Author |
New!!! Nokia 6600 & 3100 etc |
nils7 Joined: Feb 02, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Europe PM, WWW
|
First of all I want to apologise (do you spell that so?)
to open a different topic over the 6600
Well I think its a nice phone!
But the 3100 looks terrible! Like the Alcatel 310/311 damn lousy! |
|
pooass Joined: Sep 24, 2002 Posts: 10 From: Japan PM |
Butt ugly? Look at SE's latest designs to see really butt ugly phones. They look even worse than old ericcson phones from 5 years back. No wonder they're going bankrupt soon.
I have one of these beauties in my hand right now and it's size is good and looks cool. Maybe you just realised that SE has nothing good to offer in the same class and that's why you try to bash this baby.
Yeah, you can make your self feel good to compare nokia PHONES with P800 which is rarher in COMMUNICATOR class.
Just face it, SE has lost it a long ago and will never be back in the top. |
nils7 Joined: Feb 02, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Europe PM, WWW
|
Gentlemen the specs:
(now I'm the first I hope hehehe)
The Nokia 6600 phone features new advanced imaging features, including a bright 65,536-color TFT display and camera equipped with digital zoom.
These complement a built-in video recorder with audio and a RealOne player for playback and streaming of 3GPP-compatible and RealMedia video clips.
Multimedia functions are enhanced by templates for MMS messages and a Media Gallery for organizing digital content captured or downloaded with the phone.
Advances in phone features include support for Java™ MIDP 2.0, True Tones, themes, and personalization of clock and calendar sounds.
Phone Features
Integrated digital camera with zoom
Video recorder with audio support
Streaming video and audio
Wireless connectivity with Bluetooth and infrared
6 MB internal memory
Memory card slot for additional user memory and applications.
Supports Java™ MIDP 2.0 applications
Data synchronization with PC via PC Suite
Tri-band operation in GSM E900/1800/1900 networks
Full Specifications
Size
Weight: 122 g (with BL-5C battery)
Dimensions: 108.6 x 58.2 x 23.7mm, 113cc
Display and User Interface
Bright active matrix TFT color display
65,536 colors
176 x 208 pixels
Graphical user interface with selectable themes
5-way joystick navigation
Symbian Operating System 7.0s
Integrated VGA digital camera
Camera: 640 x 480 pixel resolution; standard, portrait, and night modes; 2x digital zoom; self-timer
Video Recorder: Select picture size QCIF (176x144) or subQCIF (128x96); audio on/off; 2x digital zoom
RealOne Player: Playback and stream RealMedia and 3GPP-compliant content
Media Gallery: Easy access to and organization of all digital content (images, sounds, videos) captured with or downloaded to your phone
Memory Functions
6 MB internal shared memory for contacts, text messages, multimedia messages, ringing tones, images, video clips, calendar notes, to-do list, and applications.
Memory card slot for additional user memory.
Messaging
Multimedia messaging: Combine image, video, text and voice clip and send as MMS to compatible phone or PC; use MMS templates to tell your story with a multi-image presentation
Email: Access your work and private email accounts; supports SMTP, POP3, and IMAP4 protocols
Text messaging: Supports concatenated SMS; picture messaging; SMS distribution list
Predictive text input: Support for all major languages in Europe and Asia-Pacific
Wireless Connectivity
Bluetooth wireless technology
Infrared
Local synchronization of contacts & calendar to PC using PC Suite
Remote over-the-air synchronization with SyncML
Send and receive images, video clips, and business cards
Browsing
Advanced XHTML browser
Wallet: Convenient online use and storage of your numbers and passwords
Data Transfer
Up to 40.2Kbps in GPRS networks
Up to 43.2Kbps in HSCSD networks
Call Management
Contacts: Advanced contacts database with support for multiple phone and email details per entry, also supports thumbnail picture and groups
Speed dialing
Logs: Keeps lists of your dialed, received, and missed calls
Automatic redial
Automatic answer (works with compatible headset or car kit only)
Supports Fixed Dialing Number, which allows calls only to predefined numbers
Conference call
Java™ Applications
Downloadable Java™ MIDP 2.0 applications
Voice Features
Voice dialing
Voice commands
Voice recorder
Integrated handsfree speaker
Tri-Band Operation
Works in GSM E900/1800/1900 networks
Automatic switching between bands
Digital Services
Symbian applications available from Nokia Software Market
Graphics, icons, animations, logos
Games: possibility to download new games
Ringing tones: True Tones, polyphonic tones |
icedog445 Joined: Mar 03, 2003 Posts: 84 PM |
All it is,is a 3650 made a little smaller with some better picture functions that is for 3G.It is not meant to beat the T610.I would have gotten a 3650 the day it came out if it was smaller,and I'm sure most people would too.
Now for that SE look a like.How could they be so stupid.They know many people don't like SE's design so why would they make a phone that looks like it belings to SE.ANYWAYS NOKIAS ARE MADE LIKE ****.I WILL NEVER GET NOKIA,PROBABLY NOT GET AND SE either because they need a phone with decent reception.I'm going to get the GU87 for the time being then when the x70 hits stores I will be first to get it.HOPEFULLY.LOL. |
orange Joined: Mar 13, 2002 Posts: 397 PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-16 14:02:40, bart wrote:
...
you can't actually compare a smartphone whit a PDA but if you do, the pda ussualy wins.
|
|
Then, why don't you compare N 6600 to SE smartphone? Oh yes, there's no such thing...
What it comes to Internet in P800 and N 6600. Opera browser is available for both...For e-mail, both have support for same protocols, so where's the difference? Addiotion to these N 6600 support MIDP 2.0 with the bunch of new API's, 65 k color screen, video recorder with two image sizes, 3GPP streaming and so on... |
shklar1 Joined: Nov 27, 2001 Posts: 164 From: Israel PM, WWW
|
The Nokia 6600 looks like an egg  |
Knut.G. Joined: Mar 12, 2002 Posts: 149 PM |
Comparing this phone to P800 is just silly. The P800 with its large touchscreen is in a league of its own, end of story.
However, I do believe Nokia is going in the right direction. The Series 60 interface is not bad at all, and they are really trying to make the phones smaller and more mainstream. I hate the design though, but thats just me, and others may love it. Either way, the screen seems to be fantastic.
I just hope we can see this functionality in a T610 form factor soon.
-Knut |
Dwelling Joined: Oct 15, 2002 Posts: 68 From: Sweden PM |
Whoa, soo many threads talking about the same thing, don't know where to make my point. Um, this is supposed to be a 3G phone, right?
Well, if it is, where the hell is the camera facing the front? I want to be able to make a video-call with a 3G phone, I guess that with the Nokia this can't be done  |
Super G Joined: Mar 07, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: France PM |
As to the size of the 6600 it is 108.6x58.2, i.e. about 7 millimeters taller than T610 (but then again, the screen is larger too), and about 1.5 centimeters wider. All in all, it sounds actually quite good
I like the skin-like customization possibility of this phone. It's what I'm lacking on my series 60 right now...
Wish it was out already... Q4 is though just 3 months away  |
nils7 Joined: Feb 02, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Europe PM, WWW
|
Where the hell do people find that it supports Three? |
DragonEye Joined: Sep 26, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Canada PM |
I've been using a 3650 for a while now and this thing doesn't impress me much... it's the same damn phone but they put a conservative faceplate on it... they gave it a touch more memory..it's a waste of time..but i guess it's to convert all those 3650 haters.
does it compare to the p800?again always depends on one's needs..but it will does appeal more to the general masses becasue it's another FUN toy...just like my 3650 it's a super cool toy..in my mind cooler than a p800 and more useful for the fun"ner" parts...
I really do hope SE does come up with something new and on time to match this and offer people a "fun alternative" the t610 disappointed me and the p800 i have no need for....(still no camcorder app and 2 pricey)
but i think SE should build a smartphone with super rf...(sorry SE rf suffers greatly in NOrth America compared to those nokia's don't know why??) Pretty much a t610 with these functions and a little more "something new" and we'd all be drooling...
[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2003-06-16 15:37 ] |
laffen Joined: Aug 07, 2001 Posts: > 500 From: Oslo, Norway PM |
@Super G
You should not trust the meassurements Nokia uses for their mobile phones. In the printet May issue of the Swedish magazine Mobile, one reader measure his 6100 and 7210 and found that what's listed on the Nokia web site not matched the acctual size of the phone.
One of the editors checked their 3510i and found that Nokia's claimed 17.1 mm was on the thinest part of the phone! They meassured 21mm at the thickest part, and 17 on the thinnest.
BTW: does not meassure their phones this way. |
slattery69 Joined: Jan 03, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: north east england PM |
se dont have to measure that way as all there phones are perfect RECTANGLES with no shape
just joking although i do hate he t310
on paper i think it sounds a very good phone looks are subjective some people will love it some will hate it
also until you see it in the flesh its hard to tell
how many people liked the t610 in picture then when they saw it in the flesh fell in love with it.
dont think it a 3 g phone but either way its going to do some damage to se people who moved across because of the exellent p800 may move back to this if they looks the specs look as good if not better in some deptartments |
Super G Joined: Mar 07, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: France PM |
@ laffen
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-16 16:49:38, laffen wrote:
@Super G
You should not trust the meassurements Nokia uses for their mobile phones. In the printet May issue of the Swedish magazine Mobile, one reader measure his 6100 and 7210 and found that what's listed on the Nokia web site not matched the acctual size of the phone.
One of the editors checked their 3510i and found that Nokia's claimed 17.1 mm was on the thinest part of the phone! They meassured 21mm at the thickest part, and 17 on the thinnest.
BTW: does not meassure their phones this way.
|
|
Well... I measured my 7210 and it fits exactly to what Nokia is saying on their website i.e. 106x45x17.5mm
I also measured my NG.... and again it fits perfectly what Nokia is saying (ok, the point something millimeters, I don't get them exactly, I admit)
As to the thinnest part, they used to provide both the thinnest and thickest parts earlier, but now I agree that only one of them is listed (thinnest), for some reason...
Measures are using the metric system btw
(NASA crashed some Mars explorer or something like this due to this... ) |
nils7 Joined: Feb 02, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Europe PM, WWW
|
Look what I found....
A nice compare with the 3650 (alot smaller)
 |
|