| Author |
S700, S65, 7610 cam quality comparison (Live Pictures) |
Guy89
Joined: May 18, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM |
s700 is da best no doubt about it
 P905 |
|
|
Clearday
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Posts: 95
From: Istanbul, Turkey
PM, WWW
|
well,S700 will be a standart phone in the market,I think you cant compare any phone camera with s700i,coz it s far more good than others,I cant see a difference between the casio 4,0 mpx and S700,and I cant understand why it s like that...
So the line and the future of the mobile phone will be the block to cameras,and replace them...so What s the camera s future here?
|
jontyf
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
Posts: 468
From: Hertfordshire, England
PM |
Wow great pics.
More more more
Elle - "...Which in the very near future, will be my sword"
Bea - "Bitch, you dont have a future..."
Bea - "... What did you say to Pai Mey to make him snatch out your eye?" |
manunitedfan
Joined: Oct 10, 2004
Posts: 85
PM |
luk i knew u lot wud bum lick the s700, yeah its slightly better but not on another world, the sl65 has suprisignly good shots and in different lightings im sure the 7610 is better for pics thn the s700 , yeah s700 is better but by ur lots reactions its as if its a 2 billion mega pixel camera! |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
S65 has suprisingly good shots? It should at least be on par with the nokia, but is lagging way behind in quality.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-14 22:28:06, manunitedfan wrote:
luk i knew u lot wud bum lick the s700, yeah its slightly better but not on another world, the sl65 has suprisignly good shots and in different lightings im sure the 7610 is better for pics thn the s700 , yeah s700 is better but by ur lots reactions its as if its a 2 billion mega pixel camera!
|
|
Youre kinda not making any sence here - first of the S65 takes crap pictures, secondly if it did take good pictures then why would it be surprising, it has 1.3mp camera like S700 and the 7610 only has 1mp - by that definition it should not be surprising if they were better than atleast the 7610, but they arent. Third, why should the 7610 take better pictures than S700 in different lighting ?
Youre talking utter nonsense 
Finally the S700 shurely is no to be compared with a 2 billion mega pixel camera  but it very clearly takes the best pictures by far in this comparison. Even after the resizing from Esato the pictures from S700 are clearly sharper, with more detail and better colordefinition. Had the pictures not been resized by Esato the difference would have been even bigger
[ This Message was edited by: TheRealSpawn on 2004-10-14 22:19 ] |
zyavar
Joined: Jun 11, 2003
Posts: 154
From: Kent, United Kingdom
PM |
totally agree!
as i have tested them all, and have seen more pic comparison myself than the ones i have posted here, i can firmly say that the S700i's cam is better in any lighting condition than the 7610!
yes SE did have a problem in the past with low lighting conditions, but its been totally sorted in the S700!
Regards
|
wag
Joined: Jul 03, 2004
Posts: 17
From: Russia, St.Petersburg
PM |
Why not compare the prices as well? Then giggle.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
what would be the point of comparing prices ?
Price is not related to camera only.
Then we should also start comparing Screen, playbackabilities etc. etc.
This thread is only a comparison of cameraquality - not of the phones or their prices in general.
|
zyavar
Joined: Jun 11, 2003
Posts: 154
From: Kent, United Kingdom
PM |
See Mot V3 Razr here:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=72214
|
dw123
Joined: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 76
PM |
I think the S700 pictures on the close up are better then the others, but the pics of the poster the S65 is a little clearer if you examine the writing. All are really similar, and TBH if you want to take decent pictures then buy a proper digicam. |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
SE S700 is the winner amongst the 3! |
WarwickChi
Joined: May 15, 2004
Posts: 28
PM |
glad didn't go for S65...... |
dw123
Joined: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 76
PM |
s700 has nice features and very good screen, but it is a little bit ugly for a phone. |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
when I went to the CPW in colchester, one of the guys tried to get me to buy the siemens, telling me it was the best out of the three.
one question, to ALL s700 owners.
I've been playing with it for ages now, and i've noticed that in some lighting conditions, (my room at night with a halogen bulb) or (in the bar in a fairly dark lit area) the camera's quality is VERY bad (unless I use nightmode which smooths it out. Additionally, the more well lit the area is, the faster the view finder loads the image otherwise it's laggy.
Is this the same with everyone else?
|
|
|
Posted: 2004-10-14 10:48
P905 
