| Author |
Proof by SE that t68=t68i |
rurouni
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: 46
From: Singapore
PM |
Guys I did some digging around to verify the truth of the pdf and from what I found it should be legit  so thanks much apaman..!
Basically I just fingered the address provided for the pdf from www.samspade.org. Below is my result.. those of you who know how to read all the info will be better able to decipher all that.. but seems to me from my limited knowledge that its legit
whois -h magic 192.104.54.31
gullfoss2.fcc.gov resolves to 192.104.54.31
Trying whois -h whois.arin.net 192.104.54.31
Federal Communications Commission (NET-FCCNET)
1919 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20554
US
Netname: FCCNET
Netblock: 192.104.54.0 - 192.104.54.255
Coordinator:
Wolodkin, Vince (VW3-ARIN) vince@powernav.com
(410)872-9240 (202)496-3930 (FAX) (410)872-9233
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
NS.FCC.GOV 192.104.54.1
NS.UU.NET 137.39.1.3
Record last updated on 11-Aug-1995.
Database last updated on 9-Mar-2002 19:56:49 EDT.
The ARIN Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet
Network Information: Networks, ASN's, and related POC's.
Please use the whois server at rs.internic.net for DOMAIN related
Information and whois.nic.mil for NIPRNET Information.
traceroute gullfoss2.fcc.gov
gullfoss2.fcc.gov resolves to 192.104.54.31
3 198.172.117.161 2.795 ms DNS error [AS2914] Verio
4 129.250.29.126 3.145 ms ge-6-2-0.r00.lsanca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio
5 129.250.2.25 13.209 ms p4-2-0-0.r01.snjsca03.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio
6 129.250.2.62 12.852 ms p16-3-0-0.r04.snjsca03.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio
7 129.250.3.34 16.132 ms p4-0-1-0.r00.scrmca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio
8 129.250.9.98 17.41 ms p4-0.uunet.scrmca01.us.bb.verio.net [AS2914] Verio
9 152.63.53.6 16.290 ms 0.so-2-0-0.XL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [AS701] Alternet
10 152.63.54.10 20.776 ms 0.so-3-0-0.TL2.SAC1.ALTER.NET [AS701] Alternet
11 152.63.19.170 82.119 ms 0.so-3-0-0.TL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET [AS701] Alternet
12 146.188.177.226 84.27 ms 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.DCA8.ALTER.NET [AS702] UUNET - Commercial IP service provider in Europe
13 146.188.162.250 83.656 ms 288.at-1-0-0.XR2.TCO1.ALTER.NET (DNS error) [AS702] UUNET - Commercial IP service provider in Europe
14 146.188.161.125 85.12 ms 192.ATM6-0.GW3.TCO1.ALTER.NET [AS702] UUNET - Commercial IP service provider in Europe
15 157.130.34.150 89.939 ms fcc-gw2.customer.ALTER.NET [AS701] Alternet
16 192.104.54.31 85.554 ms gullfoss2.fcc.gov [AS701] Alternet
|
|
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
Well thats great news and surely clears up the smoke for a few people in here!!!
|
apaman
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 191
From: Italia - USA
PM, WWW
|
Here is the full site and this is original
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/oet/forms/reports/Search_Form.hts?fetchfrom=0&form=Generic_Search&mode=edit&show_records=50&grantee_code=PY7&product_code=1130202
|
Superluminova
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: ...Mummies Tummy!
PM |
well thats cleared it all up there the same apart from cosmetically 
_________________
http://airbag-design.50megs.com/ will be uploaded to the web soon!
"  will be the stuff of legend "
[ This Message was edited by: Superluminova on 2002-03-10 18:34 ] |
Epedemic
Joined: Dec 28, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark, Copenhagen
PM |
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=184215&native_or_pdf=pdf
interesting... that picture says that t68i was manufactured week 47 2001..... that just about a month after the original t68m was released  |
apaman
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 191
From: Italia - USA
PM, WWW
|
It shows that the fcc recived this pne on march 2001 in their office 
|
arroyootje
Joined: Feb 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK-Belgium-Azerbaijan
PM |
yeah, bastards...  |
oxin_Rain
Joined: Jan 01, 2002
Posts: 72
From: MARS
PM |
that means that they will have the same memory???? |
mrNoodles
Joined: Feb 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-03-10 20:58, oxin_Rain wrote:
that means that they will have the same memory????
|
|
Yepps they are exactly the same inside!!
|
ewap8
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: 398
From: Dubai
PM |
dats good news!
any idea when T68i will come in the market?
ps- i cant make out what all crap is written down here, but is unwanted as u ppl are sure that both are the same...
|
apaman
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 191
From: Italia - USA
PM, WWW
|
just wanted they late comers to read this news
|
lor
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM |
people here say the phone will be out next week, I do not trust em though
[addsig] |
GRIFTER
Joined: Feb 23, 2002
Posts: 89
From:
PM |
great research that you've done here apaman!
[ This Message was edited by: GRIFTER on 2002-03-12 09:10 ] |
jmcomms
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Jonathan Morris
PM, WWW
|
Why should anyone be surprised that the T68i was in development so long ago (probably before the T68m even started shipping)?
Sony Ericsson already existed then so it would have been a priority to get working on rebranding the product range. They couldn't exactly hold off the launch, or recase the phones already built but not yet shipping.
If you knew how long phones were in development, I would expect the replacement to the T68 (more colours, higher resolution screen, faster processor, JAVA etc.) to be well beyond the basic development stage already.
Even when Nokia "rushed" the 7210, they would have obviously had lots of prototype models to work from.
Samsung seem to have so much money that they're rumoured to be building THREE smart phones, one using Symbian, another using Stinger and the last one Linux! Think of the development costs when two will be scrapped and never make the light of day..
Jonathan
[ This Message was edited by: jmcomms on 2002-03-13 02:08 ] |
lor
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Planet Bob
PM |
Gotta admit, samsung has some very nice phones. Some a lot better than the nokias
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2002-03-10 17:01
