| Author |
SE T610 vs. Samsung E700 |
davo87
Joined: Mar 22, 2003
Posts: 204
From: UK
PM |
you can IR pics n phonebook entries but only samsung 2 samsung
and before you all start you can only send pics from sony to sony (with the exception of some nokia ones) It does state this on samsung website, so its not like you dont kno before you buy. Every phone manufacturer uses different Ir protocols |
|
|
Vlammetje
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Den Haag
PM, WWW
|
Yes I kow but I for one am in favour of worldwide compatibility. What's the use otherwise 
|
neilmusgrove
Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Posts: 19
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-11-06 22:01:46, davo87 wrote:
you can IR pics n phonebook entries but only samsung 2 samsung
and before you all start you can only send pics from sony to sony (with the exception of some nokia ones) ... Every phone manufacturer uses different Ir protocols
|
|
Well i can send and recieve phonebook entries with Nokias and Everything (Pics, mid's etc) with my mates Siemens.
Nokias cannot transfer pictures or ringtones though - crap!
[ This Message was edited by: neilmusgrove on 2003-11-06 23:52 ] |
Dj Boyi
Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Liberty City
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-11-06 22:01:46, davo87 wrote:
you can IR pics n phonebook entries but only samsung 2 samsung
and before you all start you can only send pics from sony to sony (with the exception of some nokia ones) It does state this on samsung website, so its not like you dont kno before you buy. Every phone manufacturer uses different Ir protocols
|
|
Like i said before somewhere,my t68i/t610 both work like a dream with my missus's panasonic gd 87 
Stop misleading people!!!
If nobody wants it.. put it on eBay. |
davo87
Joined: Mar 22, 2003
Posts: 204
From: UK
PM |
I got my E700 yesterday, and the quality of the pictures and the screen beat the crap out of my mates T610, okay it may not have bluetooth but its still worth lookin, Its also a lot easier to use than the t610!
[addsig] |
Z___Z
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Posts: 98
PM |
Se phones usesthe industrial standard ir protocol. Thats why you can send stuf to your phone without extra software. Nokia and samsung you need crapy software to send anything to your phone. So dont say every manufacturer user its own standard. I think every manufacturer should use the industrial standard.
This message was posted from a T68i |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
E700 do have mms - and it does easyli transfer pics through ir to your pc.
|
sn3ipen
Joined: Aug 18, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: North-Norway
PM, WWW
|
IR sucks compared to 
[ This Message was edited by: t610 owner on 2003-11-09 14:43 ] |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
IR sucks ? What a ridicoulus statement.
Like all statements that include the word "sucks" - its so nokiash and illeterate.
I never had any troubles using Ir and never had any use for bluetooth what so ever.
I have a T610 and a P800 with bluetooth - never used it.
It depends on needs - if you have no specific need for attaching bluetooth devices, Ir will do just fine for syncronisation and transfer of pics, polys etc.
[ This Message was edited by: TheRealSpawn on 2003-11-09 15:31 ] |
nauti_n_cool
Joined: Aug 28, 2003
Posts: 91
From: Bangalore, India
PM |
Hey... e700 looks like a camshell to me !! u gotta open it to use right...wont T610 be smaller then ???
And for those comparing the above, i think u should talk of T630 v/s E700....  wins!!! |
madve-cz
Joined: Aug 04, 2003
Posts: 39
From: Gyongyos, Hungary
PM |
@davo
And how many themes would you download for it?
Anyway, it looks pretty good. And it is sooo small. I like the design.
@all
I tried to send pics from v2oo to v2oo. It didn't work. If any1 had done it succesfully, you should share the process with me.
[ This Message was edited by: madve-cz on 2003-11-09 18:52 ] |
ratGT
Joined: Sep 29, 2002
Posts: 69
From: Greece/Sweden
PM, WWW
|
I've always showed interest for every new Samsung mobile. It's the only Asian mobile-maker that gives me the overall feel of quality and careful design. And because their clam-mobiles have usually been silver/metallic (their overall coloring), it gives you the feel of a 'serious'/expensive/business/classy phone.
Seing the TV and magazine ads for their latest, the E700, it made think "Hmm, a bit different than the past ones, but still stylish" (Different, because of the added dark-blue parts), plus that I liked the idea of snapping a continuous series of pictures.
Unfortunately, I changed my mind again, after seeing magazine and www pictures of it from reviews. That particular new addition, the colored part, gives it actually a 'cheaper' feel. Of course, this is always a matter of taste. But in my opinion, this just makes it look more 'plastic' than it should. A Samsung mobile suddenly lost some of it's solid classy look. How sad. I hope they correct this on their future models. And still NO Bluetooth??? Oh no no no!... I don't accept this! ;P On the positive side again, its menus look a bit 'cleaner'...
In all, it's ok. It's not a hit, like some of the past Samsung models, but it's a nice addition to the clam-variety in the mobile market...
PS. As I always say, faithful SE palyaz (like me) and faithful Knockia users, stick to your favourite brand... Asian phones and their menus are still weird and irritating for us!...
PS.2 Bluetooth has always been a basic factor for me on whether I'll buy a new mobile, since I started using it (The most hassle-free communication between my computer and my mobile). Especially after the addition to the T610 of being able to exchange files in FTP-style, I can't live without Bluetooth!...
|
eric2004ut
Joined: Apr 18, 2003
Posts: 54
From: Eric
PM |
I have a few things to say about some model phones. i got a samsung x105 open face phone. it beats the sony ericcson t300
This message was posted from a WAP device |
Vlammetje
Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Den Haag
PM, WWW
|
I am happy for you
|
eric2004ut
Joined: Apr 18, 2003
Posts: 54
From: Eric
PM |
also nokia 3595 and moto t193 and nokia 3390 gold
This message was posted from a WAP device |
|
|
Posted: 2003-11-06 22:01
