Author |
Statement about /// |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
I never use t9. On r520 i wrote like dis 2 b faster but later i changf it 4 d advise of @masseur. Thx for the comments especially @scotty
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
Vlammetje Joined: Mar 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Den Haag PM, WWW
|
hmmmmmmmmmmm
although you must most certainly do whatever you please I for example, not being a longstanding Ericsson fan, have taken considerable time to figure out what on earth you meant with your /////////////////////// all over the place.
Apart from that I find the use of text language appalling and disrespectful to the reader, but that's a whole different topic right there.
What i have not quite figured out yet is why you posted this thread. So you like Ericsson. We all know that? Why did it need further explanation?
|
701 Joined: Nov 26, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Romania PM, WWW
|
I wanna say 1 thing: the design is still in the Ericsson 'standards',still resembling the clear cuts from the 90s. I find this elegant.
This message was posted from a T610 |
Vlammetje Joined: Mar 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Den Haag PM, WWW
|
I am sort of curious why many people are so eager to see Sony and Ericsson as two halves rather than one whole
You DO realise it is in fact 1 new company and not just the mobile branch of each working together?
Why can't we get over the fact that a merger took place 3 years ago and focus on this new company that is doing reasonably well imho and still has a lot to offer to all of us?
|
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
Vlammetje: as mentioned in my first post, many asked for an answer. It easier to give an explination then go off topic or write the same in many pms.
This message was posted from a T630 |
Vlammetje Joined: Mar 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Den Haag PM, WWW
|
Aprt from that...... I gotta say.... this is not the first thread to relish the 'unmatched qualities and beauties of past Ericsson design' and to loathe the influence of Sony on the current products of .... but to be quite honest it's starting to make me feel the same way Jehova Witnesses make me feel....... you're all free to think and believe what you like but I'm getting seriously discomfortable at the ferocity with which some feel Ericsson should be defended.
Some of us out here actually LIKE and wouldn't go back to the pre- merger days for anything in the world. I am one of those and I would be quite happy if wasn't dissed in favour of a company that would NOT have made it to begin with.
Thank you
|
scotsboyuk Joined: Jun 02, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: UK PM, WWW
|
@Vlamm
Hear hear old girl! Rather nicely put.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
I am used to it to answer to a question, so i dared to take the easiest and most comfortable option to do it.
This message was posted from a T630 |
Jake Blues Joined: May 24, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
@boba thats your choice, i have no problem with text language, certainly not as much as vlamettje! but i think you created a whole new language of your own!
[addsig] |
ares Joined: Dec 11, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Coimbra, Portugal PM |
I think the SE is actually a better mobile phone company that ever a separated sony or ericsson would be. It's a perfect merge :-]
This message was posted from a K700i |
|