| Author |
Pic Quality - p800 vs t610 |
Matteus
Joined: Oct 20, 2002
Posts: 372
PM |
T610 picturesize is the same as in MCA-10. I use it with satisfaction. The 352x288 size is fine on the Tungsten, also on my HP omnibook but only in small size. I even print them in workreports in 3x5 cm and they are quite sharp.
This message was posted from a T39 |
|
|
p800 kid
Joined: Jun 07, 2003
Posts: 61
PM |
65000 colours of the t610 doesnt mean that the picure quality onscreen is oing to be any better than the p800
This message was posted from a P800 |
laffen
Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
Picture taken with Sony Ericsson T610:
Picture taken with Sony Ericsson P800:
Picture taken with Sony Ericsson T610:
Picture taken with Sony Ericsson P800 where picture is scaled down on the PC to the same size as maximun resolution on the T610:
Original picture taken with Sony Ericsson P800:
|
Coramoor
Joined: Nov 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
The p800 pics have a 24bit color depth(16 million)
I don't know how many colors the t610 has...
But looking at the above pics I'd say the p800 wins...
Though they both suck... |
(zendilar)
Joined: Apr 30, 2003
Posts: 43
From: Athens GR - Paris FR
PM |
Yes you are right I have a P800 and a week ago I bout a T610, I haven't seen it this way I was looking at the phones display if you look the picture at the pc monitor the diferense is seen well.
But if you look the phones display it seams the T610 is better.
Any way like you guys said the one is a smart phone and the other is just a very good SE phone I like them both but it is clear that P800 is the better if you have the money...
Hay to all SE funs p910i is the best. (I am here to help if I can...)
Tecknology mast be top. |
Tahir Ally
Joined: May 29, 2003
Posts: 106
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Which is better in picture clarity the T610 or 7250 |
dave_uk
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
This is going to sound weird but there seems to be a great variation in pic quality form one T610 to the next. This may have something to do with the pre-week 23 batches with the hissing problem but it's definitely different e.g my T610 displays much better quality pics than 2 or 3 others I have seen where customers have complained about the quality. By the way, I am not just talking out of my arse - I work for CPW so have had the opportunity to see a fair few in operation. Personally, I find I have better clarity on the T610 pics than my P800, at least the images seem sharper on the phone.
As for T610 vs 7250 pics, I'm no Nokia-basher but the 7250 cam is a joke, marginally better quality on-screen than the T68i Communicam pics. The 7250 is an overpriced, plasticky piece of junk and, unless haveing an integrated FM Radio is of the utmost importance to you, you need to have your head read to buy one of these over a T610.
Just my opinion.....
|
__spc__
Joined: Apr 04, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: To: Cc: Bcc: Subject: Message:
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-26 17:21:39, sam12 wrote:
The P800 camera quality is not very impressive.
The only problem with my p800 is the camera quality. If the quality can be improved the phone will have it all.
|
|
Not so - FM radio for the sake of completeness?
Why the need for a better cam? COnsidering what the P800 is, I think it's fine as it is. If you want quality pictures, then best get a digicam.
For 'light entertainment' purposes (like, when your mate is lying p*ssed-up in a gutter, naked!), the P800 camera is all you need!
Steven. 
This message was NOT posted from my P800 that I no longer have |
|
|
Posted: 2003-06-26 21:53
