| Author |
Nokia N73 vs SE K800i which is better? |
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: GMT +2
PM |
@Mario- agree with you on the edge issue. I feel SE should, and me thinks they're moving towards that next year, use edge more on their mobiles. However, I differ with you on the smartphone market. The jury is still out there on that one. That market is still open, not as wide but is not completely lost to any of the major players. |
|
|
SloopJohnB
Joined: Oct 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: the blue planet
PM |
the ībug freeī part was really funny.
Now people instead of appealing to subjective feelings to try and upgrade k800 to N73īs level or even better, they are trying to do it by trying to diminish nokia, showing bad techs or phones of the past. Whats the point?
Cīmon people, u may like  and all and may have choosen k800 because that but N73 IS BETTER than k800. Just live with it!!! |
DragonEye
Joined: Sep 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Canada
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-03 18:21:52, SloopJohnB wrote:
the ībug freeī part was really funny.
Now people instead of appealing to subjective feelings to try and upgrade k800 to N73īs level or even better, they are trying to do it by trying to diminish nokia, showing bad techs or phones of the past. Whats the point?
Cīmon people, u may like and all and may have choosen k800 because that but N73 IS BETTER than k800. Just live with it!!!
|
|
it's not better... though... because.. wait for it... wait ... wait.. se has a XENON flash...
and then... response... all se people talk about is xenon flash.. my n73 takes better pics.. look at this link.. people agree too..
blah blah on and on and on..
just get a motorola
_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
MyProfile http://www.howardforums.com/m[....]s=&action=getinfo&userid=20841
[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2006-11-03 20:12 ] |
nalbagli
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Posts: 302
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-03 18:21:52, SloopJohnB wrote:
the ībug freeī part was really funny.
Now people instead of appealing to subjective feelings to try and upgrade k800 to N73īs level or even better, they are trying to do it by trying to diminish nokia, showing bad techs or phones of the past. Whats the point?
Cīmon people, u may like and all and may have choosen k800 because that but N73 IS BETTER than k800. Just live with it!!!
|
|
I dont like or use symbian so what makes N73 so better? |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Me neither.
To be honest if someone really wanted a phone/business handset they would go for something like the m600,nokia e61,p990 or even a Blackberry.
Majority of people I know who have symbian phones dont even hardley use s60 applications anyway. |
Mano Khan
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 50
From: Karachi,Jeddah
PM, WWW
|
Hey !!! You ppl shud know that Nokia was the first 2 introduce camera phone Symbian phone and Memory card so ppl Please dont argue on SE vs NOkia its again a lion vs a goat ...NOTHING ON THE WORLD CAN BEAT NOKIA ... and dont mess with Pakistan or QVGA other wise .... :@ |
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: GMT +2
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 09:20:23, Mano Khan wrote:
Hey !!! You ppl shud know that Nokia was the first 2 introduce camera phone Symbian phone and Memory card so ppl Please dont argue on SE vs NOkia its again a lion vs a goat ...NOTHING ON THE WORLD CAN BEAT NOKIA ... and dont mess with Pakistan or QVGA other wise .... :@
|
|
Oh please, by all means do enlighten us. What phone was that? |
sesukaku
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 127
PM |
lol.. ppl here really really funny... the more i read.. the funnier it gets. Ppl keep saying that N73 is BETTER than K800. Can anyone proof it? in what way it is better? feature wise? because it is a S60? Does S60 makes a lot of difference? c'mon.. its not that powerful and i know it. Nokia's smartphone for S60 is super mediocre that it doesnt even look like a smartphone!! It really looks like a normal phone to me. Btw, we really do live with the fact if we have to admit that N73 takes a better shot in the day time, so what? it takes a good picture like 50% of the day (considering 12 hours of daytime and 12 hours of night time) and K800 takes 100% decent pictures for 100% of the day (well, the quality is ONLY SLIGHTLY LESS better anyway) and you still have to live in the fact that K800 is MORE POPULAR than N73. ^___^. So, can u still prove that it is better? |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 10:27:01, sesukaku wrote:
lol.. ppl here really really funny... the more i read.. the funnier it gets. Ppl keep saying that N73 is BETTER than K800. Can anyone proof it? in what way it is better? feature wise? because it is a S60? Does S60 makes a lot of difference? c'mon.. its not that powerful and i know it. Nokia's smartphone for S60 is super mediocre that it doesnt even look like a smartphone!! It really looks like a normal phone to me. Btw, we really do live with the fact if we have to admit that N73 takes a better shot in the day time, so what? it takes a good picture like 50% of the day (considering 12 hours of daytime and 12 hours of night time) and K800 takes 100% decent pictures for 100% of the day (well, the quality is ONLY SLIGHTLY LESS better anyway) and you still have to live in the fact that K800 is MORE POPULAR than N73. ^___^. So, can u still prove that it is better?
|
|
K800 is more popular because its cheaper than N73, its as simple as that. |
sesukaku
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 127
PM |
yep, that's right!! cheaper as well... not like the bloody overprice N73 right? ehehhe |
Dups!
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: GMT +2
PM |
@Mano Khan- the J-SH04 made by Sharp corporation back in november 2000 was the first camera phone. Granted, between Nokia and SE symbian is the former's domain but still nokia didn't come up with the first camera phone before Ericsson. Fair enough they went a step further by integrating the camera into the phone but the t68 had a plug in camera back in 2001. As for the memory quick that's Sony invention.
[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2006-11-04 11:11 ]
[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2006-11-04 11:15 ] |
Mano Khan
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 50
From: Karachi,Jeddah
PM, WWW
|
Yeah .... But i was trying 2 say tht first VGA camera and phone with memory card was 6600 |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 10:31:06, sesukaku wrote:
yep, that's right!! cheaper as well... not like the bloody overprice N73 right? ehehhe
|
|
Why wouldnt it be more expensive? It has a bigger screen, HTML browsing, S60(new version), 3G and EDGE both, not like SE where edge and 3G are on different version of phones. It also has better video recording.
Tell me, why wouldnt it be expensive? |
sesukaku
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 127
PM |
QVGA... there are reasons why it will be expensive. As you said that it has EDGE, Symbian S60.. i am really really skeptical about the "features" that you are talking about. First of all.. the EDGE itself. Why would you need EDGE? if you have 3G? Do you really need them? What is the phone mean for you? browse internet (why not computer? its alot cheaper, and faster as well) are you the sort of person who are sooo busy that you must travel everywhere and thus you have no access to internet? How many ppl are like that?
Second, S60. I have N70 before. That is Symbian S60. What do i use that for? Edit microsoft word? yea.. that's what i thought at first.. then i use it once. Guess what? i think that's a waste of time. The keypad really doesn't support me to be able to input the text as quick as the standard qwerty keyboard (the same of course goes for N73, so technically you DO NOT REALLY NEED that). I also found that i can type alot faster even with my K750 keypad. It is even faster if i simply write down my work. So, what's the point of having symbian S60?
You are into business man, you need calendar.. so? K800 has that as well, i use K750 for calendar though. I found that it is alot easier to use with sony ericsson phones than Nokia. Look, this is happens because i am so used to with K750 calendar (so you might not want to take this as a real point.. hehe.. im just being fair here).
If you are talking about video recording.. yes, K800 is really hopeless. So, that's ok, its not the end of my life for not having a 352X288 video recorder. right? in fact, the camera in K800 is very very very very useful (i use it to take picture of the document that i can't be bother to photocopy it). With K750 and K800 in my pocket i actually can handle everything that i need to do my course ^___^, which N70 doesn't.
At least i must say that K800 has a pretty decent video playback and i am very happy with it (I use it as an Ipod video, and i use K750 as an Ipod).
So, i pay for what i need and what i use and what i got.
If i buy N73... If i connect to 3G. Do i need EDGE? why do i have to pay for it? it is INDEED a waste of money. Thats why it is more expensive for me.
And as i explain to u, after i had N70, then i realise that i don't need symbian, do i need to pay for it? No.
and regarding the bigger screen.. i think K800 is enough, and i found that it has the same size as D600. Its not too bad. So, no probs.
last but not least. If i have a video recorder that might be fantastic, although i might not really use it that often. perhaps that's one and only point that gives me reason why i should go for N73. In the end of the day, you might find that N73 really really overprice (you pay for sthing you do not need, for the sake of feature wise only..).
Btw, here in australia if you have K800, you need to pay 18X24 on contract, and that makes it 432. N73 is 22X24 and that is 528. that is like 96 dolars different in price. That's quite a lot for me, just for the sake of video recording isn't it? i know, that there is no video recording device to be sell at that price. But, it is better to save my money ^__^. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
EDGE and 3G SHOULD be in one phone. For example, where i live, i got EDGE but no 3G. I enjoy EDGE. But from what i've heard, within the next year 3G will be introduced, so if i want to use it, i dont need to sell my phone, i can use it in my current one. And then if i find out that 3G doesnt suit me, or if its too expensive, i can switch back to EDGE without having to change my phone for the second time. |
|
|
Posted: 2006-11-03 18:20
