| Author |
Im going to buy a new phone but what phone shuld i buy? |
Svedge
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: 34
From: Norway
PM |
If I were you I would have bought a T65 or a T66. The cheap Nokias are just so terrible, and they are very simple phones.  has a much higher quality than Nokia.
Before I got T68 I had a 3310, but somebody stole it. The Nokia 33xx phones are just crap.
[ This Message was edited by: Svedge on 2002-03-07 10:52 ] |
|
|
ferrarista44
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: down south
PM |
buying a new phone?
hmm, not the 3310. because the 3310 has even a low resale value than the 3210 here in the Philippines.
ericssons have exceptional features.
siemens mobile phones have pretty good features too.
the new alcatels are seeming to catch up.
your choice.
broaden your horizon, dont just limit your options to both NOKIA and ERICSSON...
there are a lot of good phones out there, and one might just suit you perfectly. 
|
Eamonn
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
PM |
alcatel is quite good actually....
|
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
I would definitely not say the 33xx phones are crap. It is on the contrary the best phone made in this category for the targetted market. It's extremely simple to use (no phone is simpler than this), cheap, well-designed, with a reasonable size, and customizable at will.
Now, it all depends what usage of the phone you will have.
If you don't care about GPRS, CSD and just want to talk and send/receive SMS then go for a 3310.
If you want to wap a little bit only, then a WAP capable handset (w/o GPRS) is enough: e.g. 3330.
If you want to wap a lot, then a WAP-over-GPRS capable handset is what you need as the call cost will seamingly be lower.
Anyway, the choice is yours 
You may also want to wait for CeBit 
|
papajames
Joined: Mar 01, 2002
Posts: 37
From: philippines
PM |
take a peek at the panasonic gd75. i have one and i like it but is it available there? |
mhorton
Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Get the T65,
|
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
buy an ericsson no other crap.
(ok some alcatel and motorola's are good but that's it)
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
Master_anton
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Posts: 1
From: sweden
PM |
i think you should buy the ericsson t65
i have one and its the best phone i ever haved:grin: |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Since no one seems to answer your questions, I will :-)
The T65 has T9 and vibration. It also has very good battery performance and a large and nice screen with support for background images.
I think that Ericsson phones has great quality. I've had 4 Ericsson phones and have not had a single problem with anyone of them.
This post was posted from a T68 |
Super Psyduck
Joined: Feb 26, 2002
Posts: 31
From: Norway
PM |
OK then il probably get the t65 it seems good and it looks great.
Now to the other question:
What colour shuld i pick for my t65???
It's:
Dark blue a.k.a Cosmic
Light lue a.k.a Polar
Yellow a.k.a stardust
I don't know i think the pictures of the Polar is cool.
But does it look the same in real life? |
Eamonn
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
PM |
polar looks really shite...
|
rdlc
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: 90
From: uk
PM |
Why dont u buy a t68 from sum where like vodafone on contract 4 a fraction of the price that way u can have ur gprs set up on ur phone
This post was posted from a T68 |
mhorton
Joined: Jan 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Cosmic or Polor.
|
Lusipher
Joined: Dec 11, 2001
Posts: 333
From: Norway
PM |
Buy a T65 or if your not so demanding to the looks and ned more hitech stuff buy a t39 it has the same stuffing as the master - T68 but a worse os and look
Anyway if your bying a phone to that price it should be an ericsson. |
Super Psyduck
Joined: Feb 26, 2002
Posts: 31
From: Norway
PM |
I really like the polar.
I think i shuld buy that one it's cool.
Well now it's just some more weeks.
Anyone have anything bad to say about their ericsson phone??? |
|
|
Posted: 2002-03-07 10:51
