| Author |
Sony PSP Discussion (with 'live' pics and FAQ) |
MikLSP
Joined: Sep 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: se-nse.com
PM |
@ MonsterOfArt
WOW, no mine doesn't have anywhere near that much!
What version of the programme do u have & where'd u get it?
I got mine via the link I just posted & it says "Image Converter 2 for Clie MP4 Version"
_________________
Posted, as always, from my P905!
Bought from Esato Market? Leave feedback:
The A-Z Of Trusted Sellers
[ This Message was edited by: MikLSP on 2005-02-04 23:37 ] |
|
|
psikey
Joined: Jan 31, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Looks a nicely polished piece of software. Pitty not for PC 
|
themarques
Joined: Jan 26, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: London, Tokyo,
PM |
@JoolsG4 Yeah I used iPSP its not bad but I prefer altShiva which works very well plus its more in depth in the config
|
MonsterOfArt
Joined: May 21, 2004
Posts: 79
PM, WWW
|
I got mine from a link on a PSP forum, but can't find it again,
You tryed reinstalling a fresh copy and copying all the filles in the patch to the correct folders, replacing the files?
I managed to get it working first time. |
MikLSP
Joined: Sep 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: se-nse.com
PM |
Did yours install fully first time?
The forum I got mine from said it doesn't work properly on a UK operating system so they provided a backup from a fully installed one so u can replace the missing files after the initial incomplete installation. After that it works.
I'll try uninstalling & repeating the whole process though.
|
sieg dante
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 89
PM |
just a little question..y sony don't use their own screen on their psp but used sharp and samsung screen? thanks.. |
zMastaa
Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 77
From: Manchester, UK
PM, WWW
|
Save money and keep cost low
Site Admin of PSPcrazy.com
View my blog at zmastaa.com |
sieg dante
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 89
PM |
but sony also need to pay money to sharp and samsung for using their screen right? |
zMastaa
Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 77
From: Manchester, UK
PM, WWW
|
But cost less to make it themselves and could save time of having problems and faults
Site Admin of PSPcrazy.com
View my blog at zmastaa.com |
sieg dante
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 89
PM |
i see..thanks for the reply  |
MikLSP
Joined: Sep 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: se-nse.com
PM |
The Sharp screen is so good I'm not bothered who made it 
However I haven't seen the apparently cheaper & inferior Samsung screen yet. As I said before it will be a shame if its not as good but then again, it won't bother me as I've got a Sharp screen! 
|
MonsterOfArt
Joined: May 21, 2004
Posts: 79
PM, WWW
|
@MikLSP - I didn't have to do anything with my version when I installed it, worked fine only with all the text replaced with ???????? and some japanese text here and there. |
psikey
Joined: Jan 31, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Just converted Incredibles at 1500kbps/128kbps and it came out at 901,908KB !!!
Still fits on 1GB DUO though & looks fantastic. Real DVD quality! Can't imagine how UMD movies can get much better.
File size may be bigger because this is a true widescreen version while the other movie I did was 16:9 |
MikLSP
Joined: Sep 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: se-nse.com
PM |
Hey Monster, it'd be great if u could find the place u d/loaded it from. I've unistalled & reinstalled & done everything right but still not all English.
@ psikey
 Thats one BIG file!!
Whats the difference between Widescreen & 16:9 that would cause a larger file size?
|
psikey
Joined: Jan 31, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Forget that. The Incedibles movie length is 1hr 55mins while the other one is 1hr 35mins.
The amount of compression will also vary on the movie I suppose.
I also had a look at the 768 & 1500 movies again a bit closer to see if there was any noticeable difference and there was more pixilation on the 768 in places but no pixilation/blockiness at all at 1500.
[ This Message was edited by: psikey on 2005-02-05 13:26 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-02-04 23:55
