Sony Ericsson C903 outputs an identical image quality to Sony Ericsson C902. We expected at least a little improvement but it looks like the lens, the processing logic and the image sensor used are the same as in the C902. We have seen what Sony Ericsson are capable of with the superb image quality of the C905 camera, and we hoped to see at least a bit of its glory here in the C903 too."
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-04-30 17:46
