| Author |
wich cam is better? K700 or 6230? |
Ayush
Joined: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Hyderabad, india
PM |
Then one might add..what's the use of mp3 with only 41 mb memory 
Ayush  |
|
|
thiagobs
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 14
PM |
What is IMO (Sorry but i am from brazil)?
And 1.2 megapixel mode in k700 is good or regular quality?
And the pics normaly pixeleted (pixels are strong visible)?
[ This Message was edited by: thiagobs on 2004-09-30 13:16 ] |
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
yeah i suppose. but the both phones are geared up towards taking pictures and making videos. the mp3 player is just a nice added feature. the K700 screen does the video + camera capabilities justice. the 6230 doesnt.
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-30 14:15:44, thiagobs wrote:
What is IMO (Sorry but i am from brazil)?
[ This Message was edited by: thiagobs on 2004-09-30 13:16 ]
|
|
IMO= In MY Opinion
[ This Message was edited by: 50Cent on 2004-09-30 13:17 ] |
bahraini
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 361
PM |
6230 has 3.5mm vga cam
while k700 has 4.1mm vga cam
so its better |
kooki
Joined: Jul 13, 2004
Posts: 381
From: bangalore, india
PM |
k7 is much better
ther is no point having so many features with such a small screen
infact i would prefer my t630 to a 6230 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
No contest! The SE K700i is far much better than Nokia's 6230 when it comes to image/picture and screen resolution - quality ! |
kooki
Joined: Jul 13, 2004
Posts: 381
From: bangalore, india
PM |
the 6230 is a very boring phone
the 'grid' menu system is a lame attempt by nokia to copy the SE interface
the newer phones with themes are also a copy from SE and they are pathetic!! |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
for pictures k700 is better my dad has the 6230 and i have the k700 the pics on screen and comp r better from the k700!!
WAYNE ROONEY!!! WHOOOO best thing to come out of england since drum n bass |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
the K700 beat the 6230 hands down in every aspect ecxept for expandable memory.
Screen: K700 176x220 pixel vs 6230 128x128 pixel - much better screen
Themesupport: K700 only !
Videorecording: K700 unlimited up to 41mb vs 6230 limited to 4mb
Videorecording: K700 176x144 pixel vs 6230 128x96 pixels
Videoplayback: K700 176x144pixel with HighQ AAC audio vs 6230 only 128x96 pixel with LowQ AMR audio
Poly: K700 40tones vs 6230 24tones
Camera: K700 fotolight vs 6230 none
Camera: K700 panoramamode vs 6230 not
Camera: K700 fun frames vs 6230 ??
Camera: Overall quality - K700 best under good lightingconditions, 6230 best under poor lightingconditions.
|
macdid
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 65
From: earth
PM |
wat about moto398 cam?i think the fone is great
This message was posted from a WAP device |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@therealspawn
Quote:
| the K700 beat the 6230 hands down in every aspect ecxept for expandable memory. |
|
without the memory slot the K700 is already very disadvantaged compared to the 6230. i dont think anyone can truly believe when they say 41Mb is more than enough. (remember Bill of MS with his famous 640K memory comment)
i have nothing against K700. in fact both these phones (K700 and 6230) do not interest me. based on my own experience, something like 128Mb would be more appropriate for a phone with such capability.
|
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
ayush, i always take 11 mp4 songs with me to the gym, plus the radio, and still have free space for other things...itīs perfectly enough...when i need more music (itīs rare), i use my proper mp3 player...but for normal everyday use, the 42mb are more than enough
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb |
kooki
Joined: Jul 13, 2004
Posts: 381
From: bangalore, india
PM |
moto e398 sucks
i know a lot of ppl who hav it and they are suffering
the k7s cam is better
polyphonic ringtones suck on that phone (worse than the nokia 3100)
it has a lot of bluetooth conectivity probs
the only advantage are the speakers |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
LUK THE k700 IS BETTER AT TAKING PICS THAN THE 6230 SURELY WE CAN FINALLY CONCLUDE THIS!. plus its a better fone, thts the end of tht really, nuff sed |
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
They are very similar phones, for people taking photos sure, the k700, but if you need a memory card then its got to be the 6230. And shouting your point across doesnt make us think you are any more right.
Hello, Scroto!
U.G.L.Y. You ain't got no alibi, you ugly! |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-30 14:13
