| Author |
High definition mobile phone photos |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-09-24 08:27:14, whizkidd wrote:
The basic issue here is that for moving images, HD resolution is enough (in fact, very good!) because it is moving and even with the highest eye of detail, human eyes will not be able to spot discrepancies (if any). That however is not the case with still images which we can ogle at for hours.
Tell that to those people here at Esato who insist on posting piddly 0.7MP shrunken photos from their expensive 5MP camphones and saying that full size is not needed!  (For those people, camphone development should have ended with the 1MP S700i...)
|
|
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
LOL
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
@Abu Basim:
Well i would love to see an S700 having 720p video recording! its still my most favorite camphone from SE. it still has the best sensitivity of all the camphones available imo.
~19 years at Esato |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Anyway I think I was not thinking when I posted this thread. For some reason I kept thinking when I seen a HD still camera I thought of HD images. But realising its video. Silly me.
Phone?? What phone?? |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
Actually its not your fault, but the fault (deliberate) by the companies trying to mix things up and confuse their users.
~19 years at Esato |
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-24 11:01
