| Author |
C902 vs N95-1 |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
also check planks flickr
planks flickr
 Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i,  |
|
|
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
On 2009-09-22 20:17:06, mrjulius wrote:
also check planks flickr
planks flickr
Man, that does not mean anything. I also have good C902 fotos in my flickr and I know that it can take good fotos! The matter is that the N95 is a much better all-round camera than C902 and behaves much better in almost every situation (even the LED flash is better). Although, I do believe that C902 is only better in strong day-light macros. C902 has a nice camera but it should be much (much!) more versatile for its price and outstanding camera-phone pseudo status.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-22 20:12 ] |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
nope c902 beats n95 i have also n95
also beats in video
qvga vs vga
we know that vga is more quality it wins only the bigger size video hehehe
not in frames by frames
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-09-22 20:14 ] Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i, |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
So in zide's comparison the N95 wins but in mrjulius' comparison the C902 is the winner? Clearly both comparisons are invalid as the winner 'just' happens to be phone each person likes the most...
As far as I am concerned, both phones are fairly equal as camera phones when the photos are viewed at full size:
- One produces very noisy photos with purple fringing and excessive sharpening.
- The other produces photos with excessive noise reduction making them look like water color paintings.
- Both look very good when the photos are viewed at reduced size.
Of course plank is offline, otherwise this thread would have been filled with abuse and insults towards anyone saying anything bad about his [gollum]precious[/gollum] 
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-09-23 05:38 ] |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
Of course plank is offline, otherwise this thread would have been filled with abuse and insults towards anyone saying anything bad about his [gollum]precious[/gollum]
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-09-23 05:38 ]
Rofl!
Well, there is some people who can't admit that their stuff (cell-phones in this case) might be inferior of what they should (c902 camera is completely under expectations) and that leads their subconscience to get biased fotos and biased avaluations. They will only change the opinion and, pherhaps, admit it, when something better comes and replaces de old one.
As told, I like very much my C902 even tho its crappy display size however, I admit that its weakest point is its camera (as it should be the strongest!). And yes MrJulius ad Plankgatan, it can take great photos but they come 2 out of 10. With N95 (which isn't already an high-end Nokia camera phone) I got almost every photo with the right focus and with a right light management. It's all about efficiency.
Atention that I prefer SE to Nokia. |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
hahaha its only in your opinion. you have a bad cam module. |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2009-09-23 14:15:07, mrjulius wrote:
hahaha its only in your opinion. you have a bad cam module.
lol, this is pathetic, If you do not have anything smart to say, dont say nothing.
and please dont link resized photos.
OnePlus 8 |
mrjulius
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Pleasant Hills, Manila
PM, WWW
|
ok blah blah.. la. la. la. i w0nt say anything
Xperia Arc S, AinoU10i, x10m, c902, k750i, |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
http://www.smape.com/en/reviews/nokia/Nokia_6220_classic-rev.html
Scroll the link down until you reach the comparison between Nokia 6220c and C902.
I really doubt that his camera is also faulty...
Edit:
More photos to compare N95 and C902!
All in auto (flash off):
C902:
N95 (has that stange light because a car was passing by):
C902:
N95:
C902:
N95:
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-24 00:53 ] |
mode
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@zide
You might wanna compare more than just between a blurry picture and a sharp picture to prove your point. As it is, they're not good comparison shots. Shoot your objects on timer, then we'll see.
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC* |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
Both phones have crap cameras anyway, but its true N95 has been a better performer hands down when comparing it with C902. PF or NR, Sharpening or Oil Painting Effect those are lame excuses for a camera phone dubbed to be the best (also its a shame to award N95 the best 5mp by TIPA afterall when the reason is that its the only 5mp available on the market that time) i would instead go for C901 or any Samsung 5mp phones if image quality is considered, even 6700 is a worthy one 
~19 years at Esato |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
On 2009-09-24 03:00:24, mode wrote:
@zide
You might wanna compare more than just between a blurry picture and a sharp picture to prove your point. As it is, they're not good comparison shots. Shoot your objects on timer, then we'll see.
All those shoots were taken by my hands and, steady or not, the conditions were the same for both. That would be another problem if C902 can't handle a minor hand move (I was pretty still but I am not a statue a statue...).
Thats not the problem though, to make that clear I've also taken comparison shots with the timer... And the result is this:
C902:
N95:
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-24 18:10 ] |
mode
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Where's Plank when you need him?
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC* |
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
the only bad thing about n95 (and 6220, n82) is the overly aggressive jpeg compression.
amount of resolved details are lower compared to the competition..
imagine a 5mp pic of 600-700kb ave file size?
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress |
volume100
Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 211
From: Sarajevo
PM |
After seeing these images I have to say I expected more from a C902... And I may be overdoing it, but this makes me so pleased I got a C901 instead of any of the two as they were options also. 
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-22 20:17
Xperia Arc S, 
